They do not know this is going to happen. I'm telling you this
is gonna be a weird Adam curry,
John C. Dvorak.
It's December 6 2009. Time for your Gitmo nation media
assassination episode 154. This is no agenda, acting as your
last line of defense against the lamestream media and coming to
you from the minimum security containment sell crackpot
command center and get mo nation West San Francisco, California
in the morning. I'm Adam curry
and from Northern Silicon Valley where they've predicted rain for
the last few days and of course, it hasn't rained I'm John C.
Dvorak.
Greg Levin buzzkill a
predicted rain at under the Friday it's gonna rain Saturday
wherever it's gonna rain it's gonna be raining all weekend
funny how it can rain to drop Funny
how that can be wrong about that yet so right and the science be
in about climate climate change
global warming let's get that straight global warming. So I
was watching Al Gore's on Letterman that he was a rerun it
earlier in the month I guess he was on the guy is apt you know
I've started to
hate the guy aren't you? Know I don't I've
never I find that guy distressing. But he is really I
mean, I'm beginning to think maybe David Icke is right
that he's reptilian
Gore is you see this? He looks like he's gonna it looks like a
turtle for one thing. And he looks like he's gonna bite let
him do that at some point is just mouths gonna open real
wise. He's gonna bite Letterman's head off
big tongue is gonna come out. Yeah, no, I know. It already
looks like he ate himself. Look, how cute would you become?
Well, he's actually lost a little weight apparently. But
whatever the case is, he's still got you know, he looks like you
know, he has a reptilian look and he drinks his head around.
Oddly like, and so I don't know, I'm gonna take up drinking more
because the whole thing is,
he might actually be the Geico Gecko. Because David
Icke is nuts.
You know, David Icke has has a lot of very valid points. I've
never really gotten into the whole reptilian thing but I too
must admit when I when I look at many people within our
government, you know it maybe it's just like, you know, a lot
of people like on television have the same look like big
heads and stuff. Maybe just politics is that just all have
that rep reptilian the reptilian stylings
look at Kissinger. Yeah. And the thing is, you know, these guys,
they live forever. I mean, we don't really know how old
Kissinger is. Now. He's
probably 130. He has been around for quite a while, hasn't he?
Yeah. Didn't Al Gore? Did I misread this? That Al Gore just
picked up a Nobel Peace Prize?
Did I miss something? Or did he actually pick up the statue? Or?
I maybe I don't know. There's, you know, there's been so
much What are you talking about?
No idea. Let me say I, because of you know what, right now, if
I look at my list of stuff, stuff, and I've been collecting
stuff all week, as usual, even though I was in Pennsylvania,
same time as the President, by the way. I didn't know that.
It's all climate gate stuff. That's the most of course,
there's a lot of Al Gore stuff in there. By the way.
Interesting thing happened at in Pennsylvania. As I flew,
actually, I flew into New York, as you know, we had that
horrible show on Thursday with a connection from the lovely
Crowne Plaza at New Newark. Sorry, Liberty airport, Liberty
International. I can't call it that. It's still Newark, Newark
Airport.
They changed the name from Newark. You didn't know that?
No, I had no clue
how they change. It's like 2002. I think it's Liberty
International. However, anyone who seems to fly into Liberty
gets incarcerated. That's where they always pick people up.
Remember the guy who exposed the Goldman Sachs? Right? Flash
trading code? If you come in to liberty, that's where your
liberty is taken away, which is kind of a joke, I guess. So the
President was touring, I guess he went to Allentown and I
didn't know this. So I don't know if the security was beefed
up. Or if it's always like that at Philadelphia International
two things of note. So as I'm rolling up to the TSA security,
you know, you have like the airport security, which is not
TSA, it's just airport security. And apparently their job is to
precondition you as to what you can and cannot do. And they have
this whole script now. You know, it's like, no water, no coffee,
no milkshake that and their only real task in life, it seems is
to check and see if you have a boarding pass in your hand
because, oh, please don't enter the line without a boarding
pass. Right? Yeah. Now at Philadelphia International. They
have an expert traveler line, the founders to be highly
interesting. It's a Black Diamond line, which of course
for us.
This is not just new. This is David just bounces around. They
had one in San Francisco for a while then they took it out.
Then they had one in Oakland for a while and they took it out.
Well, it's a total farce because I of course, I mean, I look at
the sign I'm like, Yeah, that's me. You know, it's it says a
number of things like you, you travel frequently, you know, you
Yeah, lightly. And you also it says, You are a premium flight
member like, Oh, I got all kinds of premium cards. And then I'm
behind a guy who was like, oh my god, I gotta get rid of my
bottle of water and actually say to him say, oh, excuse me sir.
You are clearly in the wrong line. This is for expert
travelers. There's only so good fog Rafah but but the the
airport security troll the the person who checks your your if
you if you're in possession of a boarding pass, right?
By the way, there's a variety of did nothing talk about
inconsistency. They have this you know, a little UV light they
flash on No, no, no, that's
that's the that's the TSA. I'm talking about the the actual
security that is the private security firm that works at the
airport that you stand in before you get to TSA security. And so
now and this person was saying some very interesting things.
First of all, please get rid of all of your liquids before you
enter the checkpoint. This is new John. They are now calling
it a checkpoint. It used to be mine, Charlie, I had again.
Yeah, it used to be and I looked at the TSA website and they are
now I don't know if it's changed. But now I see. They're
also calling it a checkpoint. And it used to be just, you
know, airport security, TSA security. No, it's the
checkpoint. But then the kicker. The kicker is this person, this
this waste of human space is a waste of carbon emissions, is
telling me before you get into the checkpoint line, make sure
you get rid of all your coffee and you must also take your
candles out. I'm like my Kindle. I gotta take my candle out of my
bag. You can cheat your candle I like is Barbie Okay? Bonehead
kids a Kindle, you douche a Kindle.
She was probably at the meeting in the morning and they said we
were gonna start checking for Kindles now. And she heard Ken
doll. She was actually saying that and all
everybody, we got to Kindle. Love it. So it was a total. Your
must and you will obey experience. And I hate it when
they touch my shit too. You know, I put my shoes on top of
my jacket and my belt and all other pieces of clothing in one
little bin. And I hate it when they just grabbed my shoes and
put them on the belt. What sense does that make? Why do my shoes
have to go through separately on the belt? I don't like it don't
touch my shirts. Only
you know, I've seen that that happens here and there. There's
another one of these inconsistencies. You know, they
put the shoes on the belt and so I've been fed. I've been chewed
one through seven. Sometimes it's like, you put the shoes on
the belt. They put it in the bin. You put the shoes in the
bishop put your shoes on the belt.
You're full slave shut up and do as I tell you Yeah, yeah,
inconsistency. Yeah, that's I agree. That's probably the
worst. The worst part
that you enjoyed the experience? Oh,
yes. No, I enjoyed it very much. I have to say I flew US Airways
haven't flown them in quite a while. Nice. Nice new planes 00
frills. They've got no onboard audio no video.
Yeah. Flying in army plane.
What was it was a brand new Airbus A 321, which was nice.
And I upgraded for here's a trick for all you, passengers.
When you travel on I've done this on United. And now also in
US Airways, what you want to do is check into the premium or
first class Self Service Desk. You know, don't be intimidated
by signs that say first class only, you know, just walk right
up checking on that because that's where you actually get, I
believe better offers. I upgraded for $15. For dollars.
Yeah, that's a major steal. And you get in there's no line, you
don't have to wait like a sheep. You know, and then you know,
it's not like you're gonna get arrested. And then the person
will just because they're just zombie bots to just waiting for
some, you know, piece of paper to spit out to grab your bag
because I always travel with the one check piece of luggage. They
don't say anything like Oh, I'm sorry. You can't be in this
line. You're not a first class passenger. Just ignore all that.
And if you're traveling United from San Francisco in
particular, do not I repeat do not pay for the premium security
line because that line is twice as long as the regular one.
They're charging you to wait long. This is stupid. I love it.
Yes, yes. Fabulous. So I'm doubly happy happy today
oh well because you're back in the Bay Area
back Well back in the in the compound in the crockpot command
center first of all you know Mickey has been away for two
weeks and I'm flying to Los Angeles tonight and when I get
to see her again so I'm very happy about that. But also I
still had a nice day yesterday we spent a lot of time reading
through stuff preparing for you know preparing for the show. I
love
the Amanda Knox story what Uh huh she anyone listening to this
stream can see it that what yeah,
what Amanda Knox
yeah talk this funny that you wouldn't know that this is the
this is the drawback Are you not living in London? Okay,
this is maybe I do know about it but I just don't record this is
the dump did candidate dangling from Seattle this chick arrested
two years ago in Italy from for being part of a Satanic
and she has she killed the she and her boyfriend killed and
killed
the girl and there was a really good and outstanding CPS second
and now
totally falls in the real news category.
Yeah, but it doesn't but it will stream it will morph Okay, talk
has some points to make.
First of all, they're all kind of hot look, the guy's a real
nerd. He looks evil but those two girls were pretty hot
looking.
Well one of them is dead. So anyway, so hot looking now but
CBS has did us 48 hours on it and this girl is obviously being
railroaded. Now that said everybody knows that the family
which is upset about this whole thing because this girl is kind
of a you know, it's pot smoking dangling from Seattle. And, and
she was, you know, classically naive, and got caught up in a
situation where you have a prosecutor who's actually under
indictment for all sorts of misconduct, according to CBS,
and but they don't care and he's the one who made up these
stories about the satanic stuff and fed it to the British press
and they ran all this stuff and so the whole thing is a scam of
some sort. But it's not you know, it's kind of a nothing to
see here kind of thing when we were watching it. Because, you
know, we get we can still recall the fact that Kern County has a
similar prosecutor who's still in the job as far as I know it's
and there was a documentary done about Kern County and again the
fact is prosecutor made up a bunch of stuff about cults and
satanic pedophile cults in this nation. They were railroading
citizens in the area. And and apparently still,
well, you know, my theory on that is that justice and other
government officials who are the actual cult, sex fiends and
pedophiles, that's why they do it. They detract want to
distract attention away from themselves and railroad other
people?
Well, the point is, is that we have enough kangaroo courts in
the United States to keep people busy forever. And you know, and
of course, if you you know, follow any of the the
imprisonment issues, I mean, we have more people per capita in
the United States in prison, and we actually have a bigger total
of people in prison than China has. We have
over 3 million people incarcerated cost $40,000 a year
per inmate. It's a huge business and these jails are privatized
and the jails are privatized so it's in their best interest and
so you have to imagine if you're in the business of having
privatized jails you're you're say you're one of the companies
you will have lobbyists to promote you know, harsher prison
sentences you promote three strikes you promote all these
things to load up the prisons because the prisons are
essentially cheap labor for all sorts of things. And this
and this I think, relates to you know, those four no five cops
who were shot in Washington for four four cops were shot in
Washington, I believe. And of course I don't think they've
actually found this guy and that was a whole ban him and shot him
off shit all right, well, then they found him and shot him. But
what's what's going on here is people are getting very angry at
law enforcement. They're tasing everybody left and right you
know, there's they're not on the right path. Just I was at
Starbucks here on Second Street yesterday. And I see a van
driving but not not even a van like you know, one of those all
purpose. You know, like a soccer mom van one of those things.
