Hey, would you like to make 10 bucks?
Adam curry, John C Dvorak.
Yesterday December 15 2016. This is your award winning give our
nation media assassination episode eight.
This is no agenda.
Robber getting the formula to all state sponsored media and
broadcasting live from the darkest corners of the universe
here in Austin Tejas in the morning, everybody. I'm Adam
curry,
and from Northern Silicon Valley where Plato is a man who
suggests vegan lettuce only diet, just tip of the iceberg of
John C. Dvorak,
Raglan buzzkill, the good Plato. Sorry,
it was into veganism, but
who knew Who knew what was popular back then? It's just
crazy. Hey, John, Episode 886 of our little show here, the best
podcast in the universe. Two things at the top of the show,
if I had a brilliant idea, oh, no, he was talking about getting
someone to edit a clean version of the show for some radio
station to want to edit. Yes, I have a better idea. Instead of
trying to find someone who does that. Why don't we just ask the
producers who are listening on the stream anyway, to write down
the time codes of questionable content words. And then at the
end of the show, send them to me, I'm doing everything anyway.
I mean, how many edits can be three, four. And I can do? Six,
seven. Well, that depends how the Tourette's is. But you know,
what I'm saying is in in general, is not a much easier
way to do it.
I'd rather have someone do it. Why? Well, I don't jive. I see
you having a, here's what's gonna happen. You're gonna get a
bunch of people with sending you all these time codes. Yeah. And
there's gonna be and they're not going to be right.
There'll be there'll be approximately right.
Okay, and then you go, though, okay, well, I don't think that's
a bad idea. Let's put it that way.
I just think it won't take me much extra time. It'll take me
maybe 15 minutes and I can spin it off and then it's done.
I think the way it should be done is that we did somebody out
there who's actually a pro who likes to listen to the show
would sit there with like an eight second delay but on
himself, he set it up and as you listen to the show needs to be
hitting the button every so often.
Okay. Somehow your your way? I mean, I think I can my My way is
cleaner. I think I developed this thing. You want my second
genius idea? Oh, yeah, I'm on a roll this morning. Okay, so Max
guys have just released his interview with me on RT. That's,
that's out now. Yeah, it's pretty good. And in it, we
talk about, you know, say so myself.
Well, you know, me, Mr. Humble. Now, I'm pleased, I'm pleased
with the result, not for not for my performance, but pleased for
the show for the promotion for the show the promotion of ideas,
the probe promotion of our producers. And we were talking
about neither was being verified on Twitter. And then I said,
Hey, you know, that's why licensing is coming. That's why
we have podcast licensed.com. And maximum. Oh, that's a really
good idea. And as I was thinking about and like, you know, we
could actually do a podcast verification service for real.
If we can have a little board of people, you know, who say who
qualifies as a, as a licensed podcast?
Well, that's funny, because I can't fit it with something else
I've been wanting to do. Okay. There was and you know, the old
theory about Top 10 Top 25 media influencers? Yes, yes. Like
that. Yeah, yeah, exactly. And we went over that list. You had
it somewhere. We should go over it again on the show. I
think it was, was it not Vanity Fair? Who did that? No,
no, I don't think so. I wrote it down. Whoever No, it was media.
I
told me the idea. Yeah, that was done. They did this
top 25 media influencers ended and we looked at the list. This
was after the show, I believe. And the list was just crap. It
was the worst. There were maybe there's three or four in there
that might be influenced, but they just the thing was
backwards. It was these media influencers.
Put it this way, if you don't have people like Rush Limbaugh
on the list than you it's not a serious list of media
influencers. You may not like Rush Limbaugh, but he's
definitely an influencer.
Yeah, especially when you have people on there like Martha
Ravitch. Yeah. And you have John Oliver.
So how do we combine that? I mean, I'm just looking to make
money. How do we how do we combine it?
Well, you're gonna look to get to make money. This is not a
moneymaker. But like most of the stuff we do, this is just a
service that will draw attention to the podcast, which eventually
there's no fee for becoming licensed.
Oh, no, that should be for the lifetime about my list of 25 not
about
but we couldn't we could we could basically launch the
podcast license. In conjunction with your fee.
Why not? Yeah.
I will work on it. And then I might as well start with the two
pieces I promised I would cut for you about propaganda and our
tea from Max Keiser when he and I were at the seed man. The seed
MAN Yeah. Could you didn't see the whole interview and I wanted
to play for you these two little clips with Max Keiser said some
outrageous stuff.
I'm all ears. Let's go. Alright, so
first we're going and again, this is we were on the Alex
Jones Show and Max starts telling us about the censorship
and actual propaganda in the UK. We're off calm and off calm is
the regulator of I think all media do they regulate other
things besides just broadcasting the wrong guy? Yeah, right.
Okay. But it's a kind of like a cross between our FCC and maybe
our FTC. And that well, here's what Max Keiser had to say about
how they handle Russia today and information in Gitmo nation East
all
news to some degree would have some degree of subjectivity to
it would have some degree of but these are the people saying kill
Donald Trump is not pure. It's not a pure comes. It's all
propaganda wholecloth. And pure news has in many, many times has
errors in it, you try to do the best that you can, but to say
it's fake news, it's the same. We don't want any news. We don't
want names, right? They're introducing the idea that we
want propaganda. We want only propaganda. It comes from one
source. And if you don't report what we say, it's like Britain,
where we do most of our shows has become a totalitarian
propaganda state where the state is now dictating everything that
comes out in any major news source. We're constantly
harassed as I was talking, saying, SF right off calm the
regulator, who gets actually on into our face and says, gives us
scripts. The UK regulator gives us scripts to read on our show.
And then they accuse us of propaganda. The regulator gives
us scripts that are detailing our position on energy companies
in the UK that state sponsored propaganda that's right up there
and Pol Pot
and all of the notices all day.
I like how he brings Pol Pot into it for some reason. What is
he thinking?
Like? He's, what I like is the fact that he does Alex wants to
always get his word and have some sort of just say crazy
stuff. And he just rides right over.
It's it's a Super Male Vitality drops. I think it just makes
them like by and Max just yeah, you're right. Just keep going
national
security. Oh, you can talk about where nuclear weapons are
stored. Next edge. You can't say you're for Brexit or you can't
say you're against it, you just have kind of no view you
can, can Brexit first I'm trying to get a word in edgewise.
Failing
six months give up when those two are battling.
Again, Brexit for six months, you
can't say anything negative about your migrant situation,
you
can't say illegal had mentioned Brexit for six months, they
threatened to take our tea off the air in the UK.
About that I knew that it was Isn't it like a two week window
that you have with voting in the UK? And no, I think so. And our
tea wouldn't have wouldn't allow or they wouldn't allow our tea
to talk about Brexit for six months.
And that was rigged. They were they were all in on keeping
making sure they got patched. That's why they're still not
going to follow up.
But how you know, how can anyone claim Russia was involved with
RT couldn't even report on it?
And that that's later said, Okay. And that's that's the kind
of restrictions we deal with. There's no free speech in the
UK. The UK is pretty high up on the global free speech. And
by the way, they want a law passed here the same as England
that quote, If something's foreign media while they invited
in, then you're an American on that international platform.
Everything's global, then you can't ever make comments about
anything domestic. Well, how are you supposed to do the news?
I'm sure you covered the ribeye but here's here's Adam bringing
in a little no agenda law appeal of the Smith Mundt. Act. Yes,
your show. And people need to hear that. I think that in the I
think was the mid 70s There was a bill an act a law that said
the US government may not propagandize its citizens never
appealed it three years ago in the National Defense
Authorization Act. And the reasoning behind it was well we
do so much propaganda on the internet that is going to
eventually flow into the US so so just so we don't get in
trouble you might as well just take it off the table and this
is only a couple
years ago they said we're gonna put out fake news they said even
deceptive stories
we do put out the Voice of America they do put out fake
news
so they're saying we're fake when they admit they're fake and
passed a law that they can lie to us
correct Voice of America is an American propaganda arm for
American propaganda it's it was out you couldn't broadcast Voice
of America in America due to anti anti propaganda laws. Then
they changed the law and now you can broadcast Voice of America
inside America because our pro propaganda there is no anti
propaganda laws anymore in America
as I'm not. So then more talk blah, blah, blah, more
interruption commercial break, and then Max Keiser blows the
lid off of something that we discussed on our show. Two,
three, actually, I have the date somewhere Let me see. tell you
when it was Um, because I have clips it was paper 2014 March
2014. Here we go about Voice of America. I'm sure you cover the
repeal of the Smith Mundt act on your show Hi. And people need to
fast forward
mistake, Voice of America in America due to anti prop anti
propaganda laws, then they changed the law and now you can
broadcast Voice of America inside America because our pro
propaganda there is no anti propaganda laws anymore in
America. As I mentioned to you a while ago, when I was doing my
show in Paris, I was approached from somebody from voice America
to do an on air hissy fit resignation on our tea. And I
was
at the same time when that other girl girl came out.
And I told him, You know, it's of course,
we know it's not really Voice of America, it's central
intelligence.
They were flashing big money around. You don't get it. I was
a stockbroker in the 80s. You can't bribe me. You're not when
that was that sack of money. You've got to come with a truck
full of money or go home, but
he is bribable. You know?
Make enough out maybe. So how about that?
Yeah, that's kind of depressing.
But it was it was because we knew that she had been coerced
by someone to do this. And well, we
were under the impression that it was CNN or one of these guys
who offered her a job and says, Hey, do even better. You
know, it was it was someone from there was, if I recall
correctly, and have to go back and look it up. It was someone
maybe involved with Politico or there was one guy who remember
he was tweeting before she so make sure your watch he was
retweeting her saying make sure your watch the wasn't Voice of
America, but this is blatantly that she was that she took the
money.
Yeah, that we tried to find out and probably No, I don't get the
brush they pay a lot at ours. Oh,
no, not at our tea. But I don't think it Voice of America
either. We tried to kind of get the amount out of Max. Oh, but
he is bribable you
know, big enough out maybe 318 wheelers. The budget of Voice of
America does not wouldn't wouldn't take me to the place I
would need to go to to undermine my own show you frickin losers
get out of my face.
We're such cheapskate.
I can't. I know they've only offered me 10 million to sell
out. I'm like, listen, John, what are we doing wrong?
10 million. What
are we doing wrong?
Yeah, they only offered us seven.
Here is the epic moment that Liz wall. Quit on air at RT This is
the moment we're talking about March 2014.
Last night, our teammate international headlines and one
of our anchors went on the record and said Russian
intervention in Crimea is wrong. And indeed, as a reporter on
this network, I faced many ethical and moral challenges,
especially me personally taking money from Voice of America
coming from a family, whose grandparents My grandparents
came here as refugees during the Hungarian Revolution,
ironically, to escape the Soviet forces. I have family on the
opposite side, on my mother's side that sees the daily grind
of poverty. And I'm very lucky to have grown up here in the
United States. I'm the daughter of a veteran. My partner is a
physician at a military base where he sees as redistributive
ramping up, she's about to blow it blow the lid off.
The first hand accounts of the ultimate prices that people pay
for this country here comes and that is why personally, I cannot
be a part of network funded by the Russian government that
whitewashes the actions of Putin. I'm proud to be an
American. Believe in disseminating the truth. And
that is why, after this newscast, I'm resigning who in?
Yeah, I had to I saw that poo poo. And we've been talking
about
getting fired because she can't even say Putin I that's
that's a stackable offense in my book. And then of course, she
went on her little tour and went to the view short clip,
right? Well, in light of current events, I could see how the
network was being used as a propaganda machine who promote
food and foreign policy. That's what kind of food yes right now
right now and everybody's saying two years, two years, but it's
like, you know, in an abusive relationship and the woman
finally leads you blame her for getting in the relationship in
the first place. If a journalist disagrees with the
administration, they just get hired to Fox News
but you know what, John, she's back. Liz wall is back on track.
You know that I actually want to base that before we go that far,
which is the RT network, which I have a bunch of clips from today
because there's some pretty good stuff on Aleppo because they are
the only ones that have a correspondent over there. Right.
But they're that they host the Thom Hartmann show. Yeah. And if
anybody's that I need Okay. Canada has anti Trump anti
Russia perspective. It's Thom Hartmann any. Your argument does
not hold water. That's the problem. And he
has Professor Cohen on Well, I heard Cohen on the other day on
a thumb show. Yeah, totally. Anyway, Liz wall reappeared on
CNN CNNs. And of course, she, she's the expert now on Russian
media infiltration. Selling chaos
is the effort of Russian propaganda actors to just sow
confusion to make people doubt that anything could be true.
Sure, yeah. I mean, that is the main goal of Russian
disinformation, whether it be through their television
channels, whether it be through other measures, like hacking
like legions of paid trolls. That is the ultimate goal is to
undermine democracy, to undermine faith in our
institutions like the like the media. And and we have a
president elect now who has basically matched some of these
key talking points in Russian propaganda to undermine our
system, and the
ones hard to cover cyber warfare or cyber espionage. That's
right. This is not like
covering traditional conflict, where you can see where the
missiles are being launched.
Right. And I think that's Russian media. Russian
disinformation has been happening for years now. But
people didn't really take it seriously. I mean, the goal of
Russian media is to undermine faith in our institutions, and
now they've succeeded in hacking our election. And I know that
Julia has done some reporting, and there has been some
reporting, but let's just
say that they've succeeded in hacking our elections. That is
fake news.
That uh, you know, what else is interesting about that comment?
Ed Woolsey was on one of the talks of that. And I got too
many clips already. So I didn't clip this. But Woolsey, the ex
CIA director, yeah. And he says the problem people are having is
they're conflating notes taken to discrepant things and pushing
them together to make it third thing that doesn't exist, right.
And she herself just did it by talking about it. Oh, the
Russians are really good at disinformation. They're really
good at disinformation. These emails are not disinformation by
any means. Now, there were recognized as legitimate emails.
So where's the disinformation part? In fact, there's been no
evidence of disinformation. No one can cite any disinformation
regarding this election. And as this little particular thing
goes on, I have a completely different take. Now, I haven't
heard all the deconstructions that have gone on or
spy by the way. I also have a theory on what really happened
here. Okay, well,
you want to do yours? No, no, I want to hear yours. Okay, you
might want to hear mine first. Yeah. First of all, let's take a
look at some of these clips that have come out about the hacking
and all I
have, I have a bunch of really silly ones. And one really
dynamite one from an unexpected source.
Well, let's start with NBC, which is a disinformation source
of anybody is, NBC would take the cake and NBC broken number
of you know, this is the thing where the all of a sudden, based
on the Washington Post once again, the Washington Post comes
out with a story saying that's been confirmed by the
intelligence agencies that the Russians who were behind it and
they can point the finger at Putin, which
is just not true. They have not confirmed anything. That's the
point and it's not it's not proven. Get it right
to Putin. So let's see what we have for the NBC rundown on this
now by the way play the play the Joby Joy Bay heart ISO before I
find this other clip oh god okay.
I mean, do we have to wait till the hammer and sickle is on the
American flag before we stand up to this guy?
And now you just walking on my beat I have that. Too late is
walking on my wall. I shouldn't have given you the floor plan.
Okay, let's start with start let's start with what's really
come out of this. I can't seem to find my hand BC guy
got a starter NBC Putin Russia hack. Oh, yeah, I'm ready to go.
I'm good to go boss.
NBC News exclusive what intelligence evidence the
Russian effort to disrupt the US election went all the way to the
top naming President Vladimir Putin, the former KGB chief as
an active player in the cyber operation that targeted
Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign. And tonight
we've also learned new details about what officials believe
motivated the plot. NBC senior investigative correspondent
Cynthia McFadden tells us more.
Tonight NBC News can report that Vladimir Putin was personally
involved Wow,
he's also on the Putin tip. What is this? This is why we have to
use our consonants John like T important Putin 1010 Putin up
Putin Putin.
Vladimir Putin was personally involved in the Russian attempt.
I gotta do that again. I can't believe that that's not good to
these people is Cynthia McFadden, their top top Hitman
broadcast legend, I shouldn't attempt to disrupt the US
election. To senior intelligence officials with direct access to
all the information. Tell NBC News. The new intelligence is
derived from diplomatic sources, and others, including spies,
working for America's allies spies, specifically, a high
level intelligence official tells NBC News, Putin's role was
directing the use of the hacked material. Putin's objectives
were multifaceted. What began as a vendetta against Hillary
Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American
politics, and to split off key American allies by creating the
image that other countries couldn't depend on the US to be
a credible global leader anymore.
against Hillary Clinton, that has been known for a long time
he wants to discredit American democracy and make us weaker in
terms of leading the liberal democratic order. And most
certainly, he likes President Elect Trump's views on Russia.
Now it sounds like we have evidence to support those
hypotheses.
So tonight, the question will the US retaliate against Mr.
Putin directly? As part of its contingency planning US
intelligence dug into Mr. Putin's personal empire and
concluded that his network controls some $85 billion worth
of assets?
That's true. All right. So thank you. Okay.
By the way, that just to break down that report from motive
from a deconstruction perspective, what was the point
of them throwing in the $85 billion assets? He controls $85
billion in assets? What does that got to do with anything?
I don't know that I don't know I do
is just put in there as it's just a gratuitous just slammed
and make you suspicious at the end. So your mind is open to the
bull crap that she delivered to your excellent point.
I think maybe as an additional background, or just what the
thinking is among the elites, Harry Reid. I had no idea. He is
more crackpot than I've ever even considered to be. Yes, yes,
every single Russia theory is in Harry Reid's mouth.
And I think that what's going on here is that you have WikiLeaks,
who coordinated everything they did, obviously, with the Trump
campaign. That's why they leaked that a little bit here to
appear. There. So it's, there's collusion there. Clearly, during
the campaign, especially last few months of the campaign.
WikiLeaks was heavily involved in trying to hurt Hillary
Clinton. And it helped Trump someone within the Trump
campaign organization was in on the deal. I have no doubt, call
me was a front for the Republican Party. Here's a man
who violated all precedent and decided that he was on his own.
He was going to overrule many, many decades of precedent. And
he said he didn't care what this attorney general this one or any
of the others said he was going to get involved in an election.
And he did. And he not only will he not only did it once, but he
did it time after time. He did one time a week or 10 days
before the election. He should not have done that. He should
not have done that. Because I'm confident. We lost Senate seats
because of that. And I'm confident that Clinton lost the
election because of that.
Let's say Hillary says to
Yeah, well, it's the talking points. It's a talk and it went
all the way to the White House. I mean, do you hear Josh
Earnest?
I didn't clip it. But yeah, I heard him play it. There's ample
evidence. That was long before the election, and even in most
cases long before October, about the Trump campaign in Russia,
everything from the Republican nominee himself, calling on
Russia to hack his opponent.
Joking. You know, he didn't even say that. I'm sure the American
media will reward you highly. If you can find the 33 missing
emails. That's what he said. Yeah, no, they, I mean, that is
such as being cynical about that. Yeah. It's such a
distortion of
the truth to hack his opponent hack. It might be an indication
that he was obviously
aware of it to hack his opponent. Oh, you mean Trump's
opponent? Okay, that makes it he was obviously aware.
And you know, he wasn't aware of anything now. So whatever. make
up our minds about Trump Is he the know all knowing everybody's
got to control of all things. He was aware of this and that or
he doesn't even do daily intelligence reports. How the
heck could he know he's dumb.
He's dumb. He's a buffoon.
He goes, Yeah, this
was the problem they've always always had with George Bush. The
media had he was either a big dummy he's dumb when he was a
man. Yes. genius, I know, you're gonna make up your mind exact
same thing
and concluded, based on whatever facts or sources he was. He had
available to him that Russia was involved. And their involvement
was having a negative impact on his opponents campaign. That's
why he was encouraging them to keep doing it. You got the
Republican nominee referred to when when was encouraging them
to keep doing it.
He's, he's referring back to the same joke that, hey, if you can
find those emails, I'm sure
they weren't doing it at the time. They hadn't found any any
of these emails from the DNC. So how could he be encouraging them
to keep doing it when they haven't been doing it?
This is exactly why Josh Earnest will never receive a podcast
license.
Now, the
Republican nominee referred to
I did that audacity trick again on him. He was there were pauses
of six seconds in this thing. I don't understand how he gets
away with when two people say why can't you speak in
sentences?
is very, very good. considered in the way? Yeah, right. So
but the audacity is great, removes all the silences.
Fantastic, who
the President of Russia as a strong leader, the Republican
nominee, chose that campaign chair that had extensive,
lucrative, personal financial ties to the Kremlin. And it was
obvious to those who were covering the race that the hack
and leak strategy that had been operationalized operation being
equally applied to the two parties into the Kitt, two
campaigns.
It wasn't fair, they should have released something from the
Republicans to that's not fair.
One side that was bearing the brunt of that strategy. Not
fair. And another side that was clearly benefiting from it. Oh,
no, I know, there's a lot of reporting, that there may be
some disagreement in the intelligence community about
whether or not that was the intent. there's disagreement.
That's a question that they should ask and questions they
may attempt to answer, but there certainly was no doubt about the
effect.
Okay, we've heard it
was it was 10 seconds. Okay, we're now
now since you weren't you do you're gonna play him? I had to
play my counter clip, which is not really a counter clip, but I
had to have the entire clip that available for people
on the show, Keith Olbermann. Yeah,
why wouldn't I only have the ICER the little Why would he
play the whole clip? It's seven and a half minutes is the reason
it's seven and a half minutes of dynamite juiciness?
No, no, no, the end is juicy enough. Okay. I'm glad you
thought that because now I can rage about as long clips, but
it's kind of juicy for a while then he just repeats himself,
but it gets at the end. It's so good. It'll get people to go to
the show notes and get used to that system and play it there. I
think unless you I got the whole thing. If you don't know
it's good, but I have it too. Don't worry about it. We'll play
the ISO. That's fine. But here we go. Keith Oldman, this is
he's now here.
Let's talk about let's see, let's go Oh,
no station. It's GQ.
He right. He can't keep a job because he I guess he's like
this this way. It's easy. It's easy. He's kind of a hothead.
And so he was fired from ESPN. And then he went to work for
MSNBC and pretty much carried the station during the Bush
administration wasn't the other way around. Because MSNBC then
he went to ESPN. No, no, he was at ESPN long before he didn't
know that he's very famous on ESPN. But then he made a big
fuss when they fired him because he was disagreeable. Then he
went to MSNBC and totally kicked ass for a while. And then he got
sick of them or so our current offered him a job he went to
current, then he bitched and moaned because he didn't like
the way this set was. And he didn't like the sound. And of
course, he was worse now. And then he went back to MSNBC to do
a special show, which never got any ratings. It was very good.
He's really a good sportscaster. And he fired again, and this
time, a little with less indignity, I believe. And so
then he's got nothing to do. I think he's got a lot of payouts,
he was getting good money. And so he now he does a podcast
video podcast for GQ magazine. He's done a few of these does he
have a podcast license? No fake news. And so he goes on this
rant, because he hates Trump, probably more than he hates
anybody more than George Bush or anyone else. So he goes on this
long rant on this clip that you can pick up anywhere and the end
of his where he really ramps it up and then he finishes off and
it's it's just, it's really, really weird. The Nation
and all of our freedoms hang by a thread and the military
apparatus of this country is about to be handed over to scum
who are beholden to scum. So
that was my favorite bit of the whole clip. We'll be holding the
military leaders are scum. I tell you, we beholden to scum,
scum for beholden to scum, Russian scum, Russian scum as
things are today, January 20, will not be an inaugural raishin
but rather the end of the United States as an independent
country, you will not be a peaceful change of power that
will be a usurpation and the usurper has no validity, no
credibility and no authority under the Constitution. This is
a reality that will become the only reality until this country
rents itself of Donald John Trump. He is not a president. He
is a puppet put in power by Vladimir Putin. And those who
ignore these elemental existential facts. Democrats or
Republicans are traitors to this country and will immediately and
forever after be held accountable. Resist peace
actually, damn it, hold on a second. Dammit, I wasn't ready
for that. Hold on. accountable. Resist and resist.
We must. We must resist and we will. About
if you actually put his ending together. Yeah, it's kind of the
same. No, no, no, no. Tell me what is his last two words
together as resist peace.
God resists peace. Yes, very good.
Moron. Let's listen again.
Resist peace. I can do that. Well,
let's, let's just use Joe gave me the floor. So I'm going to
keep it because I want to get right to the kind of the crux of
this whole thing. I wish
I wanted to play a few more clips before you get to the crux
of the thing.
Okay, if like, okay, and they're gonna be as good as Joy bay
horse.
Oh, man. I don't know if I can get as good as droid Bay hard,
but I'll try. Nancy Pelosi was on with Andrea Mitchell. And
yeah, and by the way, you have to see this video. The woman's
face does not move. Her eyes looked it looks like she puts on
a head mask every morning. Her eyes are really suck at Botox.
She's Botox is the man on camera? Oh, no. It's beyond
Botox beyond it's just just saying it's not it's she really
looks horrible. Yeah, she does. And and she came out with some
with a huge lie, which I have another clip to prove it.
Regarding, I guess it was it was Trump's reply to this to the
intelligence community with you know, they have some, some, some
they're not in total agreement, et cetera. And he said, why this
is the same people who told us there were weapons of mass
destruction, then we got to be careful with this before we
start taking action. That was pretty much his answer. And
Nancy Pelosi addresses this. I want
to ask you about Russia versus Yeah. Sorry.
But the idea that I was just gonna say this, this, this
commentary about the they've screwed up with weapons of mass
destruction was pretty much repeated by that analysis
repeated by everybody to an excess.
Yeah. Nancy Pelosi refutes it.
Oh, you have right. Yes, I saw this thing. And then when she
didn't clip it, I should have you got it? Yeah, you got me on
that one? Yeah, I was hilarious,
because this could be more controversial because of what
the CIA has said. And what the intelligence communities have
all agreed on is Russia's role in trying to interfere with the
US election with hacking, not just hacking the DNC hacking
John Podesta emails, and then according to our own reporting,
and a lot of other reporting, turning that material through
intermediaries over to WikiLeaks to be distributed? What what do
we know about what Russia tried to do and how effective they may
have been? I think it's quite remarkable. And people should
take short notice of the fact that the President of the United
States has made the statement he has about the Russian
involvement in the disruption of our election. Even if it didn't
succeed, even if Hillary Clinton had won, it's still very
important for us to have an investigation. I prefer an
outside bipartisan, nonpartisan bipartisan commission to review
it. Others have said it can be done in the Congress, but it has
to be done. can't just say, as Mitch McConnell and Speaker have
said Congress could do this. Yes, well, tasked them to do it.
It's interesting also, that Donald Trump responded when he
said when they said the intelligence community has said
that Russia's was responsible for the hacking. He returned it
with with the same people told us that Saddam Hussein Iraq had
weapons of mass destruction. Did not the intelligence community
never said that the evidence there is no intelligence to
support that claim. That threat was made by Have Changed Bush
Cheney administration, as you've seen in Britain, they've just
just spelled all of that it was it was a massive
misrepresentation of the American people. But there's
nothing in the intelligence to support the threat that bush
Cheney was present. So it was a cute response was a cute
response and other people felt maybe it's fallen for it. But
it's important to note that a president should pay attention.
All right. So she's saying cute, but it's just not true. There
was the our intelligence never said that it was Bush and
Cheney, the horrible Bush and Cheney. Well, that's
interesting. Why is it that former CIA director Michael
Hayden in 2008 said something different, looking back at what
the American people were told about weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq? Was there a colossal intelligence failure?
Yeah,
we got it wrong. All right. When and although I wasn't at the
CIA, I was in the room when that national intelligence estimate
was approved by the community. Oh, wasn't just the CIA
document. And frankly, Tim, I voted yes. It was my belief that
what we were saying in that document was correct.
Why did you get it wrong now? So Pelosi is full of crap.
She's just out blatantly lying, or she didn't know where she's
senile. Hello?
Yeah, it's just incredible. And yeah, it wasn't that hard
to find was it? It was he was on he also admitted that they
screwed up on
us Hayden talking about what happened. They all signed on to
the agreement, though, is that consensus document same words,
we're hearing now. Consensus, high confidence report. You
imagine if if you got your report card as a kid, and little
Johnny, we have a consensus and little Johnny with high
confidence, we think he's going to be okay. Come on. So I have
the other side of this argument. But maybe you just want
to jump let me read my side of it. And you have this go start
with Intel agencies. No Show scandal one, Fox,
you got it.
We have a big story breaking tonight as an increasingly tense
fight takes an ugly new turn with US spy agencies now
refusing to share the Intel being used to attack the
legitimacy of the 2016 election to some extent. Good evening,
and welcome to The Kelly File, everyone. I'm Megan Kelly. The
battle over the alleged Russian interference in the 2016
election took took a couple of explosive turns in the last 24
hours. First, the Republicans started questioning why they
were seeing media stories of Russian involvement that went
well beyond what they had been told by these agencies. Then the
house Intel Committee demanded an emergency hearing with the
CIA, the FBI, the National Security Agency to figure out
what's going on here. And now tonight, just hours ago,
Republicans forced to cancel that hearing when the Intel
agencies refused to cooperate, saying they would not be sending
any briefers in just a moment we will have reaction from
Congressman Peter, King of the Homeland Security Committee, I
saw that we begin tonight with our chief intelligence
correspondent Catherine herridge, who's had a busy day
in Washington, Catherine. Well, thank you Megan,
a pixie girl is back. She's had a busy day. Hey,
JC busy girl.
What you doing? Thanks so much. But
it's funny about her is I noticed this, especially in
reports like this. I think because she's been working at
Fox or there's something going on that they cut her off. She
has this look of a person that's been cut off. I don't know.
Like, she's depressed. She has a look of defeat.
They won't tell me they usually they always tell me stuff. But
now they're not telling me anything. Look, you got the
Peter King thing to? Yes. And there's something I want to tell
you. That's in the next clip. That was that was
my kicker clip on. Okay, you you go for it. Let's finish her.
Let's finish. Pixie girl
10. Katherine? Well, thank you Megan. Late today the Republican
chairman of the House Intelligence Committee issuing
this statement after the CIA said the agency would not send a
briefer to Capitol Hill to deconflict reports about
Russia's alleged interference in November's election. Congressman
Devin Nunez of California writes, The committee is deeply
concerned that intransigence in sharing intelligence with
Congress can enable the manipulation of intelligence for
political purposes. The committee will continue its
efforts and will insist that we receive all the necessary
cooperation from the relevant leaders of the intelligence
community. The classified briefing Thursday on the Hill
was going to focus on whether there was new intelligence or
analysis. That includes the Russian President Vladimir Putin
authorized the cyber activity to ensure a Trump victory. The CIA
told the House Committee it was too busy with the President's
review to help. A former intelligence officer tells Fox
News that knowing the Russian leaders intent would be
challenging.
If you're going after a leadership target, you have to
have someone next to that leader. So the idea of finding
out intent has to be clearly defined and based on having a
human into Eleganz asset spy inside of the very circle you're
trying to collect on,
with at least four investigations on Capitol Hill
and a full review requested by President Obama, a former senior
intelligence officer said the probes are creating a paper
trail will make it harder for Mr. Trump and the Russian
president to build a close relationship after January 20.
Megan,
now be hard. I think it'd be party. I was douchebags are
gone.
So they bring in Peter King, who is you know, we consider kind of
a flake
No, we consider him an incredible douchebag. But he was
making sense here.
We Well, which was interesting to me as he was so upset about
this situation, because you when the Congress calls for a hearing
on this emergency or otherwise, these agencies work for the
Congress, these these oversight they weren't for this is
oversight on behalf of the people, right. And so they have
to show up. So the reason not showing up is we have to
speculate on why are they showing up? I think they're not
showing up because they don't know what the hell's going on.
Or where this is even coming from, I think the Washington
Post, the New York Times and NBC, which are all colluded
against Trump in the first place. I think they're making
this stuff up. Well, I
have some ideas. So okay, good. Well,
let's do the very first image. The thing about the king thing
here where he's upset. He says a lot of stuff in here. I
agree. This was I told you, this is my kicker killer clip.
It's a killer clip, because he's talks about stuff that has been
in the news. And he's refuting it all even though they wouldn't
nobody would say anything before. This is a very if you
could listen to Peter King closely. You really get a lot
out of it. There we go. Let
me now with more New York Congressman Peter King, member
of the Homeland Security Committee, and Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence. Congressman, good to see you
tonight. So what does it tell you that these agencies have
refused Congress's demand that they show up and share the Intel
record? This is absolutely disgraceful. All we've heard
from the intelligence community over the last several months is
they they could not say that there was any attempt to
undermine Hillary Clinton to help Donald Trump. The consensus
was that there was an attempt by the Russians to put the cloud
over the over the election to create disunity. Well, that's
what's happening right now. And it's the intelligence community
that's doing it. There was nothing at all ever told to us.