Yeah, man, I guess. And it's driving up and there's and
there's two black people in there. And they look middle age,
and a cop pulls them over on secondary for no reason. Except
just your black people in a nice lookin van. We got to stop you
and then this guy gets out. And you could see the whole scenario
and everyone Starbucks was saying the same thing. Look at
that. This is just these people just being harassed by this cop.
And so people are angry at the at law enforcement. And of
course, not all members of law enforcement are evil and bad.
And I know and I have known many, many who are completely on
the up and up. But, man this, if you think the sheeple have No
nation are being indoctrinated. What do you think about law
enforcement? It's horrible. So that undoubtedly, people are
getting 70 years for you know, for, for smoking marijuana,
three strikes, go to go to jail for life, people are getting
pissed off.
Well, it's getting ridiculous because the prot, you create
this weird situation where you have so many people that get
incarcerated, they can't get work when they come out. And so
they have to go back to jail. It's almost like the jails is
their new job. They're kind of stuck with it. Because let's
face it, especially in this economy, you're going to be
hiring people. And you got three candidates. One's just a recent
college grad that can't get work in another guy's very
experienced was a criminal, he just got out of jail, you're not
gonna hire him, he's never gonna get a job. Let's face reality.
There's no way of putting him back into the normal structure
of society. So he goes back to jail because that's a steal
something. And the next thing you know, he's back making
license plates or horse dollars or whatever they do in some of
these places. There's a lot of this is documented on the
internet become a lifestyle. Yeah, that's that's a lifestyle.
And it's also slave labor that we're always accused and we're
great at involving China. They use slave labor when they're
prisoners. We're the ones who do that. We use slave labor,
essentially, to make products but with privatized prisons and
the privatized prison system.
It's ridiculous. It's a remake. I mean, license plates, of
course, no, no, there's a bunch of
stuff. And there's I can get you the document. We'll post it on
the show notes. There's all kinds of products made by all
sorts of companies using prison labor.
So it's not like like state run stuff, but actual companies are
using prison labor. Yeah. Oh, okay.
It's switching on Scandal.
Oh, that we should definitely look into that. John. I'd love
to know which companies are doing that. We'll do that. And
we need to call them out. But anyway, thanks.
So let's get back. So back to the Amanda Knox scam back to the
hot chick. She's moderately hot. And she has she has I've been
alone for two weeks. Okay, nevermind. So anyway, I have a
clip. And this is the kind of the point that I would like to
discount almost bordering on a pet peeve. But it's a
would you like the jingle? I'm happy to play it. Yeah.
All right. It's probably less of a pet peeve. But it is a warning
that people would play the Amanda Knox clip. This is from
this from the CBS show that ran last night. By the way, you can
go see this online. I would recommend watching this because
it's very eye opening
folks by their websites. On her MySpace page, Amanda Knox called
herself foxy Knoxy and bragged about having multiple sex
partners. This picture taken at a military museum became
ammunition against her. On Rafi Ellie's page,
he expressed a fascination with serial killers.
I know that the police have been looking at these websites and
taking apart everything that needs to have said to a certain
degree. They haven't done themselves any favors by putting
this stuff on the web for all to see.
Okay, I'm gonna go delete my Facebook, my MySpace and my
Twitter accounts immediately.
That's what I would recommend. And let me just make a couple of
points here, which before we get into some of these other topics.
I don't understand, you know, the we've talked about this
before about the people who put their, you know, kind of
personal insight information on the internet for all to see. And
what whether it's for all to see or even when it's it's separated
out. If you've ever been in the you know, I worked for
government agency and I've done expert witnessing I've been in
front of a lot of lawyers, you don't say, and you want you won,
you you if you've ever been deposed, especially by some of
the big show.
It's frightening when when you're when you go through the
deposition, you actually think you're guilty that these guys
are so good. You sit there go like Oh crap. Well, if you look
at it that way, well, yeah, I understand what you're saying.
But so let's go through. So I have to stop you for one moment.
Would you have not mentioned the executive producer of today's
program? And I find that to be a huge oversight.
In fact, we do have a good executive producer again this
week we have we actually have unfortunate and I'm doing it
different this week.
Thank you net Pierre, for reminding me by the way. It's
not like I'm like Todd
Simmons.
Hey, wait a minute. Haven't we tired? Well, yes. Just keep
engaged. Keep
to give us more and more money or make planes. Eight Mile
plains, Queensland $220.22 Okay,
he's on a roll.
Well, he is actually the Associate Executive Producer
because he was topped.
Oh, no, wait a minute, so won't
buy another Australian
Of course. It doesn't surprise me. In the
this week's executive producer top billing is Richard from
Tasmania?
Does he have a last name? Or is it just rich? No, no last name.
Not gonna give it is Ta ta es mania or TA Yeah, yes.
Mania from Tasmania, Australia. He is a gave us 260. Nice. And
he has a message which we'll talk about during the call out
of all the donors.
Thank you very much. Richard from Tasmania and Todd Simmons.
You're filling
produce? Yes. You got billing on the website. And of course, you
can put it on your, on your CV on your resume. We will vouch
for you and it is a real deal. It will be recognized in in
media circles. Congratulations.
All right. So let's get back to this issue about these these
people who put too much personal information on the web that can
be misinterpreted. So let's say I had I say I've been railroaded
and I'm stupid enough to have this huge Flickr account. Right?
So I have pictures of everything I do because I really like
posting all these things. And I like my friends to see this.
Now. Let's say I have a picture of myself cooking up a big steak
on a barbecue that just fires way too hot. Right and I've been
railroaded into being a arsonist
right then of course, yeah, the media will grab that is the
other
Claridge's that guy's a Firebug and even when you get when you
look at D'souza picture and the picture of God, that picture
that was with his Amanda Knox, she was in some war museum and
she was holding, she was behind this huge machine gun with a
door the big mouth wide open. Just a goofball shot is what it
was. But they picked us up and made it look like she's an
idiot, you know, like a psycho. So anyway, you can see you no
matter what you do, you can't get around the fact that, you
know, the lawyer was are you proud of your photos? Mr.
Dwarka? You really enjoy posting them. So yeah, I mean, I post
them for whatever reason. So you are proud, you are proud. And
then what do you think of this? What is this photo with all this
burning? Is this is something you really like to show off?
You'd like to show off all this burning? will know just a
picture somebody took I posted on the Flickr account. Also you
weren't proud of it so you're embarrassed or humiliated you
really think you so is this some say hidden, deep secret? You
have you having problems with like, desires to burn things?
And, you know, you can just twist anything. And then the
worst part about Flickr, by the way, if you want to put all your
personal stuff up there if I had the same exact situation, but I
kept my pictures private. That would make it even worse. Yeah,
because
it was in behind. Yes, yeah. Exact Well, it's trying to hide
the
picture. So they
made it private. I saw this happen myself, John, where I
took a picture. While I was flying. I was piloting the Delta
Sierra. And I had one of my rolled up tobacco cigarettes in
my mouth. You know, it's that's what I love. My own plane is,
you know, I'll have to eat it soon enough. But I love I love
the plane. It has ashtrays for a reason. It's my freakin plane.
So I smoke in it. I love smoking. When I'm flying it, it
makes me feel like I'm Yes, it makes me feel like I'm above
everybody else who is flying commercially can't smoke. And
that picture was taken. And public. Of course, I sued the
magazines because that is the good thing about Flickr is they
have built in Creative Commons copyright. But that was taken
and turned around into Oh, Adam Curry's smoking dope in his
airplane. And it's like, Huh. It's the same thing. Only not in
a court of law. Thank God.
Yeah, well, the point. Yeah, the point is, is that this stuff can
be twisted. And people like to put goofy things up on the
internet, smushy people in their 20s, or teenagers. And these
things can all be used as evidence. And I'll tell
you the worst, the worst. And this just comes right back to
what we're talking about here is pictures of your kids be very,
very careful what pictures you publish of your kids. Because
that can be taken out of context so quickly, and there's so many
people ready to pounce and say, Oh, you're a sex offender. Oh,
you're a pedophile? Oh, you're doing weird things with your
kids. We got to take your kids away from you. Never put
pictures of your kids up online ever. Don't put anything up?
Well, unfortunately, this is my life. But you'll come and bail
me out. Right, John? You'll vouch for me. Yeah. Well, it
depends on how much money is in the Pay Pal account. Is my
budget
but it might be more interesting with Dino. But anyway, the point
is, is that this girl is being railroaded. But the naivete of
the public regarding the legal system and how they'll use
whatever they can whatever leverage they have. And if it's
some picture and by the way, the other thing about Flickr I use
it all the time as a as a intelligence gathering mechanism
for due diligence. Say I'm going to meet somebody have a meeting
or there's something I want to find out about. If they're in a
certain age group. I know they're going to have a Flickr
account. I can look it up and they have a search engine.
That's fine. tastic and I can see who they're hanging out with
because they have pictures of them in the bar the party or the
every other week or they had some party, you know,
party or haha you like partying, huh?
Seriously You know
what some other thing is very dangerous you know I took I
published one picture of you in your kitchen and luckily some
smart people told me Hey man, you might want to watch this
because you know, I took this with my new iPhone and and they
said hey, you know in the E x if data the GPS coordinates are
being published? No. So I turned off all the GPS coordinates.
They're no longer published but you can't actually strip it out
once it's uploaded. That's it. You can't you can't take it off
Flickr. You can't say, you know, you've got all these privacy
settings yet. There's no privacy setting for GPS data. Alright,
and well, that sucks. Anyway, if if some fans show up,
showing up all the time. Show up. They're here now.
Alright, so that ladies and gentlemen is the John Cena
borax. Diva.
So anyway, so they're railroading this poor woman and
it's it's but it could happen here. I mean, it does happen
here we have, we're worse than they are. Yes. So get off, you
know, get off to these websites. There's no reason no, it's you
know, it's another one of these excuses. Oh, I'd like to put all
my stuff on the air. Why don't you store your photos on Flickr?
Well, you know, how are you? Ladies and gentlemen cheap.
Yeah. Hey, there's just want to mention, no agenda. The Canadian
version will be up on iTunes tomorrow. Couple of there was
like 15 year old kids up there in Canada who were asked for our
jingles and and they're putting together a show.
I can't wait kids version of the no agenda show should be fun.
Love it.
Parents this may not be safe for consumption. It's a kid's
version. I can't wait. I bet it's gonna be awesome. I wonder
who's gonna play the crackpot and who's gonna play I wonder if
they're gonna do like, like the balance. So one of those me one
of them's you. It's pretty frightening. So the one thing
that we haven't really mentioned or pointed out and it kind of
became kind of abundantly clear to me, over the past two days
I've been reading around and prepping for the early service
today is that most countries in Europe do not yet realize the
wrath that is upon them as of December 1 2009, where the
Lisbon Treaty has now gone into effect. And what started out as
kind of a cool way to have the same money has now turned into
the United States of Europe, with a president not elected by
the people with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and we heard
what's his face? Talk about that on the previous show? We guy
like so much. Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, whatever his name is
from anyway, Baroness Ashton, who, in effect, you know, she's
she's calling a lot of the shots the citizens of the United
States of of Europe do not yet realize what is going to happen
to them as now, what I've been predicting what many people have
been predicting all of these European laws, I'm gonna start
raining down on them. And this became apparent, apparently
clear, when I was reading some, some comments on some telegraph
article in, in the UK. And, and the fine citizens of the United
Kingdom are saying, oh, you know, you know, it's not a big
deal. It's like, you know, if we don't like it, we'll just we'll
just pop out of the EU and we'll just, we'll see. That's a good
one. You do not understand what is actually they
said in South Carolina before the Civil War. Exactly.
You do not Yeah, civil war. That's, that's the main thing
you do not understand what has actually taken place. And, you
know, as I read the Lisbon Treaty, one of the all these
links are in the show notes, of course, no agenda show.com I
said that, you know, there's a real problem with the human
rights issues because you have to read all of the side notes
and all of these these different protocols that are not actually
in the main document, but are referenced in the main document.
And my main one was the death penalty where you know,
according to the Lisbon Treaty, the death penalty is outlawed in
the United States of Europe unless see protocol XYZ you read
that protocol. It says if you are running away from the
police, and they shoot and kill you, it will be a valid kill a
clean kill. So in the Netherlands, which is now a
proud state of the United States of Europe, it was a guy who
looked like he was a bad guy because he was he was a burglar
and he broke in somewhere in the in the mid southern part of the
of the Netherlands in, in Brabant, And so the cops show
up, he runs away and they shoot him. guys running. I mean
eSports like run after him, you know, get all units involved now
they just take aim and shoot him now they got him in the leg. But
this is this is new. This is very new new. This is new and
the new way of apprehending people. Hey, you're gonna run
away with me, I'm just gonna shoot you. Boom. Yeah, you got a
problem with that it go away. Stop you burglar. So and this
is, you know, I'll give you I can give you so many examples of
what is going to come down the wrath is upon you. And do not
think that you can secede from this union, you have no power,
you've given it up, you've given up to a bunch of unelected
people's reptiles, I should say, in Brussels, they are now going
to run your life. And we have some experience with that here
in the United States of America. We know how that works. It's not
fun, but at least we we pretended we elected our
president.
Yeah, but we you know, we've at least got it so it's workable.
They never gonna Yeah, it's workable. It's workable. They
get they'll never get to work.
Yes, there's so much. We've been amazed at the amount of
listeners we have from Australia. And I've so I've been
conversing with a lot of our listeners slash producers. And
they say Well, first of all, you know, we down here in Australia,
we we don't like being told what to do. And boy that that's
apparent, but man they are, they are really getting it. This is
the RSPCA which is the the Animal Protection Agency in in
Australia is now enacting into law, that if you do not walk
your dog every day, you can go to jail for five years.
But if the dog wasn't, doesn't want to go for
a walk, it doesn't matter. And if you can have a backyard, you
can have your dog running around the backyard, whatever you want,
that's all fine. But you have to walk your dog every single day.
If you don't walk your dog every single day you can be fined and
thrown in jail. And this is going into law. And this is this
is this is the precedent of
this because they hate they hate dogs. They make people with that
what would maybe get a dog but they can't walk. And what about
an invalid person who can't even get out of the house and the dog
is there and
they shouldn't have a dog than you should not? They'd rather
have the invalid person suffer?
Yeah, exactly. Then you should not have a dog walk the dog or
FaceTime behind bars. 12,000 Australian dollars,
why don't we get so much money from Australia?
I'm telling you and there's so much going on. They also have,
you know, I was amazed that there's three fifty.org, which,
you know, three for the 350 I'm not entirely agreeing with what
they stand for. Because they believe that we should only have
350 parts per million co2. And
they all they're all scientists. Yeah, exactly. But
at least they're against the stupid legislation. And they're
trying to get the world to sing in perfect harmony,
and other totally against cap and trade, which is a good
thing. That's where the riots are going to take place. And
that's why the
Australia has an organization called Get up, which had never
heard of either 350,000 people or registered members of this of
this group need you never hear about them ever, ever. So yeah,
I don't believe in the whole scientist vibe. But I do like
the fact that people are organizing and, and starting to,
well, it's the awakening. I think this is this is what
awake. This is what the prophecy has been.
Nobody is waking up. No, you're getting worse. No,
no wakening. It's funny you say that because people are saying
to me, Hey, I got a tweet. Hey, you know, you talk about
quitting your day job. Don't people need to get pissed off?
I'm like, Are you kidding me? There's only one guy at naevia
who listens to the show. One guy. It's, you know, Andrew
Roman.
Yeah. Andrew Zilla. Want to listen to the show. Yeah. And he
only mentioned his name, by the way.
I think he actually does care. He seems to be who's Katherine
Goldstein.
I want to show you that and just it's coming up. Okay.
And I was like, please, you know, they're too worried about
their own lives. Even if I quit my day job. They'd be like, you
know, after three months. Hey, where's Adam? Have you seen them
anywhere? They don't care.
Nobody knows. I keep telling
people listen to this show. You will be amazed at what you can
learn. They don't care. They don't listen. No time. Yeah,
they're just not interested. And they are.
We're not playing grunge music. I don't know what it is. Yeah,
so yeah, but they're no. Yeah, it is getting worse. But on the
other hand, the people who are awake will survive. And they
will provide us there's not going to be PayPal in the
future. There'll be no internet. We're gonna have to mesh our Wi
Fi networks together to have some kind of communication.
There'll be no cell phones, it will take all of that down. And
instead of Pay Pal money to do the show, people will bring us
food and water. And and,
or tungsten, whatever the
case doesn't matter. As long as it weighs the same, that's fine.
So I'm reading these articles. And this is the and so I ran
into these two women, which is kind of interesting. There's
there's this Katherine Goldstein, who is who I sent you
her Twitter, page picture. And it's just like, the most smug
looking person I've ever seen photographed.
Oh, I'm looking at her Twitter stream now. Yes, I understand.
Okay.
And she has a she's a she's a hope and Hagan person, your your
hardware, and with and just to give you an idea, this is the
kind of thing that is going nobody's paying any attention to
the green gate of the climate gate. And they're just marching
ahead and like, let me just read a couple of tweets from her.
She's the green editor for The Huffington Post. And they're
basically mocking climate gate. Uh huh. It's bullshit. And so
she but didn't you read their stuff here? You know, it's like,
do we have to open the gate John? I think we should.
To the gate to the gate to the clothes
the science of climate change denier? The Yeah, we got people
out there. Yeah, we got our peeps. She's going on and on
about one thing on our Twitter. Got another good reason why they
do a due diligence and read people's tweets. I can't believe
I'm going on a plane to Copenhagen.
I'm going to Copenhagen yay. It's debatably
the best job perk ever.
Oh, no. Yeah. Yeah, it's
your boy.
I'm extremely worried about this. I went back and I say
there's a couple things we can talk about the incessant
marketing of Copenhagen, such as hope and Hagen,
right done by Milton Ogilvy. Yeah, which we pointed out
before it is a public relations company. Let me read another
tweet. And maybe I should just read these tweets randomly. Just
met with an amazing Danish chef slash food person to talk. Why
I'm feeling so incredibly excited about my trip, and lucky
to be going.
Meanwhile, one of our Danish producers sent in a Google
translation link from a Danish publication. Apparently, if you
show up at any of the ads prostitution is legal in, in
Denmark. If you show up with your credentials, that you are a
member of the Climate Change Conference, you can have free
sex, free sex under the slogan be sustainable. Do not buy sex.
So it's only if it's if you're in the Danish government, you do
not qualify. But you know, if you if you show your creds, then
you can get free sex. That's why I'd like to go. Okay. This is
the best job in the world. I love I love me the free sex.
It's awesome. Yeah, it's this it's out of control.
Well, you know what I was thinking. Anyway, I was looking
at the picture of this woman and you can all look at it. It's
twitter.com. It's in the shownotes. Yeah. Well, there's
another woman that looks like an older version of this one. You
have a link for her to and I'm gonna give her a picture.
Actually. She's the Newsweek green person. And she's
absolutely huge. It's almost like a clone of each other step
one's older.
Milk Greenie.
It's a green. Yeah, yeah. Well,
it's a gift the greeny I'd like to fornicator
well, maybe it would
you know me. Although I've switched recently have gone to
younger birds now. This would be the older version. No, no. Don't
make me do her.
So I'm just saying this is what they do. But they look the same.
It's a one's older.
She's does not Well, yeah. But she has the same like, Look at
me. I am above at all. Please, please, please. What do you
think you are?
So anyway, that's a She's probably
one of these women who has only worked in government.
No, or only been a journalist and she looks more like, like,
once monitors. There's a bunch of older journalists that get
this sad sack quality. That is, it's just, it's just depressing
to be around them. And then they're all the climate change,
you know, mavens and a good example. She, I mean, one of the
pictures, this is again, the internet, you know, given me too
much information. And one of the pictures of this woman is with
this with this, the Dalai Lama, and which I'll give you a shot
of that, and you see, you can just look at the images page.
And you see that is this a something? I don't know what it
is, it's just kind of you just don't feel like she's very well
connected with reality.
Well, okay. So, you know, there's a couple of we've
basically opened up the gate. So I think what yeah, she's not
very well connected at all, we have to talk about a couple of
things. So first of all, climate gate, as it's being called, is
very significant. Every day, and there's more links in the show
notes at no agenda show.com. And if they're not working for you,
you can check them out@curry.com or divorce act.org. There are
more links in there than ever about that not only the data
being false about the the programming that they've used to
actually calculate this global warming being shitty shoddy
programming. The UK net office has now even announced they plan
to reexamine 160 years of temperature data, after
admitting that public confidence in the science of manmade global
warming has been shattered. So you know, even even
and, and and according to one website that follows this, this
has been going on for at least 14 days with no mention in the
exam, three major networks, right. And of course, hooked to
the fact that one of the little aspects, one of the positive
aspects of global warming will be that we you know, there's
going to be all these laws in place, if you look at them at
the bill passed by the House in the United States, that bill
that hasn't gone any further cap and trade that has cap and
trade. They say that when you sell your house, you're going to
have you have to have a green on it. You have
to get left to sell all of your all of your appliances
all. General Electric is the beneficiary of that they own NBC
say
they own NBC. Jeffrey Immelt is at the white house all the time.
He's hanging MSNBC, CNBC, all of them. Meanwhile, Gordon Brown,
another reptile. Boy, he's got a reason he's got real reptilian
features. He is said, of course, that this is all this is all a
bunch of hooey. And I'm looking for the exact quote, I know
you've seen it. He essentially said that climate change deniers
are like Flat Earthers. And I'm laughing because he's using the
analogy incorrectly. Because the Flat Earthers were the people
who were who were so convinced the science is in and there's
there's no denying everyone agrees you'll fall off the edge
of the earth and then some brave people, amongst others,
debatable, but Christopher Columbus said No, man, I think
that this thing is round, and I'm gonna wind up somewhere he
thought I was gonna wind up in a in India, whatever, or Japan or
whatever. But he wound up in, in the new land in America. So in
fact, Gordon Brown, you are a flat earther it is exactly the
other way around.