In fact, they would they said that they couldn't prove it,
that there was an attempt to favor one candidate over the
other. Director Clapper, the Director of National
Intelligence said that publicly on November 17, they what
they says they said they couldn't prove it. But yet the
news media keeps telling us they could. I'm
going to interrupt this clip for 45 for 21 seconds. This is
clapper answering the question about WikiLeaks. As far as
the WikiLeaks connection, the evidence there is not strong,
and we don't have good insight into the sequencing of the
releases. Or when, when the data may have been provided. We don't
we don't have as good insight into that.
Otherwise known as nothing. We get nothing. Peter Green King
speaks the truth here speaks the truth.
Yes, nothing at all ever told to us? In fact, they would. They
said that they couldn't prove it, that there was an attempt to
favor one candidate over the other. Director Clapper, the
Director of National Intelligence said that publicly
on November 17. And now we have this as far as I know, there is
no decision by the CIA, there is no consensus opinion. And yet we
find it in the New York Times and The Washington Post. And yet
the House Committee on Intelligence was told nothing
about this. And yet it's our committee. It's Devin Nunez, who
has jurisdiction over the CIA and all the intelligence
agencies. This violates all protocols. And it's almost as if
people in the intelligence community are carrying out a
disinformation campaign against the president elect of the
United States. It's absolutely disgraceful. And if they're not
doing it, then it must be someone in the house or the
senate who's leaking false information. And it should be a
full investigation of this.
So you're telling me then when the white love
Megan hit, there's gambling going on? You're telling me that
someone's lie.
So you're telling me that when the Washington Post had this
report on Friday, citing anonymous sources, saying that
the CIA has determined Russia interfered in the election with
the purpose of helping Trump's campaign, that was the first you
heard of it from the Washington Post, and now this would be
your, your, your next and best attempt to get the CIA to come
before you and you have oversight responsibility over
them to tell you what they know. And you've been refused?
Absolutely, absolutely refuse. They won't be there tomorrow.
They have somebody else in time to leak it to the Washington
Post and The New York Times, but they don't have the time to come
to Congress. And it's the House Committee on Intelligence that
has the absolute jurisdiction over the CIA and the
intelligence you don't believe
that, that we're too busy to help you right now, because
we're busy helping President Obama Don't believe that
it's their job. It's their job to come. They don't have any
choice they have to come in.
Yeah, it was really good.
Well, he made a bunch of points clear, which is that these
agencies don't know what happened or who did what. I
think this whole thing is made up. I think the Washington Post
in the New York Times following it will at some point say
they're going to come out. Maybe after the inauguration, I think
the Oradour had nothing gyration but the Electoral College and
say, We were misled. We apologize. They're gonna be
apologetic, but they're gonna have said that we were misled by
normally good sources that are giving you this kind of bullcrap
that
they'll do the same thing they did with the with the
intelligence briefings to the president. Yeah, well, you know,
somewhere along the line and gotten mistranslated, and then
it didn't come out, right. People were afraid to speak up.
And
it's just it's nonsense, but these guys are going after the
election, and they're trying to do anything they can to to get
the Electoral College chair. Yes, yes. And yes, Fox actually
has the this little clip, which is a bit of an aside. This is a
clip about Larry Lessig now getting involved with the
electoral college vote trying to convince people that they're
going to switch over to Hillary, for some unknown reason. But
he's also offering legal service you get to just play this clip.
This is Electoral College Lessig.
allegations that Mr. Trump got a helping hand from the Russians.
Again allegations trace Gallagher picks up the story
from their trace.
And begging because Donald Trump won 306 Electoral College votes
to change the outcome anti Trump activists would need to convince
37 Republican electors to vote against him. Harvard
Constitutional Law Professor Larry Lessig himself a brief
Democratic presidential candidate says he knows of 20
GOP electors who are considering ditching Trump he's even
offering them free legal counsel, which could come in
handy considering 29 states including 14 that voted for
Trump have laws that bind electors to the candidate who
won. Professor Lessig has offered no evidence to back up
his claim, which is being directly contradicted by the
Republican National Committee and state GOP committees who say
that only one GOP elector Chris Sopron of Texas has revealed
Texas to vote against Trump, state and national GOP leaders
have also been in constant contact with Republican electors
to make sure they lock down their votes, although democratic
operatives are still actively trying to sway those people.
All right. Now how to start start with this? How is Lessig
offering free legal services? And by the way, he's not a trial
attorney.
He's a professor,
but how is that not a bribe? And how's that not interfering with
it with dooleys? Do actual election.
John, you misunderstand. These are patriots. They're patriots,
the heroes? That
guy? That guy's from Austin, Texas. I have no idea. I don't
think so. It should be moved to Texas, dude,
you'll be gun toting liberals. Before we get into the Electoral
College. I have a couple things I want to play. Regard to well,
so we heard Peter King, he's congressman. He's Republican.
CARROLL, CNN. Thanks for the conference. Carol. CNN had calm
Congressman Eliot Engel from New York. He's a Democrat, and he
corroborates the story. Let
me let me ask you about that. Because you're a ranking member
of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Did you hear from
intelligence sources, that Russia's intent was to put
Donald Trump in the White House?
I haven't heard from intelligence sources. I only
know what when I'm reading in the newspapers, we intelligence
sources have not contacted the members of Congress. I'm calling
on the intelligence sources to brief the members of Congress to
give us a thorough briefing as to what they know and why they
came to the conclusion they came with. And I'm also calling on
the house to hold hearings. I'm the ranking member of the
Foreign Affairs Committee. I think it's appropriate if we
hold hearings, or some other committees might want to hold
some hearings, you know, in the house. We've had all kinds of
hearings about Benghazi about Planned Parenthood about Hillary
Clinton's emails. I certainly think that the house or to do
hearings involving this very, very serious breach.
Okay, so he corroborates the fact that intelligence has not
come to Congress. Yeah. So now I want to play a couple of short
clips that lead into my hypothesis about what really
happened with this hacking. Okay. And
then, when you're done with that, I have my one last clip
with my hypothesis, which will vary from yours. Okay, good,
I hope. Who knows? It's always a danger when you let me go first,
just reading the headlines though. New York Times. CIA
judgment on Russia built on swell of evidence. I mean, this
is how it's portrayed. That's one of my favorites. There's no
evidence swell of evidence. The perfect weapon how Russian
CyberPower invaded the US another New York Times headline.
And of course, what is unfortunate is that, although
they do it pretty, I guess if it was the printed version of the
below the fold is where they put the information. This was really
a fishing expedition. And that's how they got his password. You
can't really speak of a hack, if that's what happened. And they
have to keep going back to the Crowdfire report, which said,
Oh, this is how it happened. It was you know, it was a rogue e
mails, a phishing attempt, and they got your password, and then
you know, your emails were downloaded seconds after that.
Yeah. So that's not necessarily a hack, you know, and that could
be anyone could do it. It's a leak. And well, let's, let's,
well, now you get now you get into where I want to go. But
first, a nice little entre mile from Josh Earnest void,
responding to some of the charges from the President's
Twitter feed. And, you know, what I've tried to do is just to
present objective facts. And, you know, I think the objective
fact that's relevant here is the intelligence community a month
before the election, came forward and presented a
unanimous view, a high confidence assessment that China
was engaged in malicious cyber activity to destabilize our
political systems. I'm sorry, Russia.
What an idiot.
You get to bed. Almost Clip of the Day. That's fantastic.
Catch.
I'll take a borderline.
It's like a borderline. All right. What an idiot. Yeah.
He had a stupid look on his face to go. That's what he used to.
Used to be China. Remember? It was China, China, China, the
president China, China. Yeah. North Korea, North Korea. North
Korea, they hacked Sony, North Korea, North Korea. That's what
they say.
But you know, the funny thing is, I gave up a clip in here.
The funny thing is they're getting this. They seem to think
that what I'm talking about is the elite seem to think that
Russia is a great foil for anything. Yeah, play this little
aside, which is the German news now. Germany is pre blaming
Russia for what's going to happen to their election.
hysteria in America of accusations that Russian hackers
influence the presidential vote is now spreading to Germany,
which is gearing up for its own general election next year.
Newspapers have been flooded by headlines warning of possible
Kremlin interference. Peter Oliver reports.
We've seen this in the US we've seen it in the United Kingdom,
it now seems that it's here as well. In Germany, Russia
represents the biggest threat to your daily lives. If you read
the newspapers anyway, Germany spy chief said that Russia could
influence next year's Federal elections. I've been lapped up
by the media here with article after article after article all
saying that the votes of the German people might not matter
of Kremlin backed hackers have a different opinion. If you look
at today's headlines in one of the country's major newspapers,
the Frankfurter allgemeinen, Russia's mentioned twice on the
front page. And the story just up here about Aleppo, saying
that Russia never wanted to have any kind of peaceful or
diplomatic solution to the conflict. And then Russia again
mentioned in relation to hacking in the United States and
potentially attempting to influence the outcome of the
election and also its closeness, allegedly to Donald Trump. It
would seem that so much mentions of Russia going on in the German
press. It seems there's nothing else left for them to write
about. Peter Oliver RT Berlin. And it turns out
we don't think you did good.
There was another story don't have a clip. You get the idea?
Well, it gets better. Story came out this morning in the Daily
Mail. Syria and Russia could be encouraging migrant sex attacks
to oust Angular Merkel. Russian and Syrian secret services may
be encouraging refugees in Germany to carry out
orchestrated sex attacks in a bid to oust Angular Merkel from
office. And this is from the European Council on Foreign
Relations. In that fantastic Yeah, that's that's how you do
it. You get the migrants to write Hey, would you like to
make 10 bucks? A bet. Yo, Ray, go ahead. I'll bet you before
Christmas. We hear that the Russians are handing out Viagra
to migrants to rape the German
women. Well, yeah, we forgot the Viagra plug.
Yeah, you gotta get the Viagra plug in. That's how rolls. Yeah.
All right now to to get to my surgeon about what's going on.
And in this case, I'm talking specifically about the DNC
emails. Cuz that's really, you know, that's really that was
very that was hacking the election in regard that we all
discovered the DNC He had screwed over Bernie Sanders and
they were very partisan towards Hillary Clinton and whatever
they were going to do is going to get Bernie Sanders out of the
race. That would that's the true embarrassment because that's
true. It's true. It's it was in the documents, which are not
refuted. Is John Bolton, the oh, I want to be Secretary of State
but no way, Jose. I think it was on Fox and Friends. Now he's
former ambassador to the United Nations. Wasn't he also in the
intelligence community?
No, he was a bureaucrat in Washington that Bush took a
liking to because he was just kind of idealogue and they put
him in the UN. And that's really where as he got his reputation,
and before that he was considered a douche bag.
Administrator.
I think he's still a douchebag. Administrator. Yeah, well, no,
I as far as I remember. I can look it up. And I will while
you're doing this, but I he has no connection to that no real
connection to the intelligence community. I
think he signed his own will not death Warren but he'll never
work in, in DC again. Because he used the word although
technically correct. He used the word that how once you use that
word, you're crackpot.
It's not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the
outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC computers
was not a false flag operation.
Oops, hey, listen, dude. If you're going to use false flag,
don't expect to get work. That's just not how I mean, I agree.
False flag is it's a real term, it really happens has happened
with our government, but still
see computers was not a false flag, a handy tip, I got
operation.
Because, you know, truth, if you speak truth, and you're jerk off
your nutball false flag, it's real term. But anyway, yeah, it
sounds like and it does happen. Yes, it certainly does. Here we
got a number what FBI Director James Comey said, dealing with
Hillary's homebrew server, he said, We found no direct
evidence of Foreign Intelligence Service penetration. But given
the nature of this, we didn't expect to so the question that
has to be asked is why did the Russians run their smart,
intelligent service against Hillary server, but they're dumb
Intelligence Service services against the electorate? I
believe that intelligence has been politicized in the Obama
administration to a very significant.
Okay, I agree as well. He makes a valid point, which is why do
they have this sophisticated way of hacking into stuff? And the
FBI said, well, probably, you know, Russia hacked in we would
know anyway, because they know that's what you do. You cover
your tracks until the log files. It's it's a it's an art form.
Yeah,
you do it as like a pro in art form.
Now you use the word leak earlier. Here's Judge
Napolitano, and we
have to get some basics down. There's hacking and there's
leaking. Leaking is when someone internally or remotely reveals
information improperly into a third party. That's what
happened. And this is Clinton. It happened with a drumbeat day
after day after day, there were 47 48,000 emails that were
leaked. Hacking is when someone remotely enters an information
system and alters it remotely, so that the operator of the
system doesn't know there was an alteration. That is what did not
happen here. No matter what the New York Times and The
Washington Post are pining this morning, they cannot point to
any evidence whatsoever, that the outcome of the election was
altered by foreign agents, there certainly was leaking, that
leaking could have been facilitated by people in the
NSA, by a rogue and Mrs. Clinton's campaign, or by a
foreign. That was a leak. That was not a hack. But the leaking
probably came from someone on the inside, or someone who had
access to the fiber optics through which the communications
ran. That means somebody in the NSA or somebody who once was in
the NSA, what how do we know this? We know it because for
better for worse, whatever you think of them, Edward Snowden
revealed all this and revealed the nature and extent of the NSA
tentacles in all of the fiber optic traffic in the United
States of America, not to get too much in the weeds. The
leaking could not have occurred without the NSA knowing about
it. And if anybody hacked into altered internal systems, the
NSA would know who the hacker was. And when they did it. Okay,
we haven't heard any of that. All right.
Then I concur. Here's what I think happened. And this is
again, only regarding the DNC emails, which were very
damaging. Obama, hate Hillary Clinton. He hates the Clintons
in general. We know this man. They don't they just they didn't
they never got along. as not a good vibe. He also waited quite
long before he endorsed Hillary Clinton. And I think what he saw
as the campaign started is holy crap, this woman's gonna ruin my
legacy. She's getting up, they're gonna change my health
care, you know, my Obamacare, we're going to change all these
things. She's already saying, Well, you know, it's no good. We
got to fix it. There's no good. And I think that he was more
interested in his legacy. When I say him, I mean, him and the
people around him. And it would be better to have a Republican
come in, forget who it is. I mean, it's a dream that has
Donald Trump, because everyone will be able to say, Nah, man,
it was so much better when Obama was there. We really, we could
have should have given him a third term. I my assertion is
these emails were leaked on purpose by the Obama
administration, and in particular, I will say it was
done by Valerie Jarrett.
Well, it's an interesting theory. I don't think so.
Personally, okay. My thinking is different. And my thinking is
based on one clip that came out all of a sudden kind of was he
was the news media paid no attention to it. too. There's
what happened, which is the hacking of the DCCC. The D,
Triple C. Yeah. Which is the committee that elects the
congress people. And there was it was played on this is a clip
called those got DCCC. In some words, the name. And I'll tell
you what, it leads me to believe. And this is this is the
sidebar DCCC notes. Okay.
Play, or do you want us more setup? Yes. But you
know, Eric, one of the stories that you had a separate piece
about this, but one of the things that got buried, and
that's what we were all focused on the DNC hack, and perhaps the
Podesta emails, were how some of this information actually made
it down into very key House races, the hack into the D,
Triple C, the Congressional Campaign Committee.
That's right. So at the same time, as the the hackers got
into the DNC, they share a building and actually have a
connection between the computer systems of the DNC and the
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. And so they
were able to take 10s of 1000s of pages of documents from the
D, Triple C, which oversees the House races by Democrats, they
took these documents, and then they distributed them to
bloggers and the reporters in individual states at key moments
like right before specific debates before primaries, to try
to damage the standing of the Democratic candidates. It was
all the documents that went out were related to, you know,
opposition research and other collections of documents from
the Democrats. They that those document dumps, you know, had
real consequences on some Democrats. So well, you know,
the Trumps folks suggest that this had no impact on the
election. I mean, I think you could look at some of the House
races. In particular in Florida, there's a particular house race
where the party wanted one woman who was running an ad today to
to be their candidate. And she lost after the document dump
embarrassed her and it became a subject of debates and news
coverage. And that's that that was that was consequential and
what didn't get much attention from the media because we were
so focused on other things.
Demetri we just have a few seconds, are there enough
measures in
place from prime so talk to
me? Okay, so the only people that benefited from all this,
especially the D Triple C crack, where the Republicans, I would
put forward the idea that the Republicans were behind all of
this with various spies and tricky dicks and Nixonian style
of getting into the different systems and then leaking this
stuff to WikiLeaks doing it kind of using the Russian thing as a
smokescreen. And what makes me think that this is because the
Russians don't benefit from half of these congress people getting
an offer. There's the only people that benefit from all
these break ins hacks, fishing expeditions, no matter how
cheesy they are, including the Podesta one or the Republicans
and if it was done by the NSA or by anybody from the Obama
administration could really get they can get into Hillary's
personal emails, there was a lot of stuff they couldn't get into.
So this is a second tear kind of hack job. And the Republicans
did it. They did it and then they miss directed it to the to
the rubbish it was a Russian thing came up, they were fine
with. And Donald Trump says kind of mild things like well, you
know, they were wrong about the weapons of mass destruction. And
the giveaway to me is that late in the game, is when all of a
sudden this bullcrap comes out that well, you know, the
Russians also had hacked the RNC but they didn't bring that they
never hacked anybody. They let alone the RNC but this was
another little misdirection you throw it out there. Nothing to
see here. Oh, yeah, yeah, right. The RNC was also hacked. So
let's let's put more focus on the Russians outside sources.
Meanwhile, you get away with murder. The Republican Party's
behind this period
Okay, well, we couldn't be
the only who else benefited follow the money. It's a who
benefited? And this DCCC thing.
Yeah, that's
me, oh, wait a minute. There's no way the washers don't give a
crap about a Florida congressperson in fact that most
of these democrats and republicans all hate the
Russians. So why would they get involved in that? It makes no
sense.
Well, we do know that it's being used to possibly influence the
Electoral College. I want to talk about that after I say in
the morning to you, John C. For D Triple C.
Dvorak blender Morning, Mr. Adam curry also in the morning all
ships as he boots on the ground feet in the air subs in the
water. And all the names and nights out there.
Yeah. Oh, in the morning to everybody in the chat room. No
agenda stream.com in the morning to Sir slough, bought us the
artwork for episode 885 force majeure. This was his kind of
intelligence mapping piece of art, which is very nice. And I
and we thank him for that. And I want to read a quick note here
from Sir Trevor. Trevor. Quick note to say The torch has been
passed on to the next generation. The fake book album
art that JCD use in the newsletter was the work of my 14
year old son homeschool. Second Son Edgar, he goes by the sudo
edit box and was chuffed to be selected. Chuffed chuffed? I say
and then I'm just
like yeah, but just for this job.
No dinar generator.com is where you can find those whatnot where
you could find it well, you can you can find all the RP you can
also upload it if you're thinking of giving it a shot and
we appreciate the work again, thank you.
We do have you be able to thank for show 88866886 and had to see
in my brain. So we got two shows to go before we get to 888 super
lucky number for the Chinese we have no Chinese listeners. And
so nobody gives a crap. But that's beside the point we do.
Truman child comes in at the high number 1000 Instant night.
Nice, Lindon, Utah honorary Bigley producer donation for
Donald for Donald Trump. Did we win the night Trump I don't
think so. We'll get tonight whoa,
whoa wait a minute and we have to do we can at least do here it
is. Then we have a Trump jingle we got the spread the special
Trump jingle There we go. He's Trump. He's Trump. The President
didn't
go it's one of our best I love that is a really good jingle is
good. David boo her in Aurora Illinois 633 3.3 for ease is a
great pleasure. I feel my pleasure become a night this
year I've included the extra penny because someone once told
me watch the pennies and the dollars will take care of
themselves as right yeah, please except I think there's another
saying that that contradicts that one or pound foolish Penny
some bought Pound Foolish Pennywise Pound Foolish now
pound Pennywise Pound Foolish yeah well Yeah something like
that. Please again a pound of coffee for
me it's claimed in ear to throat and revered
please extend my thanks to both of you for a great year have no
agenda please dump me sir. dB of the 20 meter band.
Oh a ham nice a.
I'd like a ham pocalypse and some karma I wish everyone much
success in the coming year and he's got it he did the right
thing he's got 333 Dots three four didn't want you to throw
the penny in at all.
Yeah. Hey, but he didn't give us his callsign I noticed that oh,
that's no good.
Well, you can look him up in the database. Everyone who's a ham
if you don't know this people, there's a database that the FCC
keeps tabs on you can look them up as running and find out not
only their license where they're located usually their home
address although smart money like myself just puts the box to
be three elbow staple box number I use for everything. But yeah,
but boo boo would be in there. For sure, Donald.
Well hold on hold on. He wants the hemp farm okay for our
fellow hands. Oh, here we have ham radio guys. Ham
radio is the public service network of last resort when the
apocalypse comes where the guys who are going to save the world
right?
Yeah, there's that Okay. That's good. Now, it really Dawn Oh
Malik that O'Malley sir doom. The liberator of the hanapin
slaves, comes with $208.88 It's kind of hard. The thing is in
St. Paul, Minnesota nuts. He writes, wow, wow. Oh man, you
know if I put my keyboard in one spot,
let's use your keyboard again.
I got it back. It was behind me for some reason. Anyway, Don
says I need to get a shout out from my youngest Delilah, aka
lawyers, who celebrated her eighth birthday on December 14
through she's on the list, I think. Yes, both of my girls
love hearing their names on the show was the girl's name you
should mention I really, and are definitely singing along with
the jingles which always puts a smile on my face.
That's how it works.
Well, let's play the Trump jingles for the girls can learn
that one. See if they can play.
You just imagine if all of a sudden you have some people over
visiting. It's like, girl sings this. Hi. Hi, I'm law. I'm
Delilah. You can call me Lollards it's Trump.
He's Trump. He's Trump. The President didn't
tell you you weaponizing your kid with that.
I will also be requesting a fuck cancer. Yeah. Make a note. My
father in law passed away on Thanksgiving morning without a
relatively with a short battle with lung cancer. My wife
recently celebrated two years without her colon cancer
or without her colon or cancer. Oh, it's a happy
I also have a couple of other people in my life who were
recently diagnosed with stage four colon cancer but cancer he
says to all those listening Get your butt checked his route
treatable but deadly if not caught early, and I think might
be something What's up with Minnesota who are St. Paul?
Yeah.
That's horrible, man. That's horrible.
Yeah, especially when it's a clump. Okay, clusters.
Everybody has wrote the time code down good karma and we
thank you profusely
for your support of the show. And finally Dennis Cruz. appears
to be Parts Unknown on this spreadsheet is $200 and he
writes in oops. He doesn't write in that. He writes in the
following breeds Can you read it first?
After clearing through a two year process of a divorce that
should have happened and been finalized 12 years ago and
having it cost me $75,000 in fees, support and other
expenses? I'm finally able to present a decent donation. This
is returned money from what is left of a $400,000 sale of the
house. Not really but awful close.
All I ask is you mentioned hot coffee.org all one word and upon
cat the podcast den man show da di N ma N show on hot coffee.org
pronounced dead man dang man. I still host the no agenda archive
of shows on hot coffee.org as well as a host of information on
cannabis and cannabis law is the guy who wrote me about the the
CBD and THC CBD and THC working together. This will probably
only be an associate exhume executive but hey it's smaller
amount of gay when you guys asked for funding support way
back when and I wanted to be an Associate Executive Producer
hope this finds you well and warm. The show discussing THC
CBD and hemp cannabis comparison. Okay, there was show
320 to get a little excessive with the clips and 18 minute run
in many different clips. I think it was good information. Thanks
for the karma. You guys really helped me when things got too
crazy.
You know, I just along those lines I was going to talk about
later but since it comes up here in the Federal Register, there
was a note from the Drug Enforcement Agency under the
heading establishment of a new drug code for marijuana extract.
And here is the basics of it. Drug Enforcement Administration
creating a new controlled substances code number for
marijuana extract under international drug control
treaties administered by the United Nations. Some differences
exist between the regulatory controls pertaining to marijuana
extract versus those for marijuana and
tetrahydrocannabinol. It's kind of kind of an OLS they say the
DEA never knows can never know. The DEA has previously
established separate code numbers for marijuana and for
THC, but not for marijuana extract that CBD to better track
these materials and comply with treaty provisions. DEA is
creating a separate code number for marijuana extract with the
following definition quote meaning an extract containing
one or manure one or more cannabinoids that has been
derived from any plant of the genus cannabis, other than the
separated resin obtained from the plant extracts of marijuana
will continue to be treated as schedule one controlled
substances. So CBD will be a schedule one drug. Yeah, and
it's not the stuff that gets You're high. No, that's an
outrage.
It's an outrage.
It's medicine.
These guys get a clue. And then I want, you know, and this also
the people that just keep spewing the old bull crap about
oh, to gateway drug, which is total nonsense. Anyway, he says,
Thanks, Tom, I think he asked for a karma.
And here comes a karma for the day, man, for sure. You've got
karma on everybody. Thank you. Thank you, our executive
producers and Associate Executive producers who I had
been promoting all over the place. Our model how it works,
and that you are not listeners, you are producers. So make sure
you go out there and shine bright when people ask you about
it. Yes, I'm an executive producer of the no agenda show.
And yeah, that didn't sound very
nice. Then you give them a dirty look. Looking at where do you
look? What are you looking at man?
All right. Thank you all very much. We'll be thanking
everybody else in our second segment $50 or above. And of
course, we have another show coming up on Sunday. Remember us
at vora.org/and? A Yeah. So you tell them you're an executive
producer, give him a good dirty look and propagate the formula.
Our formula is this. We go out. We hit people in the mouth.
Patrick, shut up. So perhaps to get us into the mood for talking
about the latest gambits to thwart Donald Trump from ever
becoming president. We should play this little video, which
came across the transom. And this is from unite for America.
Is it about scum?
No, unite for America. Now unite for America is a this is really
this is dynamite. Actually, I have we should probably take a
look at the website, John. It's unite for america.org. And just
at the top here, we're all the Partisan Movement of concerned
citizens and volunteers united against the unprecedented threat
of an unqualified candidate taking our nation's highest
office. So here's a bunch of celebrate, he's led off by
sheen, Martin Sheen, Moby's in here, now a bunch of people
you'll recognize some of the voices. And here's their message
Republican
members of the Electoral College this message is for you. As you
know, our founding fathers built the Electoral College to
safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue
and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone
who is to an eminent degree endowed with the requisite
qualifications,
an eminent degree, someone who is highly qualified for the job.
The Electoral College was created specifically
to prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president.
There are 538 members of the Electoral College,
you
and just 36 Other conscientious Republican electors can make a
difference by voting your conscience on December 19, and
thereby shaping the future of our nation. I'm not asking you
to vote for Hillary Clinton. You're asking you to vote for
Hillary. Hillary Clinton. As you know, the Constitution gives
electors the right to vote for any eligible person,
any eligible person, no matter which party they belong to.
But it should certainly be someone you consider especially
competent,
especially competent to serve as president of the United States
of America.
By voting your conscience. You and other brave Republican
electors can give the House of Representatives the option to
select a qualified candidate for the presidency.
I stand with you. I stand with you, I stand with you. I stand
with you in support and solidarity with conservatives,
independents and liberals and all citizens of the United
States.
The American people trust that your voice speaks for us all.
And that you, you will make yourself heard through the
constitutional responsibility granted to you by Alexander
Hamilton. Whoa, yeah, it was evident, lacking more than the
qualifications to
be president. He lacks the necessary stability. And clearly
the respect for the constitution of our note the
piano swelling of position
and the opportunity to go down in the books as an American hero
who changed the course
a hero patron you have my respect. You have my respect.
You have my respect
for your patriotism and service to the American people. Unite
for America.
I respect your work, man.
You know, somebody came up with a thesis that these actors in
jerk offs from Hollywood have Rue actually cost Hillary the
election.
She had that's not a bad thesis at all. Now, because there's so
arrogant what is very interesting about this society?
I don't know if you went to unite for American I'm
why I was watching the difference talking heads pop up.
Did you know if you go to the FAQ page down about three
quarters of the way down, they do have a nice infographic that
here's the plan the plan is to get 37 Republican elector,
elector electricity about page that's about
that's FAQ now, it's all the way at the bottom. Yeah, it says
that about and then it goes to the FAQ.
Okay, all right, FAQ, and then three quarters away, down. So
the idea is, is to have electors flip for someone else, which
would not be Hillary, it would be someone else. There's talk of
John Kasich on this website. That's, I guess one of their
ideas. There's talk of Michael Bloomberg, for somebody else,
and then this infographic shows that it goes back to the house.
And then it would be the top three candidates, which would be
Trump, Clinton, and then the unknown, presumably John Kasich.
And they talk about the draft vote and all these things. And
what gets me is this is all based on the on Alexander
Hamilton's. The Federalist Papers number 68. And, you know,
on the one hand, I know it's the same thing you were talking
about earlier, how can you say, well, this electoral college is
is an arcane idea from the 1700s is crazy. But at the same time,
you want to stop the president electron becoming president by
using this same even more arcane, the federalist papers or
Federalist Paper, federalist papers. I think they're older
than the Constitution. Are they not?
I don't remember when they were written, but there's a bunch of
them. Yeah.
And, again, I go back to saying, yes, the Electoral College at
work, we kept a maniacal person, completely corrupt. And as far
as I'm concerned, unqualified from becoming president, it
worked. Because the big states couldn't basically call I mean,
if Texas, Texas by itself could do this. We have 38 electors
here. I think. 39
Yeah, Texas is just alone. We're doing they already have one
turncoat. Yeah. So that is the shouldn't be sued. By the way.
That is the idea. And everyone's going giddy over admit giddy,
giddy. I tell
you, Well, this is like, I'd hate to bring this back up. But
this reminds me of the bet with my two journalist friends. Which
I finally got my second checks. They made up okay, night and
hookers and blow baby, which both of them said it sitting
there at the dinner table said, well, Trump is going to quit the
campaign. Remember this period of time? Everybody was to all
these big news organizations were trying to tell us that
Trump was going to quit the campaign because things are
going so poorly for him. He's going to quit by Friday. I think
we're there on Tuesday. And they both took the best. This is
bullcrap. This is nonsense. There's no way. Why would he do
that? It makes no sense. No. and No, they took the bet. Oh, yeah.
No, he's quitting the campaign, obviously. Oh, absolutely. Yeah,
he's, this is the kind of delusion and these New York
Times guys. That level was
no way it was a New York Times Wall Street Journal level. Okay.
There you go. And, and by the way, so there was a thing in the
Wall Street Journal. I don't know. Unless you want to finish
the you want to finish some points here. But I want to talk
about something that was run in the Wall Street Journal. That
was a map of the table with everybody at the table. And I
want to discuss it was in the journal and showed who was at
that meeting with the techies. The big tech guys. Well, let's
get to that in a second. Yeah, maybe you can do it. It's tech
news, Jim. God, okay.
But let's just finish up the the Electoral College, because I
find this highly interesting and entertaining what they're trying
to do.
It's desperation of the worst kind. It
is. Here's Chuck nowait. So again, Federalist Papers are not
part of the Constitution. I mean, do we need a background on
the Federalist Papers? I think we do. Actually. Can you give us
a list of those go to the wicked. Now let's go to the
Wikipedia page and read about it.
No, I haven't. By the way, Tina and I were looking at my book of
knowledge entry yesterday.
Oh, yeah. Does it need fixing? Well, you have a big audience
now that can fix it.
She fixed it. But here's what's funny. They talk about my
company that took public think new ideas. And at one point we
had, we had 700 employees. It was a very big company on
Wikipedia. Now it's 7400 employees. That's how many
employees I had. Just to give you an idea of Wikipedia. We
were how many Were there really 700 And how many they say 7400?
So what do you bitching about?
Wish you many employees? Wish you
many employees? Yeah, federalist papers later known as the
Federalist was the name of the publication later known as the
Federalist Papers and Ken Lexion have 85 articles and essays
written under this pseudo Nam. Nobody had the guts to write it
no Pub Pub bilious are published.
So Hamilton didn't even write it under his own name. Now, it
could be fake news.
And it was it was, it was fake, fake fake names. It was actually
written by Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay promoting
the ratification of the Constitution. So these are
during the constitutional development 77 were published
serially in the Independent Journal in the New York Packet
between 7087 and 7088. The authors of the Federalist Paper
forms wish to influence the vote in favor of ratifying the
constitution. So they didn't want their names on there. So
they do it doing this is this is a form of fake news, I think.