Yeah, I know. They've done a good job of twisting what they
have Ogilvy. This is one of the number one companies that can
twist things around. They twist, they turn they spin. And you
know, hope and Hagen is a perfect example. It's genius.
Yeah. No, yeah, no. And in fact, if you there's an article in the
show notes about this hope and Hagen project, and it really it
traces all the roots back to how all these big companies by the
way, Coca Cola will be serving all of the drinks. Chrysler, I
believe will be driving everyone around in in Copenhagen. It's a
huge commercial venture. It's like a big ass trade show. You
know, it's like when you're an ad tech in New York, you've got
Yahoo cars that drive you around, they can pick you up at
Times Square and drive to wherever you want to go with a
big yellow Yahoo on the side. So Coca Cola is going to be
providing all of the drinks to any conflict of interest there.
Do you think Chrysler will be providing all of the vehicles
and of course it'd be hybrids and whatever other bulls show up
with and that's what that's what this whole hope and Hagen thing
is about. It's bringing in all of these very powerful
corporations who let's face it, actually run the whole We'll
show it's bringing it all together. But I am so worried I
went back and I looked at Lord monckton's speech again, where
he, of course, and I also, I really did my best reading
through this Copenhagen Treaty, which scares me just the name by
itself, because it sounds too much like Lisbon Treaty. And he
says, you know, it's the first time I've really read in any of
these documents that talking about governmental. I repeat
governmental control over finance and climate.
It's all about one world government. Yeah. And the whole
idea of all this stuff, whenever you boil it down, and you take
these people like these two women, we were gonna have, you
know, the young and old version of the same green woman, it's
all about turning the United States sovereignty over to some
buddy else, they really want to do that. And people have to wake
up to this and it's the same thing with Australia. They would
they want to put up a one world government that just, you know,
the, the model, of course, is Europe, they're gonna see how
that works out because they'll never get very far. Well, we'll
be about a decade, but they want to do that.
So I'm court I made a mistake. It's not Chrysler, it's BMW, so
Coca Cola, SAP, Siemens, and BMW are tapping the creative talents
of many of the world's top agencies. This is the title of
the article is from coping to hoping and so here's the quote,
getting people to understand not only why this is so keenly
important, but what they can do to come on board and act. This
is exactly what marketing communications advertising PR
do. exceedingly well get people to be aware and take action says
Paul Cohen, Vice President of Ketchum, who are also a member
of the hope and Hagen group,
catch him. That's a huge PR agency.
Now that's what they do. It is what they do.
So they were talking about slick operators shoving this agenda
down our throats, you know, those guys should be
responsible. People should take note of these companies if
they're going to be promoting one world government otherwise a
government to overs in other words, they are actually anti
American. That is the most anti American thing to be involved
in. I would I would call out catch him on this coke. Well,
they basically want to, they want to they want to screw us
this is a screw job.
Coke will have a big presence at the conference in exploiting
pouring rights it has secured from the city of Copenhagen. So
not just at the conference, but pouring rights for the whole
city of Copenhagen, which is a big deal as if you know anything
about the Coke and Pepsi wars. A number of high ranking coke
executives will be in attendance including Chief Executive
Officer, Muhtar Kent, who will co host a un event at Cronenberg
castle. BMW will be faring delegates around Chi in old
carbon footprint here in electric vehicles SAP which is
another huge company, we'll be using the conference in part to
push its clients to recognize the push its clients. In other
words to sell to recognize the importance of embracing
sustainable practices. Since a sales job. That's a huge s sales
day.
Do you have that clip? I think we I don't know if we played it
last week, that clip of the radical talking about what's
going to happen. What do you remember the name of the clip I
can look at? Well, it's pretty obvious when you see the list of
ones I just think as I send another copy
left this on climate. Yeah. Hold on a second. Let me just load
that up. I can put that in my new system. Oh, oh,
I hope that the anarchists that took over Seattle and screwed it
up, do the do the right thing.
So we rolled this out, yeah, roll it
off putting from climate disruption that are actually
obstructing and pushing our government from being the
primary obstacle to any kind of real climate solutions. And
they're poised to use carbon trading as a way that they can
both make huge amounts of money. And another thing subprime
housing speculative markets. And the worst part is not only will
a bunch of people get rich and the rest of us get poor, but it
won't actually stop climate change. So we're, we're calling
that out today. And we're saying we need to do what we did 10
years ago, and break with our government so that people inside
the United States are in solidarity with movements around
the world who are also fighting. And we need to know that this is
the next wave of the Global Justice Movement. We never the
battle never stopped in Seattle, and it's escalating this week,
tweak and we need people to if you were in Seattle, if you
would have been there to now step up around the next threat.
And I would say also, if you're whether you work on anti war,
workers rights, economic justice, that we need to wrap
our heads around the climate crisis and the false solutions,
or we're going to be blindsided that it is the central frame
through which we need to push back corporate power and assert
our rights to run our own life.
So I'm I'm a pacifist by nature, and I would recommend the
following action be taken in in Copenhagen and believe me I
would love to be there not only to get free sex with
credentials, but instead of violence, which is rarely a
solution, but unfortunately seems to be the path where all
of this is leading. I believe that we can do a lot with our
social media tools and mainly pictures. So take take pictures
of these jabroni is riding around with big BMW signs, take
pictures of the corporations that are involved take pictures,
just the way they do in courts with with your Flickr pictures
and twist the truth, we can do that much better than they could
do and see the climate gate. Yeah, it's been two weeks
without any major network, ABC, NBC or CBS mentioning any of
this, but the news is out there and people are taking note and
the internet is a very powerful tool in all this. So we need to
just just shame them, humiliate them and play their own game.
That is what I would recommend.
That would be a good approach to and it's and it's fun.
It is and it gives us content for the show.
Yeah, but photo taking is fun. You take all kinds of funny
pictures and you can find find some of these delegates going
into the whorehouses yeah be fantastic. Yeah, and
we'll link that right up to the story that is for free and all
you have to do is follow them it's like paparazzi I you know
paparazzi of the world you've made enough money this year on
Taylor Swift and Britney Spears and Brad and Angelina, take your
take your skills and man these guys have got some skills. Take
it up to some lenses. Yeah, take it up to Copenhagen and take
some of these shots I mean here's here's a here's a poor
man's version. Although I love it a lot this is we are changed
New York on the last show I played your clip from we are
changed Chicago as hair l Al Gore is out on his book signing
tour. And of course his new book I can't remember the title and I
don't want to promote you and although I will read it for you.
Absolutely. Cuz I'm not against reading books but we've got to
expose whatever sham and sham claims he's, he's written this
time. This is what people are doing around the country now as
Al Gore speeds around in his in his non hybrid SUV. Here's what
happened at Barnes and Noble in New York and Mr.
Gore Mars has also been experiencing a global warming
press here just says man can't be a factor on the planet on the
planet Mars. Do you think that Mars Global warming isn't the
best? I
love the PR check. No press conference photo op only does
the Shut up slave Don't ask any questions you fall flyer on the
face of the planet the biggest time man on the planet Earth Mr.
Al Gore. Thank you, Cece, actually carbon exchange Maurice
Strong. I love that calling him out on the carbon Exchange,
which of course he's part owner of. Mr. Gore, you're a traitor
to this nation and you know it, you are a traitor. You are
subject to penalty and crimes are in a treason clause. Now
they go outside and they yell at the heckler again. Just getting
into his car. What's the carbon footprint of your 20
room mansion?
These are not the Tea baggers? No, no, these are not the Tea
baggers. These are young people who are pistols left wing
extremists and anarchists. And these this movement which is led
by the media that says we're the only people that defend
everything, I mean, the media with these like these two women
that reference Newsweek and HuffPost and, and people that
write for the New York Times and all these media outlets. They
are the only there that that's these are the guys holding the
fort. They don't want to talk about any of this stuff.
Meanwhile, the far left in the far right and the Nan or kiss
and the right wingers in the teabaggers and everybody in
between are so against us. These guys in Copenhagen aren't going
to know what hit them.
Oh, no. You know what? I disagree? I think they know
exactly what's coming down.
Don't believe this for a minute. I watched gone on Letterman. I
know people that that don't listen to our show. Typically,
they are lockstep in with what the media's told them about
global warming and the facts are in and everybody agrees and you
got to Jeannine garrafa, Lowe's and joy Bay halls we've had them
quoted on the show before but how they're like these people
are totally not expecting anything the same way the naive
boneheads from the WTO didn't expect those riots in Seattle or
anyplace else in the world. Now they go to South America to have
their meetings.
I disagree because when the the G 20. Had their financial summit
in
10 years for them to figure this out. Yeah, but
but when they have their There's some out there in Pittsburgh
there was you saw nothing on the news of all of what all the
horrible things that were taking place as new new weaponry, sound
weapons were being used on people they were pretending to
pick up protesters. So these
guys are not going to be aware that there's any protests except
from nutcases on the right. Dan there and they know they're not
going to be writing they do not know this is going to happen.
I'm telling you, this is gonna be a weird.
Well, I'll tell you one thing the world will not see it on
lamestream media, that's for sure.
No, but the internet's already you know, we'll be seeing it.
They're gonna have to report this one. You want to blame it
on on the right wing or the blaming on the tea bag or?
baggers? Right, exactly. You want to hear how NBC affiliated
MSNBC talks about climate gate Keith Olbermann, the man with
the largest head on television. Yeah. So the story is kind of
irrelevant, because Fox News has been showing pieces of a very
funny clip of Jon Stewart where Jon Stewart says, oh, Al Gore,
the very man who invented the internet is now you know exactly
what we I think John Stuart probably got his material from
us, because we made the very same joke a week before. So but
that's kind of irrelevant, but just listen to how O'Byrne talks
about climate gate and the science being in and you know,
are we crazy and Fox News and Steve Doocy and Brian Kilmeade
he's calling the Fox News Team the worst world's worst people
the week whatever it's all bullshit I don't care about
that. But just listen to the to the narrative they had
a scoop Jon Stewart was denying global warming extraordinarily
juicy said they take a look at us John store The Daily Show
which is a thoroughly bashed Republicans and you know not
bash Democrats really take a shot at Al Gore. And they played
this fight
global warming completely debunked by the very internet
you invented. The irony, the irony, me.
Three chipmunks came out and talked with Michel Martin about
how even John Stuart was saying global warming had been
debunked. Oh, the iron knee. In fact, cluster Fox uses only a
sliver of Stuart's remarks in order to utterly twist their
meaning and to hide the nasty little detail about the fox
climate gates story.
Here's the whole thing. Anyway, so he then he got to look at the
whole clip if you want to. It's so
this is interesting, by the way. What did you notice is
interesting propagandistic use Yeah. Oh, yeah. I
want to hear it again. No, I'm
I'm talking about the way so he called it foxes climate gate.
Yeah. Oh, yeah. Because Fox Mazda fired up somehow. behind
it.
Yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Totally made it dude. This is
and this is what they do every single time is when they go. And
by the way, Fox is run by the same people don't fall into
this.
By the way. Our theory is Fox is a straw man. Run by the
Democrats. It's called
the left right paradigm. And what it is, is to have two sides
of a debate really run by the same globalists, in this case
who are in the background. And it's just to keep you busy to
think that you're you know, your thoughts are being protected or
But meanwhile, if you look at the Tiger Woods index on Fox
News, there's been more about Tiger Woods and about climate
gate. They're doing the same thing. They're they're pumping
your brain full of crap that is unnecessary. I'm reminded
by the way I've I was I was listening to the the Glenn Beck
show once on the radio, and somebody called in and they said
what and they and they brought up No, I'm sorry, was Hannity
But same thing. Hannity is on Fox Two. They call it Hannity.
And they said, Well, you know, but you know about the builder.
The guy mentions The Bilderbergers on the on a
Hannity radio show. And he goes, I never heard of him that I
don't know anything. I don't know what you're talking about.
And I'm getting hung up on the guy. I swear to God, and I'm
thinking what what is that all about? Has
that and then not on the same side? Now? I want to play one
more clip. This is our governor of the United Republic of
California. Get my nation West. He's been brought in of course,
he's all the way seems like such a nice guy. I really want to
like him. But he's at the end of the day. He's just a team
player. And he presented what will happen to California IEA if
we don't immediately tackle climate change, and he's
released a video Have you seen this video John?
No, I didn't even know about this
action in California with Governor Schwarzenegger have a
little listen
to it did we about to take is designed to promote awareness of
the challenges that we face from climate change, and the kind of
things that we can do together to overcome those challenges. By
the way,
the whole video is a it's a Google Earth animation when
we're flying by all of these spots that will be destroyed.
In California, we are already seeing the Signs of a changing
climate. Average temperatures in our state rose nearly two
degrees. And if greenhouse gas emissions are not substantially
reduced, scientists tell us that temperatures in California could
rise an additional seven degrees during this century. So perhaps
one of the
seven degrees I mean, he's using Austrian math. He's the Austrian
School of Economics. There'll be a total of nine degrees.
greatest risks from climate change is a less reliable water
supply that Californians have long struggled with water
shortages, and those shortages. Were selling it I expected to
get worse as temperatures rise. And as we lose our precious era
snowpack projects, and shown here indicate that if global
warming continues unabated, the spring snowpack in the Sierra
Nevada will virtually disappear by the end of the century. This
would pose extreme challenges to water managers, hamper
hydropower generation, and nearly eliminate skiing
snow. No, it eliminates skiing now. What are we gonna do Oh, no
other recreational activities. Now another area of concern for
California is our 1100 miles of scenic coastline. Our coast,
home to over 25 million people is vulnerable to a range of
natural hazards, including storms, high tides, and rising
sea levels. And green technology, we can create a new
economic foundation for the 21st century that is built on clean
fuel, clean energy, and clean cars. Now one terrific example
is for instance, the car company called Tesla Motors. That's the
manufactures cars, the new electric
cars he's promoted, he's promoted. I bet you he got it
for free. And by the way, it's built on a lotus body, which is
not made in California. All they do is the battery and power
management. And of course, they got a huge grant from the
government's
cleaner. England and
and it's a it's an $80,000. Car. Nice. Awesome. That's the that's
the wheels I can afford
mentioned. They can go from zero to 60. In 3.9 seconds.
Yeah, well, that's kind of good, because we
know Wait a minute. And so he's advocating reckless driving.
Yes, of course, zero to 60. In 3.9 seconds, you need to have
this vehicle. Of course,
it goes zero to 60 in 3.9 seconds as you age. So as the
governor, the chief executive of the state of California is
bragging about the high high speed vehicle that is clearly
dangerous. Yes. Accelerating at that rate of speed. Yes, that's
Oh, well, whatever
proud that because of California's aggressive
environmental policies, Tesla is manufacturing their cars, and
creating the great jobs right here in California. In fact, a
wave of Green Innovation is washing over our state, we are
proving that it is possible to protect both the environment and
the economy. That's his only example.
And the end of video,
what is his promotion for the Tesla Motor Company? Apparently,
nothing else in the state of California battery technology,
nothing except a Tesla's zero to 60 and 3.9 seconds or whatever
it is. And that's a good thing. $80,000 car that's our that's
our contribution. And
that's it, and we're sticking to it. We've done it we're in all
right. Meanwhile, the climate gate has reached NASA was
researcher threatened. Now this is from Fox, by the way, but
it's from Fox and Friends, which has all the hot chicks in the
morning. I mean,
gate now reach NASA,
that researcher Chris Horner. He's a senior fellow at the
Competitive Enterprise Institute, and the author,
author of Red Hot lies.
Thank you for joining us.
Another book I gotta read. Is any of the date can we rely on
any of this data anymore? After what we've heard from the
emails, etc? What can we trust now?
Probably just the satellite data, which goes back 30 years,
which was put up in place at great expense to you and being
in response to the claimed consensus over catastrophic,
manmade global cooling. So you can look at the satellite data,
but what NASA has been doing is that true
John 30 years ago, did they put up those satellites to track
global cooling? Do you recall that?
I don't recall it, but I'm sure it was one of the one of the
rationales when the global cooling thing was a big deal.
It was fairly similar to what's been exposed in the UK. In 2007.
When I first issued this Freedom of Information Act request, a
Canadian statistician named Steven McIntyre saw NASA
increasingly hysteric about us temperatures, even though they
were not in fact, going up with anyone with a pulse knows
they've been going down. So he notified NASA, and they
corrected their temperature data from the US without issuing a
press release for once and then a few days later went back in
and re fudged the numbers. And so what we've been seeking is
the underlying data Under the computer code and rotations to
the code, what are they using to constantly change historical
data? And also, what was their internal discussion about, oh,
should we correct the data? What will be the implications if we
do and so on? Right, and NASA has been remarkably not
forthcoming. In fact, last night, two senators Vitter and
Inhofe from Louisiana and Oklahoma sent a letter to the
NASA Inspector General, saying guard these documents don't
destroy anything. Don't be too British on this as they
were clad. I liked that mean, don't be British about climate
gate. I
love doing like, let's see what really went on the Inspector
General is supposed to be the Overseer and not affiliated. So
we'll have to see what happens with that. But let's take a look
at some of this data that you say has changed at NASA. So
first, 1998 was the hottest year in its records for the
contiguous 48 states. Is that true? Or did that change?
They changed hottest right they've changed the top three,
the top law the entire ranking several times. So their defense
now let's just resolve where we are now. They're claiming Well,
whatever. It's just within a few 100 To a degree to the 1930s.
Okay, well, you prove too much. You're telling us it's now as
hot as it was in the 30s. Great. I fail to see the alarm. The
trend is going down. What happened Gretchen is they they
were adding different stations. They've been slowly backing out
high altitude rural temperature stations to focus on
thermometers sitting in the middle of cities and on airport
runways and in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, for a barbecue. Why
would NASA be
involved in this whole media?
Right, that's a very good question. NASA became
increasingly a global warming, taxpayer funded agency with the
relative decline in space funding. And when you're talking
about $7 billion dollars a year writ large and climate related
research scientists are people to they began sexing things up.
And this gentleman James Hansen, who is the custodian of the data
has a history of yelling that anybody named George Bush, who's
a president is muzzling him, the first one, the second one didn't
matter. He's a bit of a committed radical global warming
alarmist. And he began sexing things up, it appears during
George W. Bush's presidency. So there's
a couple of links in the show notes that follow this in a
little more depth. I just thought it was interesting that
that was on Fox and Friends, which I don't watch, but was
sent the YouTube clip. But just to explain what all of this is
about this dates back. And there's a fantastic story in
under the climate gate heading in the shownotes as well.
Fantastic story about how this is tracked back to the Club of
Rome. And can you give us some background on the Club of Rome,
John?
The Club of Rome? Well, this is an old organization, this goes
back to the 70s, I think, yes, the club of there was a couple
of things that were going on back there, the the hysteria
back in the 60s and 70s was mostly about population control.
And if I'm not mistaken, the Club of Rome had a clock, I
think that there was a doomsday clock that by the year 2000,
we're gonna have too many people. And we wouldn't be able
to stay, we can have massive famines. And there was a
Stanford professor, I think it was early ottoman, something
like that somebody will know in the chat room, who wrote a book
on zero population growth. And this has been the underlying
kind of the underlying theme. I think it still exists this
theme, although never got anywhere, because we didn't have
the famines, he predicted we didn't have the die offs, we
didn't have all these weirdnesses that he was saying
was going to happen by the year 2000, the Club of Rome was
behind this, and they, they would predicted the end of the
universe was over the world as we know it because of population
growth. And then then came along the next iteration of scaring
the public, which was the upcoming Ice Age, but nobody
could you know, profit from that. So they switched it over
to the global warming, because then you could create this cap
and trade thing with the carbon credits and carbon footprints
and all the rest of it. And but underlying it, there's still
this, we have to kill the public, we have to kill people,
we have to have one world government, we have to, we have
to kill people, we got to get the population down to you know,
something like a few million, and this as opposed to these
billions. So there's really a sinister thing under
underscoring all this and all these robotic people that just
lock step into whatever old movie and catch him tells him to
say, which are that we're really controlling things, you know,
about, you know, we need governance, global governance is
the key word you keep running into and then you have, you
know, population control, we should only have one baby per
two people, even though we know this is destroying certain
cultures already by having not enough births. So,
so the Club of Rome published a number of documents and they
were convinced that the only way to get people on board and with
the program, and I believe the reduction had it's some
ridiculous number like you can only have 150 million people on
the planet or so there was some ridiculously low number of
course now around more than 6 billion. Their whole published
documents state that we have to scare people with imagery of a
Floods, famine, death destruction, we have to fear
people into getting on board with the program. And as you
correctly stated, they tried that. Well, of course, the media
wasn't quite as good as it was back then in the 70s.
And you know, the media was actually much better back then
they had more controlled. Well, well, at the same time there
weren't so lockstep into it. They weren't so politically
locked in to a essentially a religious philosophy.
I'm sorry, I meant it from the other for the for to propagate
their propagandist agenda. The media was not appropriate at the
time because of course, the news media actually reported on news
and
coverage story facts, they
Yeah, they covered stories.
They weren't writing about how it's going to be so much fun to
go to Copenhagen.
Yes. So they, so they push this, they tried it with the the new
ice age with global cooling. But it wasn't really until I would
have to say Al Gore with an inconvenient truth that they
really, you know, caught the spark there. And the thing that
I have to remind people of is that we do have the power to
turn this around. Because at the end of the day, you know, the 6
billion versus maybe a million of these Yahoo reptiles who are
running around, you know, we totally have power in numbers.
And what we're doing with with programs like this is, you know,
it may only be 150 million at the end of the day, that'll be
left over, but at least we won't be controlled. Well, we'll be
alive and we'll be awake. And in order to continue doing that, we
need your help. And this is where I'd like to thank our
executive producer Richard from Tasmania for his donation for
today's show, as well as our Associate Executive Producer,
Todd Simmons, you had some more first time he closed the gate.