It was all under I didn't know was under pen names.
Yep. But a pen name one guy with different guys writing for him.
Federalist number 10, in which Madison discusses the means of
preventing rule by the majority. We
don't know if Madison wrote it, or Hamilton wrote it.
Or John Jay was an important character.
Interesting point,
advocates a long commercial report. I'm sure they talked
about it later. So when I wrote that part, the way they talked
back then, anyway, and it was a lot apparently Hamilton Moser
wrote most of it. In fact, Federalist 84, is attributed to
Hamilton, Federalist 10, Hamilton, federal, Federalist
39. Is Madison, just mostly about about the about creating a
Republican a federation as opposed to a pure democracy,
which they argued against right, because of the problems with
democracies.
So what they're saying that people who want to the electoral
votes changed, are saying the intent was that really the
Electoral College, we're the ones that pick the president, we
can even pick someone who wasn't and never even nominated, we can
pick someone who doesn't want to be president, that's the John
Kasich thing. And we need to do that with full understanding of
the candidate. And therefore we need to have a this is a good
idea that we need to have eyes on the classified evidence of
Russia hacking the DNC and Podesta emails and whatever else
Russia did in and giving Viagra to German migrants. That that's,
that's that's the idea. And people are giddy over this.
People who hate the Constitution and add a second amendment.
This is true data document in the UN.
Yeah, it's an old outdated document when they had muskets
this it doesn't it doesn't. The First Amendment. No, it's
outdated. It's a living document and amendments soup has to be
updated to reflect social media. But no. Now when it said the Oh
my I'm losing my voice. Now they're
going back to the 1700s. Yes, yes, it's going
forward. Of course, the view obviously
happened is going forward the idea that we'd apply it to this
election when it was decided before
tution provides and now for
a home visit glimmer of hope. On the on the Constitution.
glimmer of hope on the Constitution is a glimmer of
hope we have an out.
I would say that dad play Hamlet is probably ruined it for all
these liberals? Oh, yes. Yes.
And here is
Barbara Walters came out with some interviews. I saw
she said the viewer was ruining the legacy who is bad. It's
because of that. She thought the network is ruined it there's a
revolving door. They don't have the same people. weeks in a row.
Now. She went on and on about it, she says has nothing to do
with it anymore. Well,
we do not want it to change because it's just lovely the way
it is. It's material. It is show prep. Here's the CHIP. CHIP
Todd, Chuck. Chuck, Chuck Todd, Chuck Todd. Chuck Todd. Yeah. He
know. He's all in on the idea of getting rid of the Electoral
College which of course will take a constitutional amendment
which is fine. We can do that if you want to. But there's a
little different take on it. If we're never going to use the
Electoral College and we should abolish it. Not to say you go
popular delegating
aren't they using the electoral college now? Because the popular
vote thanks to California by the way, I keep harping on this
because nobody else is. aren't we using it now? Isn't that what
has been been used for to keep California from running the
place? Yeah,
but they want to use it differently, John?
No, no, not he says, We've are not going to use it. He says, if
we're not going to use it, aren't we using it?
Yeah. But he would this is a converse conversation about
getting rid of it, saying, Well, if we're gonna get rid of it,
we're not going to use it.
No, he says, We're not going to use it when we get rid of it.
That's what he said is the other way around. And then we're using
it. This doesn't make any sense to me, but I'm sorry, I'm sorry,
I interrupted the clip, but play it away. But I'm just saying
these guys are insane. In
general, pretty much every clip we play on the show will have
insane people in it.
Because that's what the mainstream is, if we're never
going to use the Electoral College, and we should abolish
it, not to say you go popular vote. Delegating. The point is
the the Electoral College was the idea of a college of
influencers, right? Deciding whether the American public has
made the right decision, if you are not going to ever allow them
to exercise that power. I'm not saying get rid of the Electoral
College and the idea that a state is worth a certain amount
of jealous that is one and turn it into a delegate.
That needs to be changed. This whole election cycle has shown
us what the Founding Fathers have created needs to maybe
change. They didn't foresee social media,
I give them credit, you gotta give them credit, they thought
of almost everything. Emoluments Clause,
but, but they didn't see social media and the immediacy and how
things can change at a moment's notice electoral
college is there to prevent the biggest majority states from
dominating the Presidential process. So it's working exactly
as the fact
that that guy got shut up real quick when he said that. Now
he's
the only guy with any logic. I mean, that's exactly what he
said is exactly the situation that we're dealing with. Now.
There is they just don't know what I've got. Oh, hold on. I'm
coming to light and view holding on. Is there anything that we
can please little music, little Theremin maybe
Theramin? If you want Theramin no problem. Okay. Ladies and
gentlemen, hold on one second. John. We have an enlightened
view.
I just thought, hold on, hold on.
I just come to some conclusion that I think is worth with
stopping the show almost for they hate Trump.
Wow. Yeah, they do. Yeah. With the passion. President elect
Trump does have an actual problem with his hotel in
Pennsylvania, I have uncovered Pennsylvania one of I don't
know, why is it Pennsylvania? I'm in Washington, DC. I'm sorry
at all, is
it? I think it's on Pennsylvania Avenue. That's what it is, as
the old postal, that's the old post office.
So he's leasing that. And in the lease, there is a provision that
is going to be problematic from him. And this is according to
the GSA, which is the the government
Government Services Administration.
Thank you. Here it is in the contract. Let me see. So he won
the right to develop that in the lease, okay. The terms of the
lease preclude any elected federal or DC official from
holding the lease, including the provision that quote, no member
or Delegate to Congress, or elected official of the
government of the United States, or the government of the
District, Columbia shall be admitted to share to any share
or part of this lease, or to any benefit that may arise there
from provided however, that this provision shall not be construed
as extending to any person who may be a shareholder or other
beneficial owner of any publicly held corporation or other
entity, if this lease is for the general benefit of such
corporation or other entity. So that means he, unless he puts it
into a shell company that is public. He's gonna have a
problem,
and they're gonna go out and he's gonna have to dump it.
Yeah, I mean, he's owned other hotels that he sold off. I mean,
he owned the Plaza Hotel for a long
time just saying this is not reported. You will hear about
it. You've heard it on the No.
It's not report because there still is on the list. They're
still harping on this rush. They got all this other news to keep
harping and harping on it. And when that runs out of steam,
which will be in a week or two, then they'll bring this up more
troubles for Donald Trump ahead. Breaking news, more troubles for
Donald Trump ahead. Yes. And then they're going to talk about
this. There'll be some rough road for the president elect we
do have we're ahead of the game on our show, as everyone knows,
and so this year, what you're doing is just breathing, kind of
a news story from a man and I'm guessing two three weeks
probably after the after the gotta hound the electoral
college thing because that's their last best hope. That's a
good point. They're not gonna start talking about anything
until that's all once he gets in which will happen on the 20th I
guess Yep. Door not to try this month sometime shortly. I think
it's when when is the 19th
I forgot what the 19th is the electoral college vote. Okay,
that's it.
That's the one j 20. Is the is the riots. Yes. That's the
January inauguration. Yes, sir. So okay, so the 19th which are
coming up on? Yep. What's the traditional base? 15? Is what
the 15
for Wednesday?
Wednesday? Wednesday, I'm
sorry, not Wednesday. Monday is a Monday. Yeah, Monday will be
okay. That means on show eight, we will be discussing this
situation because you never know. I mean, it's possible that
what Larry Lessig says is true that the Republicans all hate
Trump too. And they're gonna vote for someone else.
John Kasich the federal case, it seems to be the the guy. That's
that's the seller.
Basic is a douchebag.
Yeah, yeah, I would say you're right about that. Yeah, we shall
see.
All right, where were we? Sorry, I interrupted with we're all
over the place. My meta analysis? Yes.
Well, let me see. And, oh, I want to go to Euro land for a
moment.
Well, if you're gonna do that, then afterwards we get to wait
before I can do it. Since we're still talking about Trump. Yeah,
let's do the miscellaneous rants, which incorporates the
Bay Harbor ISO,
ah, miscellaneous rant.
I mean, do we have to wait till the hammer and sickle is on the
American flag before we stand up to this guy?
I think what we have are ignoramuses billionaires, and a
few generals, this is pretty frightful stuff. You have loads
of people who have never been in government who don't understand
the difference between business and government.
And we have a president elect now who has basically matched
some of these key talking points in Russian propaganda to
undermine our system.
We're talking about a candidate who's lost in a historic way in
terms of the popular vote but clearly won in the Electoral
College. Is this something of a national emergency? He's Trump.
He's Trump. The president.
I can't get enough. I don't care what the guy sings a jingle is
just great.
Yeah, it's a good one. Good. Well, as long as that from that
is from the cameras. I know that the crazy parody guy, Jeff
Smith, the general No, no, no, the commercial guide
Yankelovich. Oh, weird now. Yeah, he did a whole song based
on that riff. That's from some song from I think it's, I don't
know Pearl Jam or some
Gump. Gump lump lump. lump? Lump, right? lump? lump? Right.
President of the USA. That's what it is. All right. Nigel
Farage, we always love hearing from Nigel when he's speaking to
the douchebags at the European Parliament. Now,
before we play this clip, I saw part of this I didn't see the
whole thing you probably have it. Yeah. But I thought he
bailed on that. I thought he quit the European Parliament.
I think it's the next term that he's not in, I believe,
because I was when I saw this because it referred to the
election. I'm watching it going, I thought he quit. What is he
doing there? Someone
would know someone in the chat room probably knows exactly
what's going on with that. But um, he's there as part of the
way he's still in you, Kip, isn't he? He quit. He had to
take it over.
Because the person who took it over some woman I think that she
couldn't handle it. And I think they just pulled him back in is
what happened. Well, I don't know. We should look into it.
Yeah, I saw this. I said great. Is you guys back?
And he was talking Yes, indeed. More show prep. was very, very
good little speech here about NATO. The European army which
again, we were promised, promised I was there I was
living in the EU. Never will we have an army. Well, those days
are over. This is pieces unicorns, rainbows. No, no, no,
no, do what
I think we can all agree that 2016 has been a momentous,
indeed, historic year. And as it's Christmas, let's think of
those events in terms of the Three Wise Men baring their
gifts. First, we had the Brexit deliverance, then we had the
Trump triumph. And then thirdly, of course, the Italian
rebellion. It's just that in this case, the gifts were all
the same democracy and the rebirth of the nation state. And
I really think you better listen because I know in the past,
you've managed to ignore Danish, Dutch, Irish and French
referendums. But this time, it is for real, a democratic
revolution has begun. And yet, when the 28 leaders of the EU
countries meet tomorrow, on the agenda, I see no sign of
humility. I see no understand And then what has happened, but
all? In fact, what I see is the implementation plan of the EU
global strategy on security and defense in simple English, eu
militarization, the building of a European army. And indeed, Mr.
Juncker used Donald Trump's magnificent victory, to say,
well, that means that NATO won't be here anymore. We have to do
this ourselves, is what you said. And I think this is a huge
and dangerous error. Trump is not a threat to NATO. He wants
it to be redefined. And he wants the members to pay their way. It
is Mr. Juncker, who was a threat to NATO. And you can pretend
today, if you like that your military structure is going to
run in parallel with NATO. But those two structures cannot run
together without being in direct conflict with each other. It was
Tony Blair that first really worried me about this project,
when he said the rationale for the EU today is not peace. It's
about power. Yeah. And already we've seen that power exercised
in terms of foreign policy in the Ukraine, where we have
wantonly provoked Russia into Have you actually got rid of a
democratically elected leader. You know, history is littered
with conflicts caused by empires that seek to expand. And it's
about time the British government actually stood up
tomorrow and said, Enough. This is madness. And we as an
independent United Kingdom will act as the bridge between
America and the nation states of Europe to make sure that NATO is
secure. I also hope tomorrow that we see the British Prime
Minister stop dithering on Brexit. It's been six months
since we voted for our liberation. And at the minute
we're being dictated to by courts and European
commissioners and told what we can and cannot do. I hope we do
that. But I suspect we won't. And I suspect the other 27
leaders will continue on the same course. And that's why you
can all look forward to some even bigger, dramatic shocks
coming in 2017 It's going to be for nation state Democrats. A
very Happy New Year.
Alright, Paul Pierre Dimon says Faraj did not quit. He serving
out his term or until Brexit but he stepped down from the party
leadership.
But he stepped back into it though. Now he's temporary head
of it again as possible. But he's there to give us very
entertainment at one day only gets called on once every two
months or something like that as they go through every one. Yes.
Got it. Boring. His job in history. Yeah. Well, good. Glad
you got that. Okay. Yeah. He tells it like it is. Well, you
want to talk about the one thing that's the most interesting
thing going on right now is Aleppo.
Yes. And because I just I was looking for clips, I was trying
to put it together I couldn't quite make it happen. It just
Aleppo is the interesting because there's a conflict of
information.
And I think there's only a very cute a lot of propaganda with
these cute videos that we're gonna talk about.
I was thinking the cute the cute girl from Canada who's been in
Syria and you have these grilled by somebody in the mainstream
media and choose them out. Yeah, I have that. But I want to start
with here. Here's the basic thesis and I have most of the
clips that cover this. The Western media is trying to sell
a bullcrap story based on absolutely zero reporting.
There's nobody there to report on and
I concur that is the end and by the way, every single video I've
seen is taken from about it let's say it so a guy is you
know shooting as a his Kalashnikov for whatever you
shooting and the video is being shot from about the two o'clock
position. So not even behind him not even behind the barrel, but
from in front to the side. And this is bogus bullshit video.
These guys just shoot and then you're shooting in the air that
is propaganda.
Now the whole thing is all B roll bull crap. So let's start
with a Canadian woman who choose this guy. This is a clip that's
been around as goes around the internet but she's a Canadian
journalist who's called a blogger on one site that doesn't
like her a guy from the Norwegian mainstream media asked
her questions say saying what sorry cuz she's bitching at this
forum about you know, we have an agenda. This is what's the
agenda? We're just reporting we got good stuff and we're
arrogant to sit in a very arrogant, arrogant car. Yeah.
Yeah. timecode timecode R T Canadian journalist vs stooge.
Before I play we could also have like, a 15 kilohertz tone which
wouldn't hear but then I could go back, I could find the tone.
This is asking for more work. This is like a violation of your
basic
is totally a violation of my life principles.
Canadian journalist Eva Bartlett has visited serious several
times in the past few years at a news conference that she
explained why she believes the Western media had his own agenda
when covering the Aleppo crisis.
You talked about the corporate media, the Western media, the
lies and all of this. Could you explain what you think might be
the agenda from us in the Western media, and why we should
lie why the international organizations on the ground
should lie.
So international organizations on the ground tell me which ones
are on the ground in eastern Aleppo? Yeah, okay. I'll tell
you there are none. These organizations are relying on the
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is based in
Coventry US UK, which is one man, they're relying on
compromised groups like the White Helmets, which let's let's
talk about the White Helmets. The White Helmets were fun that
were founded in 2013 by a British ex military officer,
they have been thought funded to the tune of $100 million by the
US, UK and Europe and other states. They purport to be
rescuing civilians in eastern Aleppo and Idlib. Yet no one in
eastern Aleppo has heard of them. And I say no one bearing
in mind that now 95% of these areas of eastern Aleppo are
liberated. The White Helmets purport to be neutral, yet they
can be found carrying guns and standing in the dead bodies of
Syrian soldiers. And their video footage actually contains
children that have been recycled in different reports. So you can
find a girl named Maya, who turns up in a report in month
saying I
love the idea of recycled children. That's just funny.
turns up in the next month, in two different locations, so they
are not credible. So HR is not credible. Unnamed activists are
not credible once or twice, maybe, but every time not
credible. So your sources on the ground, you don't have them the
agenda of some corporate media, it is the agenda of regime
change in 2014 the Syrian politicians they see the problem
as terrorism. They see elements of problems in the system that
they have their But President Assad they don't see the problem
they actually overwhelmingly support him so I'm basing it on
their choice in their leader and I'm basing it on my interactions
with people. God but slack so the best
I liked, I liked that someone else besides us said that the
Syrian Observatory is one guy in the UK and like an apartment and
he's the number one source listed in European Parliament
documents about the properties in Aleppo in Syria in general.