The gate to the gate to the club.
And just to add to what you said there, John, the the end game
for these globalists stemming from way back in the 70s, the
Club of Rome is to kill people and, and to be rich, not
necessarily in that order.
Well, the rich part is really what they're after. And, you
know, global governance helps them out some because it makes
it easier, they don't want to do any work. Alright, let me read a
couple of people that donated this week, but I'm gonna go
right to Richard from Tasmania's note he sent us a note. He says
it's 52 weeks and $55 a week worth every cent, which is
sounds right in. In other news recently, Malcolm Turnbull bull
was removed from the leadership of the Liberal Party, which is
to American standards as a conservative party, or
Republican, kind of what you may not know is he is an ex merchant
banker who helped Goldman Sachs, which I suspect is your primary
reason he was so supportive of cap and trade, and the reason he
had to be removed.
Remember that Goldman Sachs is running the the $6 billion fund
owned by Al Gore, which has a huge interest in the only carbon
Exchange, which was given a grant by a foundation at the
time that President Obama was a board member.
Right? Anyway, so the the seat went, seat is Wentworth and sit
in Sydney in his very trendy, socially progressive and odds
with a socially conservative party. Kind of awkward sense.
He's a bit like John McCain, who looks for support from the
progressive left mainstream media who hate the party. He
represents basically screwed himself. So that's a little
little insight into what's going on. Australians are just, you
know, they're at the edge of being screwed over, but they
seem to be
angry. And have you ever been Australia? John? I don't think
so. Right? Yeah. No, I Oh, yes. trillia and I fell in love
immediately with that country. I fell in love with the people. Of
course, I wasn't really in any of the big cities I was more in
the was in the outback for for about a week. But even in in
Sydney, it was just the people, they work hard, play hard.
That's all they want to do. You know, they don't take any
bullshit. If you talk bullshit, you know, they do exactly what
we do. They've got a very simple formula for that.
Our formula is this. We go out, we add people in the mouth.
And I'd say that's the Australian formula.
So let me go through a few names Sir John Matthews, one of our
knights gave us another $50 Don't say Sir John, to say the
following on show 150 You incorrect did incorrectly ducted
me as a kiwi I am in fact the Aussie from North Carolina.
Here's a $50 donation please correct this error.
Like that is a huge faux pa there's a little issue between
Oh yeah, no, we were sorry. And And Vincent Dunn. Other $50
donors Vincent Dunstan of New South Wales Australia. Bryant
March. Schick March. Mar Mar c h e w. K A. March Shuka Machuca
Mochica Brian Martica that's what it's gotta be a
good prep there on the show Johnny Boy Yeah, I
just I had it earlier. And then he says he gave us 5555 To cheer
Adam up. Peter tau days to T Ayas from Sugarland, Texas
Manfred hurtin to burger from North writing a Gauteng, South
Africa. This is a long ways to go. John Terada, Pasadena John,
Theo, Theo. Brother. This is another Australian by the way, t
HEODOR. Sen. Theo, Theo. I can't catch it. Got it. Got it,
either.
Oh, hold on a second. John. Um, my daughter's just calling me
continued. I'll be right back.
Okay. He'll get that back. Mike Westerfield that will get that
name pronounced hopefully. Who's in Enderlin, North Dakota.
Another $50 from Tristan Lennon from Wagga Wagga, New South
Wales. David Kerwin, who is in if I flip over the page Sook.
British Columbia BC souk is a little place up on the Vancouver
Islands very interesting. There's a area called souk
Harbor, which is very picturesque I'd recommend
visiting one of the prettiest places in the country. We've got
Armand Boyer from Veen, Austria, Paul love, Mechanicsville,
Virginia, Lawrence Kevin, San Leandro, California who says
that he's donating money even though it makes his blood
pressure rise. He's the blood pressure guy. And then we have
the people who have added more than 50 which are absorbed
trying a new system here. That's why I'm so confused. Again, we
had Todd Simmons who is are one of the executive producers from
eight mile plains, Queensland. We have John Smith, who is in
St. Petersburg, Florida and runs the Monroe Internet services 100
Sorry
about that.
He's Ron Paul. Fan. He'll Marsh nighter Langley British Columbia
9669 In palindrome. Steven Powell smackers PE L S M AE K
ers. I think I get that pronounced correctly. 100 He
thinks I can't pronounce it. And he says we can give it to l
pelsall. Or credit he gave 180 Thank you very much for that.
And finally as Scott from South Woodford Essex gave 100
And I have one from Italy my sister Willow is now a
subscriber I believe she's a $5 a month subscriber I've been
I've been given her shit saying hey man, you know what's what's
up with that? And she gave me the top 10 reasons she
subscribed to no agenda number 10 I don't like being called a
leecher in public. And number nine it's only 16 and a half
percent of what I pay monthly to save the children. Number eight
no agenda is the only program that makes me laugh out loud and
that one I like the best number seven there is no Starbucks in
Italy. Number six John does the best jingle during the UFO Alien
minute Can you give a little five I actually know where my
brother is in the world and what he's up to number four the mayor
of Florence claims that he will remove all parking meters number
three with my short commute of 20 minutes I get two days of
entertainment number two number two I didn't have any small
change to get rid of to close my PayPal account and the number
one reason I subscribed to no agenda is so that Adam can quit
his day job. That's real love right there. Man that system.
So you can go to no agenda show.com or dvorak.org/n A we're
also going to set up another page because apparently
divorce.org/n A which is really the nexus of where these were
the monies collected apparently does not appear in South Korea
anymore. No, no, of course not. And we're also Russia's sketchy
so we're gonna set up another drop site, but divorce.org/n A
and no agenda show.com And I'll have the new links to some other
webpage that I think we can make sure that shows up in foreign
country blocked Horeca uncensored because the word
uncensored itself apparently, it seems internet is doomed. Let's
face it, the internet is booming it
is. So you know, and we really need your help. Because we've we
have a very, very simple business model. It is what
originally the national treasure and PR started out with is based
upon donations and people feeling good about getting the
real story. We have no agenda. We don't give a crap. We're not
left. We're not right. We're just two dudes, essentially. You
know, we like free sex like everybody else. And we would
love to go to Copenhagen and that would be a great perk of
the job. would be yes, it would be fantastic. But meanwhile,
here's what's happening in your government. Waxman what's his
name? What's his first name? Henry. Henry. Yeah, Henry.
Waxman is now introducing bills into into the into the house the
house? Yeah, yeah. into the house to subsidize main
lamestream media.
Yeah, of course, because keep these liars alive. Oh, yeah.
Because
well, you know, we need the news to report the truth and we need
real journalism, the internet no good. You can't have any of
that. So they're gonna become tax breaks for the subsidies in
Gitmo nation East in the low lower portion in the
Netherlands. 60. young journalists are 100% subsidized
by the government. This is the Ministry of Truth in the making.
And you have to be very, very, very careful when these things
take place. Even if you're skeptical of the truth that we
speak or the the topics that we debunk this, disseminate, pull
up deconstruct whatever he construct whatever you want to
call it. You cannot deny that that is not a good idea. This is
an advertising whatever you want to call it.
This is Atlas Shrugged, real life. Let's listen once again to
the chairwoman of NPR as she talks about their funding. Hey,
moving on to money. How are NPR is corporate underwriting
revenues holding up in the recession? And what about
foundation grants
to different stories? Underwriting is underwriting is
is down it's down for everybody. I mean, this is this is this is
the area that is most down for us is in is in sponsorship
underwriting advertising, call it whatever you want
to call it, whatever you want. It's called advertising. And
it's big companies like General Electric,
right, we are soliciting your money.
So we need your money to continue. We need your money to
expand. I've actually I have spent some of my more of my time
working on the stream. We haven't selected a stream
manager yet, but I've at least put some formatting together.
Here everything is going to be up under the by the first of
January. Oh,
geez, Louise, I can't even get you to find the password to the
website with the kind of
I think we forgot to mention Brian Ferguson in Irvine, he
gave us 120.
Cool. Well, we appreciate it. But
we also want to thank the people who subscribe we get a lot of $5
subscribers, which is a good thing and we that that helps
more pretty much a lot. And then there's a lot of people to just
give you know, miscellaneous mounts and we seriously
appreciate it. Go Yeah, no, there's to pay bills.
Yes, it does. Then we end but we'd also accept free sex
donations.
All you have to do is go to Copenhagen I've shipped get
credentialed.
You think you don't think I'm on some kind of list up there? I
don't know about that.
Nobody listens to the show. Yeah, none of the people on that
side of the argument listen to this show. None of them do. We
can say whatever we want. There's another
show that that I listened to. It listened to a lot of wacky
programs being I read wacky books to you. I don't think that
you can get an Atlas Shrugged nation. You can call that one
wacky I think Atlas Shrugged has more to it than just go on what
go on with what you're saying. Atlas Shrugged. Atlas Shrugged.
Atlas Shrugged. Then Sarah Palin this book? You know, there was I
got more out of Atlas Shrugged than going rogue. Let's put it
that way. So this is a program that is it's a religious program
and I am a student of Religious Broadcasters. I
don't need the rationale just would tell us just give me a
break. Let
me see. What is your problem?
I think we should do a book that shirt shirt pants book called
going broke.
Because that's the direction we're headed. I like that.
Alright, as the show called, hosted by a guy named Steve
Quale. It's called Voices from the heartland. And he had this
former Kansas State State Trooper on Greg Everson. And I
was alarmed when when I heard with this guy had to say he says
that right now and this is totally in line. With with all
the Goldman Sachs executives getting guns, right now,
Department of Homeland Security, the military, all of these armed
forces are in fact they had a meeting yesterday some kind of
emergency meeting to prepare for civil, huge civil unrest. And
this of course is all coordinated by North comm. And
which I think is I don't know if that that's a parallel to
department of homeland, homeland security. And what they're
talking about is the possible implementation of OPERATION
GARDEN PLOT.
Have you ever Yeah, operations you got me on this one?
Okay. OPERATION GARDEN PLOT. stems from a second little piece
of commercial there. From what the hell is that? Sorry, trying
to find what are you doing open a webpage and then shit just
starts the play, man. I don't know what's going on. I'm trying
to hate that. Like me vo but at least you go on there because
you're you want something to play. Okay, so operation. garden
plot. The President is authorized by the Constitution
and title 10 to suppress insurrections, rebellions and
domestic violence. After issuing a cease and desist order, the
President issued an executive order that directs the Attorney
General and the s. E. C. d. F, I'm not sure what that is to
take appropriate steps to disperse insurgents. We know
what they are. They are Ron Paul supporters, people who walk
around with the copies of the Constitution, people who are
veterans, people who are gun owners, people who do wacky
shows on the internet, to just to restore law and order. The
Attorney General is then responsible to coordinate the
federal response to domestic civil disturbances, the
restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act no longer apply to
federal troops, executing the orders of the President to quell
the disturbance in accordance with the rules of the use of
force and approved by the Department of Defense general
counsel and the attorney general.