People know this, we know it we talk about it, but the
mainstream media definitely is not going to talk about it.
Instead, they're gonna give you stuff like this is the NBC
reporters Aleppo, one of Aleppo, one NBC, and this is the kind of
reporting you're gonna get from them, making all these crazy
claims
now to the brutal four year long battle for Aleppo that appears
to be near its end this evening. The Russian government allied
with a Syrian regime said today that military action has ceased
and eastern Aleppo, claiming Syrian forces have taken control
of the city from rebels. But as our bill Neely reports,
civilians are still scrambling to get out of Aleppo amid
horrifying reports of executions.
They escaped to slaughter today 1000s Fleeing Aleppo last
battleground, the young and sick, the old and helpless,
besieged for months. Trudging from the ruins of their homes.
They fled a relentless onslaught by regime and Russian forces on
crushing what's left of the rebel East. But not everyone
escaped. Terrifying civilians sending what they call their
last messages that Asad militias are
maybe 300 meters away. No place now to go. The last face
no word tonight have one child seven year old banner whose
latest message read, this is my final moment to either live or
die. The horrors are clear on Aleppo streets, shelling and
airstrikes claiming hundreds of lives. We can't verify this
video for many claims. But the UN is alleging regime militias
are executing civilians in cold blood. They've been going door
to door God executing people on the spot. Well,
first of all going door to door because they got to get out of
there because you know the place is being reclaimed by the
government. But instead of just getting out of there when they
well they can know they're going for Door to Door just shooting
people in the head. Okay, here this makes nothing but sense.
Yeah, here's my
problem. Here's the big problem I have. First of all that seven
year old who did the video, she's verified on Twitter. Okay,
so I'm just saying that is I'd call that a flag.
I would say that's definitely a red flag all of these blue flag
onto
all of these videos. To me smacks of complete propaganda
lying fake news. So this I've seen the videos this place is
rubberized has been realized. I guess the cell phone networks
are still working great so we can get all the videos out or
they have Wi Fi or how are they How is that working? That
infrastructure still works seriously? where they are
and you can get a Twitter Yeah, much because you can get Twitter
Twitter, Twitter. So I like would catch by the way with the
fact that she's verified
and and two days later, I see some of these very same people
doing interviews on the BBC. See this is what I tried to put
together I just didn't have the time to find all the clips. But
I know that this is this is this is you read that now it's bad in
Aleppo for sure. But this is this is not Assad going in
there. I mean, Samantha Powers I don't want to play the that
cloud her and I'm not gonna play it's just I hate I really hate
her. She is She's a horrible person Dick, and she's lying.
She is lying. Well, here's
there's a kicker to this little episode thing I just clipped her
because I have a second part but it says select Bo starts with an
S. And this is stiletto two. And there's the second part of that
report. And there's a very interesting punch line. That to
me just just reiterates what you're saying right there about
the bullcrap
President our sons troops are celebrating victory over the
symbolic city of the revolution, and denying they're committing
atrocities. And people heard we read this area, he says that
they feel safe, but few can be safe, even as the regime boasts
that Aleppo is rebels have stopped fighting, that there'll
be allowed to leave, though it's not clear where from that the
battle here is over. The exodus of misery isn't over. Nor is
this war in so many places beyond Aleppo, bility, NBC News
Beirut.
Hold on a second exodus of misery.
I liked that. But it's Shoto. Did you hear this shine off?
No, don't say it. I mean, roll it back.
Here is over. The exodus of misery isn't over. Nor is this
war in so many places. Beyond Aleppo. billini MBC news.
Beirut,
Beirut. He's not recording from Aleppo.
He's in Beirut, Lebanon. That is 185 miles away from Aleppo.
Yeah. So this is like reporting on the Seattle riots with and
talking about people trudging have all these clips, you know,
slaughter until using words like that and talking about the
Exodus. This is like reporting on that happening in Seattle.
And you're in Portland, Oregon. That's actually a shorter
distance. Right. So the guys in Beirut, so what? Yeah, he's
watching. It'll be in London.
He's watching CNN, and reporting on it. Who knows?
So this is a bogus report in every way.
I think the whole thing is bogus. There's no doubt it's bad
in Aleppo, no doubt. Well, they actually. But here's a pretty
here's a prediction for you. Because this is being used,
obviously. Because it's all be blamed on Russia. The seven year
old Twitter verified kid she's gonna die. That would be that
would be the way to do it. Oh, that's one way first, she
becomes become a little bit more of a celebrity. That's why she
has a Twitter verification. Little more celebrity status
interview here there and then they have to kill her. And yeah,
Dan, and then we'll be angry. Yeah. Damn Assad. And so we'll
have a troll Twitter with your barrel bombs.
Now, here's the Russia Today report on this, which I believe
because they actually have somebody in Aleppo, the only
news outlet that does I think, yeah, and of course, this could
all be bullcrap, too. But no one's said it is. I mean, if
Russia today is going to deliver a phony baloney report, someone
would catch him. This is Aleppo. RT one.
The sound of fighting had eased, and
this is that's not the right one. This is short. RT
Aleppo open. No, no Aleppo. RT one. Sorry. Gotcha.
The State Department has a pretty one dimensional view of
what's happening in eastern Aleppo. Its Spokesman John Kirby
confirmed it today. When asked if you saw reports of people
cheering in eastern Aleppo as the Syrian government was really
taking control of that part of the city.
There are all these reports of The atrocities and so on, and
I'm not in any way questioning their possible credibility. But
also I saw other reports where people are googling, they're
happy to see their army command. They're going to the western
side where they can get, you know, medicine and food and so
on all these things. So it is not all. Just one, one
dimension, kind of,
would you agree with that? No, I don't say I mean, I haven't seen
every picture coming out of Aleppo. I haven't seen honestly
say, I haven't seen any dancing in the streets. Initial dancing
in the streets, this is dancing in the streets.
Many people who are coming out of the war torn eastern Aleppo
or telling stories that contradict the State
Department's view of the situation there. And apparently,
John Kirby never heard those stories from his sources of
information,
we gather the best information that we can from a variety of
sources. Some of its press reporting, no question. A lot of
it comes from reputable agencies that that are either on the
ground or have associates on the ground in Syria, and some of it
comes from intelligence sources, which I'm obviously clearly not
going to get into and secret it's incumbent upon me or
anybody else from a podium to sit there in detail and provide
a laundry list of every single interface he
harping on gyantse digicon. Again, yeah. And what a dick, we
should have played our jingle too, by the way, provide a
good remember, it was it was ation that gives us information.
It's a mosaic. And mosaic. Again, I would encourage you to
go flip on CNN today for yourself, but the imagery that's
coming out of Aleppo by a reputable news organization.
So we did we followed Mr. Covers advice and looked into coverage
of a leper by respect.
Wait a minute, they're on our beat all of a sudden, to back
off RT
Western media outlets. Certainly questions were raised parties.
Well, I think as dia reports,
what's happening in Aleppo is one thing. What the media is
telling you is happening is entirely another
100,000 people are trapped in this city, we're getting reports
of executions, a very grim pictures emerging from inside
Aleppo,
10s of 1000s of civilians are still trapped in the ever
shrinking rebel enclave
complete meltdown on humanity, of just how
trapped these civilians are in Aleppo. If they stay at home,
they could be killed. 10s of
1000s of people remain besieged, trapped in a war zone.
And the source is well someone told them that's it very little
of what you see in the Western media about a level is verified.
After all. They've got no one on the ground. What they do have
are exaggerated headlines. Yes.
I'm telling you. Seven year old Twitter girl dead.
I like to prediction I think you might be right. I mean, she
won't be the obvious he obviously won't be dead. No,
that just changed her. Her. She's like the girl they use the
Canadian woman pointed out where she is in this scene wishes and
some other reason actress recycling children. Yeah, she's
going to be recycled. Ah,
that's funny. Man. Can we go
talk to you? Yeah, it's actually disgusting. To me to watch this
this play out. Mainly because we're not getting nobody has the
guts to go there. It's just unbelievable. Just unbelievable.
Here's a guy. This just came out before the leppa was was
liberated this from a couple of days ago. And it's from last
show. I didn't play it. But this is that guy. Wilkerson. He's on
one of these. One of the cable news shows. Yeah, we'll
percentage if you remember is the general Osun. Lieutenant
General or Lieutenant Colonel? Oh, yeah. Okay. I know. Yeah.
He's the guy who used to be the aide de camp for Colin Powell.
And he's the one so this is bullcrap. They they came up and
told us to read this in the front of the United Nations.
He's just a grouser. But he has he has a little interesting
insight here that I thought was at least worth playing.
Russia seemed to forget that it wasn't Moscow who equipped,
trained and sponsored these rebels so that they became
capable of capturing and holding Aleppo for more than four years
while terrifying its residence. I
detected that probably the most powerful opposition element is
resident in the United States of America. It isn't on the ground
in Syria fighting tooth and nail for its so called rights,
liberty and democracy and that sort of thing that I have never
been able to detect in Syria, a substantial militarily capable
force of Jeffersonian Democrats designed to unseat Bashar Al
Assad. In fact, quite the contrary,
in short, whichever way Aleppo is for sure. This have rolled
the only certainties hearing that tried and tested formula of
the past few years. Whatever happens blame Russia
Canada must be pissed used to blame everything on them now
it's all Russia. Yeah, well it's Darn it. Darn it. Yeah. Well,
the a lot of things coming to head is gonna be a very
interesting week. Or yeah, let's let's no doubt about it. Yeah,
it's gonna be it's gonna be very, very interesting week,
we'll have to see how this all comes together. But this Aleppo
stuff, and I'm gonna see if I can put something together for
Sunday. With these desperate, please. 300 They're only 300
meters away from us. They're gonna kill us. We're all gonna
die. Luckily, I have internet. And I can do an interview with
the BBC in two days. Let me check my calendar for my veils.
Talk to my agent. Talk to my agent. Yeah. Can you play this
clip? Because I'm just wondering what it is because I've
misspelled it completely, which is very rare for me. You have
a breach? Yeah, I was looking at that myself. It's spelled yah.
PP. I'm gonna guess Yahoo breach moving. There is no, that's it
stops. I'm gonna start with that. We do that in tech news.
Do that tech news.
We'll do that later. Okay.
I have to I want to do those things on cash. You don't mind?
Cash is king. Yeah, well, not in India. We know that. Modi took
away the 500 and 1000 rupee notes and it is a crisis.
What are the five Lam much is a rupee? It's like 10 to one.
I don't know what a rupee is.
I think some like that. Um, let me look it up by us. But that
sounds like gentlemen, should they took away the $100 bill and
the $50 bill. Yeah.
And yes, and the problem is, of course, most people in India use
cash. And this is a very nice drivers are here and this is a
thing this came from might have come from EURO NEWS, but their
local correspondent and you'll see that the entire it's
working, you know, get everyone to get a bank account digital
money. Here we go for a
month now. This has become the new normal. Now hundreds of
people queue up for us outside banks to withdraw money. On
November 8, with only a few hours notice. The Indian
government demonetised all 501,000 rupee bills, that's 86%
of all currency in circulation. Frustration is mounting among
the people.
When you're one of my three children, we queue up here every
day. Sometimes we can't even withdraw one single rupee
I took leave yesterday to withdraw.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi says the move is meant to target
black money, a term commonly used for the country's parallel
shadow economy. In India 70% of all transactions are done in
cash. Most of them are undeclared. But the new currency
notes are gradually being injected into the system. But
not fast enough for the economy to function. Normally. The
scarcity of notes also affects the 300 million Indians who do
not have bank accounts. So you get overwhelmed by the number of
customers. This bank has set up a temporary branch outside to
help people open new accounts with the bank's overwhelmed by
influx flux of customers.
Used to be about 200 flights a day 5000
lines ever since my childhood, I've never had a bank. But
because of the many planets we have with cash right now, I got
to know that bank accounts can now be easily opened on the
streets. So I came here.
I'm keeping a very close eye on this. This to me is a test. And
I think it's going to be very successful for them because
people are now getting cell phones to do banking and of
course, right we know that we love electronic money. This is
exactly where governments want you to be. and the EU has been
trying under the guise of well, the 500 euro note is really only
used by drug dealers. So we should get rid of that. And they
may get rid of the 100. At the same time they you know, in the
Netherlands you can some places you can't even pay with cash.
It's pin only and hello Australia.
Do you have a $100 bill in your wallet right now?
I'm guessing not in fact, I recommended to the average
Australian quite a while to realize if they disappeared
altogether. I'd certainly have no idea. But UBS analysts say
that we should turf the $100 note and they throw down a
couple of facts as to why. First, there are $300,000,100
notes in Australia, but they're almost never used by the general
population. Second, that means that they're almost three times
as many $100 bills and $5 bills by number and third 92% of all
currency by value in this country is held in 50s and 100.
Anyway, so they're ratcheting it up in Australia. And this is all
going towards a common goal and I was thinking the other day
What kind of problems the lack of cash brings along with it?
Daddy? Yeah, so of course downtown here in Austin Second
Street is kind of where I where I live and you know me but I see
someone on the street and give them a fiver if they asked me
for money I give him now that
he got to give him a credit card they had to have a credit card
you got to look where you got to square you got to have a
smartphone,
debit smartphone you have to have a computer of some sort.
Yeah, that can take your credit cards. So screw the poor
Yes, yes, that is and that's what they did in India and it's
working just fine
yeah, let them die let them die in the streets that's pretty
money belong that's what they've you know Indians are a bunch of
people that believe in Nova generally speaking that Hindus
believe in reincarnation that they're they're poor because
there would be reincarnated there were jerk offs when they
were the other person. I think they're not this is
this is sick. They're being recycled. This is sick. It is it
really is. And it's so wrong. I mean, I like paying with Apple
Pay don't get me wrong, but I have cash always. Crazy Crazy.
And yeah. Before we thank some people, I want to thank the
drill sergeant I think he's our head mofo in charge or head mofo
in charge. And he sent me a hoodie from his brand which is
his brand is as M D s. SS DSS which is awesome shit. My drill
sergeant says, is a great hoodie. John, you I am good. I
think you'll like time code. On the front, it says sweat dries
blood clots bones heal. And the back it says suck it up
buttercup.
Yeah, some you should wear around. Austin.
Oh, you don't think I'm going to?
Yes, actually, I don't think you're going to
I'm going to show my school by donating to no agenda. Imagine
all the people who could do that. Oh yeah, that'd be fun No,
we do have a few people. Thank you. We'll start with PD. Daddy
cast and Josh love. All righty Parts Unknown USA $110.20.
Michael Reed in Hancock, Maryland. $101 and ones is a
shortlist by the way to them. Yeah, it is a little short are
at 88 saqa eights, two people Yancey summer our summer are and
Houston, Texas and Sir Daniel Ehrlich in Boalsburg,
Pennsylvania.
Okay, those are 280 eights, which of course is ham code for
hugs and kisses.
And we have boobs. Yeah, boo, Roger boots, Mechanicsville,
Iowa and Gerald Preston in Bennington, Nebraska. Oh, and
also David, Wooster, Bong in Milwaukee.
Those are three Oh, Strabane poster poster.
And Adam lukovitch In King Ontario.
I think I think of it she's not a cabbage.
But I say look, if if if kovich Okay. And King Ontario 55
Christopher Dolan in Brookline, Massachusetts. 5150. Boom, down
to the $50 donors already. Bam. We did very poorly in this show.
Kent O'Rourke. These are all $50 the name and place Kent O'Rourke
no place. Tyson rock. Rauch Rauch Rauch I'm sure of it in
London. London, Canada. He
has a call.
Oh, yes. Okay, let's do it says
a guy's birthday for wife when we see if that's even on the
list. Yes, it is Tyson Rauch
longtime listener. It's his birthday for wife who's a
longtime listener and douchebag Jennifer
turns the magic number on the 1733 All right.
I don't know. 33. Trevor Hoagland in Portland Oregon.
Brandon sub why? Brandon Good to hear from him. No, Brandon if
you're not a sir. Dane Patricia Worthington in Miami, Florida.
This sir Mike Westerfield and I think he's in LA. Anonymous in
Marquette, Michigan, Christopher Flynn and Groton, Connecticut.
John Heller in Missoula, Montana. Jason Brockman in
Hamilton, Ohio, Simon horn and manly Queensland, Sir Chris
Lewinsky and Sherwood Park, Alberta. And that concludes our
group of well wishers and producers for show 886 with two
to go, you know, the holidays are catching up to us. Hey,
are we doing a show on January 1? Now? Yeah, yeah. Okay, just
checking. It's a Sunday.
Yeah, but the real holiday is the day before. And the Sunday
is, you know, people. I don't think a lot of listeners but
no, that's what I was thinking.
I mean, we could skip it but I I kind of feel like doing the show
on January 1.
Okay. Yeah, I agree. We'll kick off the new year. kick off the
new year just will rock the Michael rock the mic. Right.
Right. Mike will rock the mic writes. Thank you everybody.
Even though it was a tad on the low side. Thank you. For those
you who did support us. Is there a value for value model we bring
you the value? We don't we're not beholden to advertisers to
political groups or anybody but you are producers. That's how it
works. And of course, thanks everyone who came in under $50.
Usually for reasons of anonymity. Another show on
sunday.org/and A for those who needed some karma.
You've got karma.
Well, that also means a short list of the birthdays Don
O'Malley says he has certain doom he says Happy Birthday to
his youngest Delilah. She turns eight. She turned eight
yesterday. Congratulate her earlier also says Happy birthday
it was douchebag wife Jennifer turning 33 on the 17th Happy
birthday from everybody here the best podcast in the universe.
But having 299
Good grief for that. I'm sorry.
Grief, grief, can get great going to douchebag you're
probably two nice things today John, there is my Zico,
Zico, Zico, Zika.
We need Truman child and David are up on the podium please
Gentlemen, welcome over here. Do you see the roundtable the no
agenda Knights and Dames that is where you will take place as I
am now. Very proud to bring you into the roundtable i pronounced
the game D here by Sir Truman and certainly be of the 20
meter. Gentlemen, you are now both nights at the Norwegian
roundtable we have for you hookers and blow rent boys and
Chardonnay, White Widow and brownies, cookies and vodka,
kilts and kilter, lifted Ale, espresso and hidden milk
crickets and cream DMT and astral travel, fresh milk and
pablor mutton and me ginger ale and gerbil sparkling escorts
bong hits and bourbon, vanilla, hasten, sockeye, ruminants women
and Rosie winches severe and long haired heavy metal guys and
scotch. Very nice.
East Africa,
East Africa, East Africa, head on over to no agenda
nation.com/rings Give Eric the show your details. And we'll
make sure your awards go out to as soon as possible. And make
sure you retweet that stuff that you see our Dame who retweeted
her night ring at her ham rig.
Oh, I just noticed no. I didn't see they had someone
that dynamite did a ring on her finger. She had her hand.
Oh yes. She had the ring on the on the front of pointing
fingers. Fantastic. I saw that. That was very good phones a
landline. And the phone should be made out of Bakelite.
Everybody screw the tech onesie. I don't know what they're
talking about. The only tech news is right here. On the no
agenda show tech news. John, you had some tech news.
I have a bunch of tech news. Actually, let's play the start
off with the Uber launch apparently Ubers launching
illegally in San Francisco. Inside a nondescript warehouse
South of Market a fleet of vehicles is shrouded in secrecy.
Tonight, we watched as some of them emerged and drove around
the block. Turns out these are self driving cars from Uber. And
they're about to start picking up customers on the streets of
San Francisco. So says derocher of CNET who broke the story.
This person
familiar with the launch told me that they would be rolling out
very soon. I have since got further confirmation that the
launch will be happening tomorrow,
a launch she says much like the one in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
in September. We're customers who need a ride, just use the
Uber app. And now there's a good chance a driverless car will
show up
and the self driving cars will come. I believe with a safety
driver and Pittsburgh, you're not alone in the car. And I
presume that they'll be doing the same sort of thing hand San
Francisco.
Most of the self driving Uber cars we've seen tonight are
Volvo SUVs. They've got a whirly gig on the top that is some sort
of computerized device
that What did you call it a whirly gig? She Yeah, I like
that. Oh worldly. I've got a really good
SUVs. They've got a really big on the top. That is some sort of
computerized device that helps map the streets, LIDAR markings
on the side.
I think it's pretty cool. I would probably try it.
Does it make you nervous to not have a driver?
Not really. I mean, I'm assuming that they've tested it and they
know what they're doing. But I mean, there's a small risk, I'm
sure yeah,
the California
DMV tells KPI x five that Uber does not yet have a testing
permit you issued by the State, quote 20 manufacturers have
already obtained permits to test hundreds of cars on California
roads. Uber should do the same. Wow, violation of the DMV
apparently busted him too. So you get those cars off the
streets. Hey,
you know, I was reading the Department of Transportation.
This is tech news, has proposed a new rule, which would mandate
vehicle to vehicle communications. So cars would
talk to each other and they think this is a good idea.
Yeah, this was a Ford initiative, as far as I know.
And I first heard about it about five or six years ago, Ford does
these meetups with the media and they described as they thought,
at the time, they thought self driving cars was a loser, even
though they've changed their mind, right? They think self
driving cars is a loser. And the real future was these networks
network cars. So they all talk to each other just so now
somebody I think it was a lobbyist. I don't know how they
got this passed, but they this is the backstory is these car
companies?
Oh, Professor Kaczynski would not be happy with this. I'm sure
he wouldn't. This is what's called V two V vehicle to
vehicle advanced vehicle technologies may well prove to
be the silver bullet in saving lives on our
roadways. seems unlikely. That's what
it's all about, though. And it's it's going to be I mean, it'll
take years of course before but before we see it in cars, but
they're going to make it a rule. And it's going to happen you'll
have to have it and privacy I mean read from their own
document here is also protected in v two V safe. V two V
technology does not involve the exchange of information link to
or as a practical matter linked linkable to an individual, and
the rule would require extensive privacy and security controls in
any v two V devices. Aha, sure. You know, why don't you just
kill us all just had the cars driving around. Who needs the
humans are the irritating part.
So it Well, there you go. So insofar as privacy is concerned,
this Yahoo breach, which turns out to be another one that took
place in 2013, that they never told their customers about
leaving, there is late word from Yahoo tonight of a massive and
stunning security breach, the company revealing that hackers
may have stolen the personal information for more than a
billion Yahoo users. The hack apparently occurred over three
years ago, but it's just now being made public. What's more,
the eye popping breaches apparently separate from the
major attack announced by the company just a few months ago,
and VCs Miguel Alma gear has late details
in what is one of the largest hacks in US history. Today,
Yahoo confirms data from more than 1 billion user accounts was
stolen in 2013. Private names, email addresses, telephone
numbers, dates of birth, even encrypted security questions and
answers have been exposed.
Man. Hey, is this after the is the is the sale done? This is
information after the sale.
It seems like this seems like information they keep bringing
out so yeah, who can't be sold?
I mean, this is this is totally material adverse change in in
valuation. I mean, this is Oh, yeah, big time. I mean, it might
be vaguely big legally. Maybe we should shut this thing down.
Just shut it down. No, I'm sorry for the people who are working
there but shut it down. There's the Flickr is worth more by
itself probably than Yahoo.
Yeah, that's That's true. Well, it was kind of the kind of screw
up everything they buy so flickers. Probably not worth as
much as it used to be.
I hate it. So I have a little, little, little bit of tech news.
Good. I think this is not nefarious, but it's being
reported as such. Just to show you that crap reporting from the
DOJ, Georgia Secretary of State and while you'll hear the
reports a local report in an exclusive
interview of visibly frustrated Georgia Secretary of State Brian
Kemp confirmed 10 separate cyber attacks of different levels on
his agency's network over the last 10 months that are traced
back to the United States Department of Homeland Security
IP addresses
we've been told something that they think they haven't figured
out yet nobody's really shown us how this happened. Kemp told
us his office is cybersecurity vendor discovered the additional
so called vulnerability scans to his networks firewall after a
massive mid November cyber attack triggered an internal
investigation. The Secretary of State's office manages Georgia's
elections and most concerning for camp about the newly
discovered scans the timing. The first one on February 2 happened
the day after Georgia's voter registration deadline, the next
one just days before the SEC primary another in May the day
before the general primary plus two in November the day before
and the day of the presidential election
that makes you wonder if somebody was trying to prove a
point last week,
DHS confirmed the large November 5 Teeth hack traced back to a US
Customs and Border Protection Internet Gateway. But cam says
DHS story about its source keeps changing.
First it was a it was an employee in Corpus Christi now
as a contractor in Georgia,
and unsatisfied with the response he got from DHS
Secretary Jeh Johnson this week Kemp fired off this letter
Wednesday to Lupin President Elect Donald Trump,
we just need to ask the new administration to take a look at
this and make sure that we get the truth that people of Georgia
deserve and to know that, and really Domaining
Yeah, this is so dumb. So here's what I conclude from this
report. First of all, the way the guy uses in one instance
says security scan, I think that's proper usage of what
happened the proper term. And then he says, well, they hacked
into this and was the time, it seems to me like maybe the DHS
was doing port scan security scans to see if these databases
and other stuff were open or not. It doesn't seem that
nefarious to me, they should have alerted them and let them
know. Yeah, but this doesn't see and get just sports scanning.
You have security scans, companies do them all the time.
So I'm just I'm a little annoyed by the reporting, if anything,
well on well, you should be. Thanks now.
Now, I want to drop Trump and the texts
trumping the text. Now, here's an interesting thing. That
friend sent me this from the Wall Street Journal, The Wall
Street Journal mapped out who is at this meeting that Trump had
his meeting in his tower with all these tech CEOs he had, I'll
tell you who they weren't Jeff Bezos and Larry Page and Sheryl
Sandberg, and Peter Thiel and Tim Cook, the genie RAM rom
Mehdi, IBM, IBM CEO. The funny thing is, Marissa Meyer wasn't
there. When I saw the back shot one of the shots I thought it
was her for sure, because of the hairdo that Ginny had. It was
just way too. It's just unbelievable. Blonde hair is
beautiful. And I didn't I thought it would be all as
Marissa even though you have to show her face. Oh, it was Maria.
No, no, Marissa. Oh, Ivanka, Joe Trump, Derek. But anyway, so
they got this map. Now is a little side note here. The tech
news? Yeah. They have a map. They showed worse air who was
sitting it were at the table, which is valuable information,
because it shows you what Trump thinks of people but where they
placed him this was yes, and I'm gonna Sandburg was
next to pants. That's what I saw. That's about all I saw.
Yes, she was. Now here's the way and I think she was in a good
spot. Here's the um, here's this a kind of a long winded way of
putting this. I'm absolutely convinced that Donald Trump back
in 1975 90. And 76 did what everybody did in those years,
which was read Michael quarters book power, how to get it, how
to use it.
I remember my parents reading this, I think
this is a very famous book. This was there was two interesting
little fads in book selling that took place one of the late 60s
and one in the middle 70s, the late 60s books came out and they
were all sex books. The joy of sex, I think was the number one
bestseller. And there were a slew of these books that just
talked about different sex positions and how you're gonna
have sex standing on your head. Now you're gonna have sex this
way in that way. And that was in the late 60s.
Your question? Why do you put so much emphasis on the word sex?
You say this exact dirty like sex? Yeah, well,
I would these books were dirty. I'll tell you that dirty, these
books really dirty. And but they're hot. They're hot, gray
hot sellers. Oh, hot. So by the time the mid 70s came along, a
slew of these power books came out how to become powerful how
to do this. And I think this had to do with the depression of the
70s, where we really felt so helpless. And you know, there's
also the Vietnam war that was being resolved. There's a lot of
things going on that would create a need for these books.
When people could read these books. The court a book was
absolutely dynamite, you can get a used copy of it. I would
recommend everybody one of our listeners to get it, you will
not regret it. One of the things in the book that the only thing
I actually remember almost verbatim is how to sit at a big
table in a conference. Ah, really? Yes.
In fact, I used to get because that gets you six or what is it?
It's just there's different spots that you want to know
about their power spots. Power, you don't want to sit in the
weak side. And I got by now I mentioned this is an anecdote by
fit. And I was actually always stunned by this that when at me
vo they had this meeting room with his big power table. And
Ron Blum always sat at the absolute weakest spot. I don't
think he ever read the quarter book. The weakest spot added at
a long table is the middle of the side which is the short side
as long side as the short side, the short side in the middle.
with your back to the door is the most weak, wimpy use aside
do never sit there never sit.
What is the power position?
The most powerful position is the head of the table at the
other side looking towards the door. Yeah. The middle of that
is the power position. In this case, what they called the
children's table in the Wall Street Journal, which was
bullcrap they had, they had sitting at the power and was, I
have no idea what the backstory is for this one guy, which is
Brad Smith, the president legal officer, Microsoft is sitting in
the corner, facing the door, at the at the right side, and then
in the middle was Ivanka and Eric. And the other corner
opposite of where Brad Smith was, would be Donald Trump Jr.
This is the King and Queen spot. So Ivanka and Jr. And Eric, no,
Eric, Eric Eric, Jr. Would be the 32nd string. But this is the
power spots. Those are the two most powerful, they don't have
to say anything. Because what the way Trump set this up, he
put himself along and
yeah, yeah, go ahead. Go ahead.
He put himself he put himself in the middle of the long end of
the table. And you can be on either side to do this. But he
was on the side that was facing where all the cameras are gonna
be. Yeah, that middle of the long side is considered the
judge ship. You have us sit at that spot. And you're the guy
that can be the judge. You're the you're in the middle, you're
your neutral, because you got the two ends that weak side and
the strong side. Yeah, you're the neutral guy who can sit
there that's a perfect spot for him. Man across from him.
Sitting next to him was Pence on the one side and tail on the
other. Oh, interesting. Directly across
was he separating the two because I'm sure pence wanted to
kill him because he's gay.
Nobody's sitting next to cook which is funny. Directly across
from Trump and the drug free across him those three which
represent the like a Supreme Court with Trump in the middle
and the other two guys supporting across from him would
be the kind of the other side of the power coin, and that means
Trump was directly across the Marantz Priebus. Which means
that he would be the number two guy in the in the pecking order.
And then next to Priebus was Bannon on one side who was
sitting next to Eric Schmidt. And then on the other side of
Priebus was number 16, which is Kushner. The son Oh, wow. And
now the way they the The Wall Street Journal has it has the
power guests, which is bullcrap. Because he's not the power guest
necessarily. Schmidt. And number 15. Was Chuck Robbins, the CEO
of Cisco. No, no, no,
no, no, these are not the power. Yes, no. No.
And, and on his on the weak side, again, it was back to the
door or three of the Cabinet members that did not have to
speak or anything that was perfect.
I thought, what's her face? Lean forward girl. She had a powerful
spot next to pan she did. And she was she was close to him to
very close.
She was right next depends. Yeah, but I just felt like she
was closer than that was a power spot. Larry Page was a power
spot next to her. And then Jeff Bezos was kind of in the corner,
which is less of a power spot. But that side of the table is
very powerful. 678 and nine was teal cook. And then the eighth
guy, which is the CEO of Oracle or xes, co CEO of Oracle. And
then Musk was on the kind of a very weak position. And so was
let's see, Raumati I thought was weak. Oh, the Microsoft CEO
Satya Nadella Nadella says that said, yeah, he was an extremely,
he was the weakest of all the corporate spots. And so I was
looking at this thing as this was there's no doubt in my mind
because
where was Elon?
Elon was in a weak spot across from the Microsoft. He
was just he was just a token wasn't a huge line. Borderline
back to the door spot. Yeah, just a token just to get
everyone because now I've even read on the face bag people
going. Wow, that's kind of cool. He brought Elon in as an
advisor. That's great.
Pricing. Anybody know. But the point do is when I saw this map
initially, and especially this poor interpretation of the map
of the table by the Wall Street Journal, who apparently doesn't
know what they're doing, especially with this children's
table nonsense, at the most powerful part of the table, do
you really? Yeah. Is it was just, it was ridiculous. This
was and when I saw this, I said this, somebody and I'm sure it's
Trump read that book and did the same thing I did. I remembered
this part. The book where this table these tables are designed
where you should sit, how you should sit. And I mean, I still
use to this day when I go into a meeting, I find a spot that is
not weak. And I sit there, I don't say I genuinely don't sit
at the head of the table. And I I will sit where Trump's that
kind of thing that means that Judge ship kind of spot tend to
sit in, in this spot. In this case, I tend to put myself into
a corner facing the door. In this case, I think is a very
powerful spot considered part of the children's table but not
really Brian crass niche, the CEO of Intel was sitting seated
or was seated pretty much where I would sit.