So what does this mean? So garden plot
is code. And if you know anyone in the military, ask them about
garden plot, it is code for bombing, civilian areas,
airstrikes, essentially, and this is not going to happen in
in California or New York or anywhere people actually read
the New York Times and are on board with the program. This is
going to you're going to the gun owners will get knocks on their
doors. This is going to happen where the quote teabaggers live,
this is going to happen in the Midwest. But what's what's
disturbing, and it's a two hour show. It was very, very long.
And there's a lot of religious stuff in there. But they were
getting reports while they were on air from military personnel
saying yeah, this is absolutely true. They are holding these
emergency meetings, they believe with the next 45 to 60 days,
OPERATION GARDEN PLOT will have to be implemented because there
is so much unrest now, which is not being reported anywhere on
Fox News either. And is not teabaggers it is American
civilians. They are so angry, so broke, so disillusioned so
disenchanted so disenfranchised, that they are going to stop
paying taxes, and that they're going to take their weapons, and
they're going to say Enough already. And law enforcement.
The way I view it, about half of them are probably 100% on board
with the program and we'll be tasing, you will be telling you
what to do. Luckily, the other half is probably you can you
imagine if you're a soldier, and you're ordered to point your gun
at an American civilian, can you imagine that? Can you imagine
how that must feel Yemen in the 60s? Well,
it could happen again. And I fear that we're getting very
close, please read through all the links that are under Gitmo
in the show notes at no agenda show.com currie.com and divorce
act.org read through this, because the Posse Comitatus Act
of 1878 is extremely important. This means that the US military
cannot be used against its own people. Yet there's enough
lawyering that has gone on that this can be changed at the drop
of a hat and you gotta admit, John, the unrest is in the air.
I'm not seeing it. No, you're not
seeing it on television. You're but I'm reading it. I'm feeling
it. I feel it myself. Yeah, I feel it and I watch what's going
on like you know, the We've been robbed by Wall Street bankers.
We're about to get by the way, you shouldn't be feeling it.
Because if you're following anything about the Health Care
Insurance Act bill up your arse, then you know that the whole
plan is is to kill old people. In fact, Bernanke was being
interrogated on for his reinstatement as Chairman of the
Federal Reserve. And here's what he thought we should do. Let me
just kill this browser. So we don't have that other sound. He
gets what he answered when we thought we should do about about
the deficit, and how should we get rid of all these problems we
have in finance, the
I recall the 90s, because I was here that there's only two
really ways you can deflect this deficit. And that's either by
cutting expenditures or raising income taxes or other forms of
taxes, not Bernanke, Bernanke, his answer is coming to reduce
deficits. Well, well, just just logically, there are other kinds
of taxes besides income don't know i
I'm sorry. This is the one I didn't
welcome a stern was the trajectory of federal spending
and Federal Reserve policy more appropriate at the end of 2000,
at the end of 1999, than it is today? Well, we certainly faced
a lot more challenges. Since then, recall, we had a surplus,
we did have a surplus. Now. Unemployment rates that were
about 4.6%. We had economic growth and income growth across
the spectrum at every level. So what happened? Well, going back
to some of the themes that Senator Shelby raised, the stock
market, boom was not sustainable it, it popped, and that
contributed to the recession of 2001. And now, of course, we've
had a financial crisis and a deep recession, which is, which
has dragged down tax revenues and created needs for for
supporting people out of work and other important objectives.
So a lot of what's happening right now, of course, these
enormous deficits we have this year and next year are not
permanent, they're reflecting the current situation. But some
of it will be permanent unless we begin to address the
particularly the entitlement issue and the aging issue.
Okay, the aging issue. And then he goes on to say, and that's
the one I want to play. I guess I screwed it up. He says, I'm
not saying we should, you know, get rid of old people. But
that's, that's exactly what's happening half half.
He said that, yeah, fine. I don't want to say we don't want
to kill, don't
kill rams, which are growing, get rid of going in, in 1015
years, the entire federal budget will be entitlements and
interest, and there won't be any money left over for defense or
any of the other activities. So clearly, we're facing a very
difficult structural problem, and that we have an aging
society and rising healthcare costs, and the government has
very substantial obligations. I'm not in any way advocating
unfair treatment of, of the elderly, who have worked all
their lives and certainly deserve them all. But if there
are ways to restructure or strengthen these programs that
reduce costs, I think that's extraordinarily important for us
to try to achieve.
I'm not advocating getting rid of elderly people. That's the
way I hear that, John. Yeah. Which reminds me of this little
ditty,
because it will not put seniors in a position of being put to
death by their government,
which is exactly what's going to happen. They're gonna have a
$500 billion reduction in Medicare.
5 million debate. It was all over the C span. I tried to get
some poignant clips. I didn't get too many but I did get a
funny clip. Which is Bacchus was on the floor and I swear to God,
this was like, two in the afternoon Eastern time, I
believe. I think he was up all night and I think he was drunk.
slurring his words Burt's I'm sorry, what did you bring me
slurring his words? And it was just a boring I know what he was
talking about. But But the funny thing is, he deferred to Frank.
And I have to say, Now, nobody's picked us up. But Frank, and
apparently still does have a sense of humor. And I mean, you
could ridicule him for what he did in this little ditty that
I'm going to play, but I thought it was actually kind of amusing,
and it was light, but at the same time, you know, kind of
ludicrous played.
I don't know it's time I've left. His book is The Senator
has 16 seconds left. Okay.
Go wizards
probably say a lot, but I see the SER Minnesota, anxiously
sitting over in the corner. And I mean, we could give him a
couple of hours. It was because we'll be gone. It'll be gone.
Get off the stage.
I do have the microphone and I thank you for the 16 seconds.
And I'd like to now I've used it up my time the senator from
Wyoming.
I thought that was funny. Yeah, that is funny. That is good. But
if you listen to Bacchus, I
mean, the guy was wasted. But it was still in the morning. Maybe
he's just tired. I think it
was two in the evening. I missed two. I think it's Tuesday
because it was supposedly live. And I was watching it. Oh, he's
one
of those elderly, we should get rid of him, because that'll help
our deficit because we won't have any money left over for
war.
So I have one more clip. All right. And we haven't talked
about the swine flu at all.
Oh, well, if you want, we can certainly. It'll be a real
minute. It'll be a real minute.
Yeah. Now, we were watching dollhouse because they had
they're running two shows in a row. And we're trying to figure
out whether the show is really worth following. It's kind of a
weird story done by Josh Whedon, who did Firefly and some other
crazy things. But so we're watching this and we have the
evil person who's got the one of the girls locked down and they
got these memory things, it's changed your brain with these
things, and they can make you think certain things and they
they are locked down. They're gonna shove this these memories
into her to torture her. And and this is the way it plays out
when you watch it on television, and I have a commentary about
how this works. So
we took your memories
you want me to play the whole thing without playing the
whole thing? No, no, all the whole thing.
I'll go back to the beginning. Here you go. Now we took
your memories. This is a no this is one of my memories. Review.
This is the last time I saw you. Because what you did to me, not
just to my arm to me want you to feel this or something or some
pain?
Sharing, it's with kids do that every year an average of 4
million kids get the flu and miss out on sharing. That's why
we created goto share.com. To learn about preventing
influenza, and discuss your latest vaccination options,
okay can stop it. It took us about halfway through this
commercial before he realized that they cut to a commercial
commercial,
it was really slick. I almost didn't hear it in the audio was
like, huh,
they bring up this this moment where you're incredibly wired
into the story because you don't know what's going to happen and
your tensor into your your your receptive to see what's going to
happen next. And then they cut to a commercial it takes you at
least 10 seconds to realize it's a commercial you don't know. And
it's a blue thing. I was stunned that they would do this. Is it
like, Stan, this is Fox, by the way? Oh, of course
it is. And the biggest secret in television, which I've been in
all my life is that the programming is only there to
fill up the gaps between the commercials. And I believe this
borders on breaking FCC regulation, I believe there has
to be a clear distinction between programming and
advertising. Not that anyone gives a crap. But then the whole
the whole sharing thing. And you
know, you got the point that it was a commercial by the time it
was half done. But it was the fact that you were so you're
you're set up to be receptive to a message,
memories, new messages coming in attention. This is what I'll go
back to the Zen TV experiment. I got to put it in the show notes.
Again, this is what television does, it sets you up to receive
these messages, not just the advertising, by the way in the
programming itself. It is all mind control. All of it, every
single bit of it. All mind control.
And by the way, this is the reason we were asking for
donations, we do not want to bring advertising into the
picture.
Now there's something I wanted to do something different, John,
since our time is up. And I was really on the fence about this,
but I think I think we might consider doing this. So I spend
a lot of time yesterday. And as you write you know, as Mickey
says, Did you watch ugly people on TV again? Well, I was going
to say yeah, you know, because that's her description of C span
is ugly. people on TV. And so I look at the Bernanke
confirmation hearings. And this is about two hours. As as they
say, on C span, this program lasts about two hours. I love
that it has funny. It's like, huh, kind of you don't know.
It's been pre recorded. And the representative from Arkansas,
Jim Bunnings, did a 13 minute slam session on Bernanke, which
was so truthful. So right on the money. So exactly what you and I
have been discussing for the past two years, takes Bernanke
shoves a poker up his butt, twist it reheats it shoves it
down his throat. And it's such a beautiful piece of work. And I
was turned on to it, because I read a, I think, a Bloomberg
report, which said, you know, it was really funny during the
confirmation hearings for Bernanke, when Jim Bunnings
inadvertently called him Greenspan, instead of instead of
Bernanke, which he just said, yeah, that was a Freudian slip.
And that was the only thing that was reported on this 13 minute
monologue, which I was floored by, I was like, Oh, my God, this
is amazing. This had people have to see this. And, of course,
nowhere, the only thing that they show on the news is the
little guffaw where he calls him Greenspan. And since our time is
up, John, the only place you can hear this kind of stuff is right
here, because you're not going to catch it on C span, there is
a link in the show notes to the entire two hour confirmation
hearing, with your permission, as partner on this program. I'd
like to play that 14 1314 minutes, just at the end of the
show. So if people are really like that don't want to know
about it. They're done with us, you know, want to listen to
that, then they can just skip over it or whatever. But maybe
we should just play that in its entirety. I don't think by the
way that you could actually listen to it without without
wanting to stop and discuss it. Are you getting for that?
Because
we want to stop and discuss I think some of these things
should just stay I think we should close the show. Okay,
with a goodbye. And then you play that and then you cut the
stream.
And then I cut the stream just like that. Maybe I shut it off.
Yeah, that and then you have people who have it, you know,
they have it on their cars, you'll have it on the on the
post, too.
Yeah, what I'll also do is I'll put the sound file up for
download so that you can send that to people. So they can put
it on their iPod. You say Hey, this is like 13 minutes, you
should just really listen to it. I also left in his response, by
the way, and then Christopher Dodd even throws his buddy under
the bus for a second. And, and I don't want to go it's you cannot
write this stuff. You cannot write this stuff.