Ah. Well, his stuff isn't everybody else's stuff. Yeah, if
you want to talk to a lot, but I have a little report on this,
which clears up the Elan thing but of course also introduces
the Jack Dorsey issue.
We are looking live in Trump Tower where President Elect
Donald Trump in about 90 minutes will now excuse me Well, now we
will welcome a who's who, from the tech industry for a summit
on jobs and the economy. Among those there will be top
executives from IBM, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google and
Facebook, some of whom have voiced concerns about Mr.
Trump's vow to tighten immigration restrictions,
especially on his criticism of the special visa is used to
lower the high value foreign workers Silicon Valley relies
upon and many of those leaders were very vocally opposed to Mr.
Trump during the campaign. So David, I'm gonna go with you.
There's reports that these people had a hard time being
bored in to take this meeting. Jack Dorsey from Twitter not
going very interesting, given that Donald Trump has sort of
made Twitter great again, he is.
Well, exactly that's true, but but he has very, very definitive
views against him. I
think it's interesting that some people came back like Elon Musk,
remember? Yes, he
was gonna do it. He depends on the government to help him
support a lot of his projects.
Not all projects, all of his projects.
Yes. He's a government. He's a his expertise is getting he's
getting money government government. Yeah. Now. First of
all, grid analysis, John, I enjoy that. Immensely. That's
very cool. Tell me about dotnet. So this report said Dorsey
didn't want to go he didn't come.
I don't know that he was invited.
Well, that's why that's why I was wondering if you had any
info and what did they? I mean, I
thought he wasn't invited because there was a battle
between Trump and and Twitter about using the
the cricket emoji most
outrageously think about it. Oh, man, what
a world we're living in. We arguing about here. So what do
you I haven't really heard much announced about what they talked
about other than Yeah, h1 B. Okay. Sure. They must work on
other stuff.
I think the most honest analysis was a Trump called them in so
they could kiss the ring. Yeah. And to show him who was boss,
right. And his kid, the only thing that I heard from it that
somebody recorded somehow was that he said, you don't, you've
got, you've got my phone number, you have a problem. You don't
have to go through channels. We have no structure that requires
you go through channels. Just call me
right. Yes. Yeah, he did say that. Just email me.
Yeah, email or whatever.
I think it's I think this kind of fits in, in tech news, a bill
that I stumbled across the missing Alzheimer disease
patient Alert program.
Now we have a great yeah, I remembered I heard of this too.
I didn't. Well, they tried it. They
tried to do this in the 90s. And now it's now it's a new bill.
And so this is to help people with Alzheimer's because of
course, it's horrible. It's a horrible disease. But here's how
they propose to do it. In consultation, but but here we
go, shall establish standards and practices. This is Section
302. And this is House Bill 4919 four nine or one Niner.
establish standards and best practices relating to the use of
permanent tracking technology where a guardian or parent in
consultation with the individual's health care
provider has determined that a permanent tracking device or non
permanent tracking device is the least restrictive alternative to
locate individuals as described below. And then of course, this
is for people who are confused and walk off but this is I find
this a little dodgy
because it's it's about implants right? Oh
no, they are saying in the language specifically non
invasive types of tracking devices, but that would just be
a one small change down the road. But they're talking about
collection use retention of the data, which of course is only by
you be used by by the government to prevent injury or death to
the patient because it will be shared with a gun But that's the
idea. It's kind of like, low Jack. There it is as low jack
for people. And so of course, you know, when you need to
activate your last person, then you have to call the authorities
and then they activate the people Oh Jack. I don't know how
often this happens that people with Alzheimer's wander off and
and hurt someone else or die, but seems like a lot of work to
help these people just
they want to get their foot in the door for that verse shipping
everybody. Yes. That's what the paranoid screwballs have been
saying for years. But it's it's a great idea if you can chip the
public
and listen to this. The number of state, local, tribal, local
law enforcement public safety agencies that receive funding
include for the fall. So here's other other entities that will
be involved in this program. So training I have here, again, law
enforcement companies of the headquarter local offices who
provide the tracking technology that's used by state, local and
tribal law enforcement, nonprofit organizations,
including their headquarters,
they actually put tribal law enforcement in that list. Yes,
sir.
And check this out. The number of missing children with autism
or another developmental disability with wandering
tendencies or adults with Alzheimer's being served by the
program. So they're talking about doing this to kids with
with autism, which is pretty much every kid because you're on
the spectrum, you see. Yeah. So you know, we're gonna have
tracking devices for my autistic kid in case he goes nuts and
wanders off, and the government has it.
Yeah, well, that way you can track everything you do. I mean,
they kind of do that with cars now. I mean, yeah, the sure they
do the Fast Track thing for the bay bridges in the around San
Francisco Bay area. That tracking device which I keep it
I don't keep it out. But it's tracking you all over the place.
It's just not. Oh, yeah. The whole city attracts you
absolutely. attraction to the entire cities. That is not just
Yeah, tracks, you're going through the bridge and say is
your tolls paid? And then you go but once you're in the city,
you're being there's all these little inductors all over the
place that just keep tracking, they just record you know what
car went by, right? That's what they want everybody to use these
things. I use it because I think it's really convenient. But I I
don't have it glued to the car. I have it. I put it on the
dashboard. When it goes through the bridge. Yeah. Then I put it
in my glove box. So you should put it in your I know, aluminum
foil or Faraday Can you can
just use your hat. It's no problem. I'm fold the hat and
it'll work. Yeah. All right, everybody. I'm not dead nuts.
That is what we call tags. My phone? Less than 10 minutes to
go. Okay. 10 minutes to go, John. Less than 1010.
Okay, well, let's see what we got to get.
I have some I have some, I guess. This is just just because
I didn't play it. You actually had two clips you couldn't play
yet. Here is Andrea Mitchell. Talking about the Trump
transition team. And the Nazis are in against the climate
scientists. There
was a very controversial questionnaire that their energy
transition team sent out to everyone in the Energy
Department at high levels, asking for the names of anyone
who helped negotiate the Paris Climate Change accord. And it
was basically asking for top senior people to be identified.
It was viewed by a lot of people in energy and in the
environmental world as a potential hit list of people to
get rid of
a controversial approach. Nobody can remember anything quite that
intrusive from a transition team
incredibly controversial. Andrea a 74 point questionnaire in
addition to the questions you just mentioned, it also asked
had energy staffers attended climate change meetings or
briefing so this really dug deep to try to get to the heart of
this issue. And of course, the concern is that there will be
some blowback against those energy officials who have
participated in these meetings.
Drain the Swamp, I guess through smoke them out. Maybe they just
wanted to meet and see what information you had. I don't
know. It's always so boring.
Oh, no. They try and dig there's a hit list. They want to kill
him.
I love the hitless bit. Did you hear Denzel Washington on? He
was interviewed about fake news.
No, I didn't hear Denzel was pretty good. About this fake
news.
You were the subject of fake news.
Oh, yeah. What they say I was running for president. Oh.
Switch Yeah, fake news. If you don't read the newspaper, you're
uninformed. If you do read it, you're misinformed.
That's a great question. What is the long term effect of doing a
great question, one of the effects is the need to be first
not even to be true anymore. So whatever responsibility you all
have, to be to tell the truth, not just to be first, but to
tell the truth. We live in a society now where it's just
first who cares get it out there. We don't care who it
hurts. We don't care who we destroy. We don't care if it's
true. Just say it sell it. Anything you practice you'll get
good at include including BS.
I did. Like that's not his quote. I'm sure. Yeah. If you
read the newspaper, if you don't read on, I've heard that before
whose quote is that?
It's old. Okay, just not new phenomenon. All right. All
right. I got an interesting anomaly. Okay, tell me what you
find peculiar about this. 15 second advertisement. Okay. With
the Crimson Tide commercial. Oh, that is a
that's a form of washing powder for the washing machine. All
right, Thomas. Lilly.
She pretty much lives in her favorite princess dress. But
once a week I let her play Sheriff so I can wash it. I use
time to get out those weak old stains and downy to get it fresh
and soft. Tide and downy together.
Yeah, that's pushing the child towards a multi genderism.
Yeah. Megan, the man the house man.
Yeah, the man is the man is the woman and the and the daughter
becomes the son. It's it's meant to confuse us profusely I
presume? I'm guessing I don't
understand this itself was washing powders the question? I
have no idea. Well, when we look, I just find it peculiar. I
mean, it's a gender neutral, I would say or you're more more
sinister the way you have it. Yes. And I found it to be odd. I
thought it'd be odd. I didn't. I wasn't offended by it. Because I
mean, I buy washing detergent myself. Yes. But I will give a
washing detergent tip for people out there. Listen to no agenda
show for these rare
gentlemen, a washing machine tip from John C. Dvorak.
Okay, so I was good course a part of my job I was meeting
with in some situation with Colgate Palmolive. And they told
me given this tip before on the show, but I think people should
should know it. If you're going to buy detergents, whether it's
a dishwashing detergent, or laundry detergent or anything
that's you expect to clean something with, always get the
liquid.
Always the liquid. Yes.
And here's the reason. Okay. I was told what's happened over
the years is some of this stuff that the way laundry detergent
was first discovered was they they led to a bunch of the soaps
that they made dry up and it became flakes. And so they
developed a laundry detergent, it was just a powder and you
dump it in and you'd clean with it. But
over the years, basically a secondary product that was a
byproduct of the original.
Yeah. Oh, but you can't but what happened was they banned all the
phosphates and other chemicals that used to be great cleaners
that you could turn into powder.
And ban them was it killing people? No, it was environmental
it was the EPA and others because it was making like
blooms of algae and lakes and it was causing, you know, water
lilies to grow out of control. It was it was it's a food for
the phosphates or a food for plant life. And so it was a
problem. So they banned all this stuff. So they had to
reformulate to produce these new chemicals that did as good a job
of cleaning but they could not make it into a powder. It
wouldn't powder arise. So they started selling this idea of
liquid and so liquid if you want to have anything that actually
cleans unless you're in Mexico where they still sell the old
original stuff, but you want to in the United States if you want
anything that actually cleans and works it has to be liquid
now. First of all, thank you for this tip that is let me just jot
ladies and gentlemen John C. Dvorak with a tip and only the
tip as he has no mister tip would you since you know of
course, we talk about all kinds of products on the show products
that we like products that we don't like because we're not
paid we don't know advertisement. I would like to
know what is your liquid detergent of choice.
I do like tide. But knowing that these formulations are pretty
universal, I'll buy anything if it's on sale. So I use tide I
use air I use all I use all I use the pens but tide, I believe
to be probably one of the best formulations you could buy
especially the ones and but there's a lot of different
formulations you have to kind of pick and choose which one you
want. If you want the fake bleach that's in TIDE, which is
actually an insult.
I'll tell you I am a I'm a tide man myself. Yeah. And that is
because with for the three months I went to college in West
Virginia, my roommate, Tyree Hamilton, from Newark, black
kid, he, he taught me how to wash my clothes properly. He
also taught me how to moisturize let me tell you the black guys
know how to moisturize and and so and he said tide man nothing.
It's only tide he did. There was no I don't remember if we I
think we had liquid. But I've been a tide the tide man ever
since.
Yeah, well, you probably were using some powders.
I've never used the powders in school.
You never took a powder. Never took a
powder? Well, yeah, we used to snort. diet pills.
You did really good admitting to that.
Yeah. It was it was West Virginia.
Oh, yeah. Okay. Yeah.
Thank you. All right, thanks. My final clip for today. We of
course, assert that the pharmaceutical industry pretty
much keeps the mainstream media running. And if you watch and
you're under the age of 60, you're not going to be very
compelled to buy any of the products that are advertised
because it's all pharmaceuticals. And it's
usually for people who were over the age of 60. Nice to see it
corroborated that it's all working just well in this report
from HLN. Headline News.
Why in six American adults are taking psychiatric psychiatric
drugs according to a new study. And researchers say most of them
are antidepressants. But what really worries them is the
majority of the people in the study have been using the drugs
for a long period of time. Experts say doctors and patients
need to periodically evaluate whether they need to keep taking
the drugs. people older than 60 seem to be taking the drugs than
most
dog. One in six. Why would anybody take these drugs and
makes you feel why did people take drugs makes you feel good?
But you know that just makes you lethargic and dumb and addicted.
That's the problem
that suicidal? Well, yeah,
there's that. There's that with the Chantix. All right, John, I
think that's about all I've got. Other than that Wonderwoman has
been fired from the United Nations gig. That's sad. Oh,
yeah, they got rid of her. sad about that. Oh, in the Stanford
band has once again been suspended.
These guys are just looking for ways to get out of rehearsal
right now. But you and I happen this time.
I don't know what they did. The extra was no specification. And
I have a final question for you. As the resident food and drink
expert, is it just me? No, it's not just me. But why has the
American cuisine decided that it's a good idea to put fried
eggs on everything? I'm seeing fried egg on pizza fried egg on
French fries, fried eggs on hamburgers, fried eggs
everywhere and not genuine. I like a dead fried egg no with
Yoky groupies. I mean who Yeah, what is this?
Fridays on hamburgers is old by the way that's been dates back
to the God knows when era in the Pacific Northwest is very common
to put a fried egg on a hamburger. I've noticed a few
more Fridays than usual when you see these guys in the cooking
shows up put a Friday against stuff that doesn't really want
to Friday going on it. And so the goo gets all over. You know,
he gets kind of romance bearnaise sauce is what it
is, but it's not advertising.
It's not happening in California that I know of.
Really, it's everywhere. Now. Now you have to know that. Tina,
the keeper has a I just call it an ovum phobia. She's not a big
egg lover.
No interesting.
And of course what's happened is
that she does she like bananas. Yes. But here's the thing she
like egg but eggplant.
Yes, she does. Okay, yeah, but but here's here's the sad thing.
So she you know, she she's like to Instagram a lot. All the all
the ladies like the Instagrams. And they'll show and she likes
look at and she likes baking. She's like looking at food
stuff. And then all of a sudden there will be a video of a photo
of an egg on a piece of food that you don't expect it.
A chocolate cake.
But here's the problem because she keeps stopping and looking
at it going oh god, why would you put an egg on that? The
algorithms going oh, us clearly one more. So she says he keeps
getting egg photos and videos on every piece of food is
completely disgusting.
Welcome to the new era. I
told you it wouldn't end well.
It's not ending well. Alright, John.
So well, we'll be back on Sunday and this will be Wow, this did
the show before the 888888 did. Indeed. Oh, man. All right.
Well, we'll see what's going to happen. We have our eyes on the
electoral college. Anything else taking place here?
Not really the Electoral College that will be the most
interesting, right?
Well, we will be watching for you ready to deconstruct
whatever comes across the transom. And I look forward to
our show. Until then, I would like to say that I'm coming to
you as usual from downtown Austin Tejas in the crackpot
condo, it's in the skyscraper. And that is the capital of the
drone Star State FEMA Region six on the map if you're looking for
it. In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam curry,
and from Northern Silicon Valley where Plato say man who
celebrate Hitler's birthday, have a bad hair day. John C.
Dvorak. We'll be back
on Sunday right here on no agenda.
The Russians for democracy in their mandatory reporting the
Russians hacked our democracy in our mandatory WMD in Iraq, which
the intelligence community now is one of the members who signed
that letter house and of course the Russian intelligence
community assurance was there and they weren't so let's not
ignore what Adam Schiff says we know exactly what is interesting
is that Russia and I'm quoting now hacked our search extremist
Russia, according to hacks are the party of Reagan in place
without the approval exness That could not interview on a
douchebag levels of the crumble, affiliation, institutions by
among other things, giving us it wasn't for sale. We've seen a
lot of speculation, emails that Russia and I'm pointing out
hacks are what I'm trying to tell you. In Iraq, intelligence,
in fact, it is people's personal emails for sure. Amen.
You have to figure out, what do we do from here and you're
right, we've got to get some jobs. From job. To job. To job,
to job, to job, to job, to job, to job, to job, to job, to job,
to job, to job, to job.
We must, we must, and we will. Be committed. We must, we must
and we will say be committed we must, we must and we will be
committed we must be we will be committed we marched behind I
don't know we might leave must have been about that we must be
more We will be committed
we've got to get the job
done we will we will 345678 I think we lost them there sell
some seeds Tommy alarming rise rising media star
it's this little something that's not right with me yet but
just give me a little more No No Keep going Keep going
up there goes to the Zephyr. No time is it
mopho.org/n A