And a grantley None of the immediate people can report it
either. Not a
single one has reported on this other than the gaffe of him
saying, Oh, Mr. Greenspan, that's all. That's all that was
reported. So we're gonna play that. It is a special bonus item
brought to you through quite a bit of work. takes time to do
all that shit. So anyway, coming to you from Gitmo nation, West
San Francisco, California, the crackpot command center. I'm
Adam curry,
and from Northern Silicon Valley, where it's actually now
Sunny on a day where it's supposed to be pouring rain. I'm
John C. Dvorak,
we will talk to you again on Thursday, bring you more of what
you won't hear on the lamestream media right here. No agenda.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Four years ago, when you became when
you came before the Senate for confirmation to be chairman of
the Federal Reserve, I was the only senator to vote against
you. In fact, I was the only senator that even raised serious
concerns about you. I oppose you, because I knew you would
continue the legacy of Alan Greenspan. And I was right. But
I did not know how right I would be and could not imagine how
wrong you would be in the following four years. The ring
Greenspan legacy on monetary policy was breaking from the
Taylor rule to provide easy money and thus inflate bubbles.
Not only did you continue that policy when you took control the
Fed, but you supported every Greenspan rate decision when you
were on the Fed earlier this decade. Sometime you even wanted
to go farther, to provide easier money than Chairman Greenspan. A
reason and as recently as a letter you sent me two weeks
ago, you still refuse to admit fed action played any role in
inflating the housing bubble, despite the overwhelming
evidence and the consensus of economists to the contrary. And
in your effort to keep fill In the Punchbowl to keep filling
the Punchbowl, you cranked up the printing presses to buy
mortgage securities, Treasury securities, commercial paper and
other assets from Wall Street. Those purchases by the way led
to some nice profits for the Wall Street banks and dealers
who sold them to you. And the GSE. Purchases seem to be
illegal since the Federal Reserve Act allows only the
purchase of securities backed by the government on consumer
protection, the Greenspan policy was don't do it. You went along
with his policy before you were chairman and you continue to get
continued after you were promoted. The most glaring
example is to it took you two years to finally regulate
subprime mortgages. After Chairman Greenspan did nothing
for 12 years. Even then, you only acted after pressure from
Congress. And after it was clear, subprime mortgages were
at the heart of the economic meltdown, and other consumer
protection issues you only acted as the time approached for your
renomination to be Fed chairman, Alan Greenspan refuse to look
for bubbles or to try to do anything other than to create
them. Likewise, it is clear from your statements over the last
four years that you failed to spot the housing bubble despite
many warnings. Chairman Greenspan's attitude toward
regulating Banks was much like his attitude toward consumer
protection. Instead of close supervision of the biggest and
most dangerous banks ignored the growing balance sheets and
increasing risk. You did no better. In fact, under your
watch, every one of the major banks failed, our would have
failed. If you had not bailed them out. I'm character Tampa on
derivatives. Chairman Greenspan and other Clinton administration
officials attacking me quick roughly born when she dared to
raise concerns about the growing risk, they succeeded in changing
the law prevent her or anyone else from effectively regulating
derivatives. And I'm here to after taking over the Fed, you
did not see any need for more substantial regulation of
derivatives until it was clear that they were headed in to the
financial meltdown, thanks in part to those products. The
Greenspan policy on transparency was talking a lot. Use plenty of
numbers, but say nothing. Things were so bad one TV network, even
tried to guess his thoughts. By looking at the briefcase he
carried to work. You promise Congress more transparency, when
you came to the job? You promised more transparency when
you came begging for TARP? To be fair, you have published more
information than before. But those efforts are inadequate.
And you still refuse to provide details on the Feds bail out
last year, on all the toxic waste that you have bought. And
Chairman Greenspan sold the Feds independence to Wall Street to
the so called green scoopin. Put whatever Wall Street needed a
boost. Allen was there. But you went even farther than that,
when you bowed to political pressure of the Bush and Obama
administration's and turn the fed into an arm of the Treasury.
under your watch the Bernanke put became a bailout for all
large financial institutions, including including many foreign
banks. And you put the printing presses into overdrive, to fund
the government spending and handout cheap money to your
Masters on Wall Street, which they use to rake in record
profits, while ordinary Americans in small businesses
can't even get loans for their everyday needs. Now, I want to
read a quote to you Mr. Greens, Mr. Bernanke. That's a Freudian
slip, believe me. Here's a quote. I believe that the tools
available to the banking agencies including the ability
to require adequate capital and an effective banking
receivership process, are sufficient to allow the agencies
to minimize the systemic risks associated with large banks.
Moreover, the agencies have made clear that no bank is too big to
fail. So that bank management shareholders and uninsured debt
holders understand that they will not escape the consequences
of excessive risk taking. In short, although vigilance is
necessary, I believe the systemic risks inherent in the
banking system is well managed and well controlled. That should
sound familiar to you. Since it was part of your response to a
question, I asked about the systemic risk of large financial
institutions. At your last confirmation hearing. I'm going
to ask that the full question and answer be included in
today's hearing record. Now, if that statement was true, and you
had acted, according to it, I might be supporting your
nomination today. But since then, you have decided that just
about every large bank, investment bank, insurance
company, and even some industrial companies are too big
to fail. Rather than making management shareholders and debt
holders feel the consequences of their risk taking, you bailed
them out. In short, you are the definition of a moral hazard.
Instead of taking that money, and let me get to consumers, and
cleaning up their balance sheets, the banks state started
to pocket record profits, and pay out billions of dollars in
bonuses to their management. Because you bowed to pressure
from the banks, and refused to resolve them, or forced them to
clean up their balance sheets, and clean up the management, you
have created zombie banks that are only enriching their traders
and executives, you are repeating the same mistakes of
Japan and the 1990s on a much larger scale, while sowing the
seeds for the next bubble. In the same letter where you refuse
to admit any responsibility for inflating the housing bubble,
you also admitted you do not have an exit strategy for all
the money you have printed, and the securities you have boss
bought. That sounds to me like you intend to keep popping
propping up the banks for as long as they want. Even if that
were not true. And I'm a little over my time, but this is very
important. The AIG bailout alone is reason enough to send you
back to Princeton. First, you told us AIG and its creditors
had to be bailed out because they pose a systemic risk,
largely because of the credit default swap portfolio. Those
credit default swaps, by the way, are over the counter
derivatives that the Fed did not want regulated. Well, according
to the tarp Inspector General, it turns out the Fed was not
concerned about the financial conditions of the credit default
swap partners when you decided to pay them off at par, not at a
discount, but at 100%. In fact, the Inspector General makes it
clear that no serious efforts were made to get the partners to
take haircuts, and one bank offered to take a haircut and
you declined it. I can only think of two possible reasons
you would not make.
Then New York President fed Geithner tried to save the
taxpayers some money by serious negotiating, negotiating, or at
least taking up UBS on their offer of a haircut. Sadly, those
two reasons are incompetence are a desire to secretly funnel more
money to a select few firms, notably Goldman Sachs, Merrill
Lynch, and a handful of large European banks. I cannot
understand why you'd not seek European governments
contribution to this bailout of their banking system. From
monetary policy to regulation, consumer protection,
transparency and independence. Your time as Fed chairman has
been a failure. You stated time and again during the housing
bubble, that there was no bubble. After the bubble burst,
you repeatedly claim the fallout would be small and you kill
clearly did not support the systemic risk that you claimed
the Fed was supposed to be looking out for. When I come
where I come from, we punish failure not where rewarded. That
is certainly the way it was when I played baseball, and it is the
way across all America presently, judging by the
current treasurer secretary, some may think Washington does
reward failure. But that should not be the case. I will do
everything I can to stop your nomination and drag out this
process. As long as I can. We must put an end to your and the
Feds failure. And there is no better time than now. Your Fed
has become the Creature from Jekyll Island. Thank you
get a respond to that. Let me just
correct one point. First. I'm not sure. I think there's was
some misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the sick
tarps report. But we absolutely believed that AIG is failure
would be an enormous systemic risk and would have imposed
enormous damage not just on the financial system. And this, this
is the key point on the entire US economy and on every
American, it is not reasonable to talk about letting large
firms fail as if that would have no effect on credit extension.
And on the broader economy, the Lehman example should be enough
for everybody. With respect to the counterparties. There's a
long discussion there, which I won't go into. But I'll just
point out just once one issue you raised, UBS offered a 2%
discount if and only if all the other counterparties would
accept one. That was not the case. We did our best to get a
reduction there. But given that AIG was not bankrupt, and given
that we were not going to abuse our supervisory power, we really
had no way to to create substantial discount. Mr.
Chairman, me, I don't want to take any more time. But the fact
of the matter is AIG. AIG was 80%. Owned as at that time, I
don't by the federal government, I want to
just say and I would quickly turn to others, let me say, and
I disagree with my friend and colleague from Kentucky about
the conclusion to what happened your nomination. But I gotta
tell you, Mr. Chairman, and we're going through that period
of that time, when all the headlines were about the 160 $8
million in bonuses of about AIG, and virtually no reporting
whatsoever, the counterparty issue, and the fact of the
matter that we allowed 100 cents on the dollar, to go out to the
counterparties with little or no negotiation. Just as I raised
the issue with others, I don't understand that at all, and most
Americans don't, that was billions of dollars. One company
one was 12 and a half billion dollars. And it's just hard to
accept the notion that we couldn't negotiate with the
counterparties. At that time,
we had no we had no leverage. If we didn't pay off, they would
say you're bankrupt blue.
Check for $180 billion today, AIG if we hadn't done that they
would have been in trouble
to AIG, but not to the doubt would have been troubled to.
Well, that's all true. But but the most of the most of the firt
most of the firms were foreign. We had no authority or leverage
over them. You're the chairman of the Federal Reserve. You guys
don't know I don't abuse my supervisory power.
Apparently not. And that case is entered by Korean authorities
arrested journalist Yuna Lee and Laura Lake consolidate your
credit card or other deaths.
are you consuming too much mainstream media? Are you even
consumed by them? When you expose to lamestream media, it's
like feeling you're fading into the background. The economic
crisis, the loss of your home job that your car can intensify
the feeling of hopelessness and pity. This can lead to total
loss of personal goals celebrity addiction and fatigue in the
morning. One option proven effective to treat lamestream
media is no agenda. For many it's only one dose in the
morning. Here's the report and safety information you shouldn't
be aware of. Call your doctor if you experience unusual visions
confusion or thoughts of aggression. No agenda can damage
your hearing abilities deteriorate your limbic system
and overturn your judgment affects. No agenda can cause
blurred vision and drowsiness. So use caution when driving
complex equals or handing guns. Case of sh in depression and
lost trust in global currencies the authorities and your
government can appeal. Be aware that in combination with any
kind of vaccination, no agenda can cause nausea, spontaneous
depletion of your bladder and loss muscular tension in your
sphincter lamestream media don't have to consume you. Ask your
doctor or Google for no agenda. If you're self medicating,
remember to take no agenda only in the morning. If you can't
afford paying for no agenda, ask how your credit card company or
your bank can help. No agenda because the lamestream media
don't have to consume you