No facts with Adam curry for August 6 2022 Episode number 85.
Fully Cuf recovered, ready to go to school once again, Adam curry
coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country and it is
time once again to spin the Wheel of topics from here to
Northern Virginia. Please say hello to my friend on the other
end, Mr. Moe facts?
How you know Adam,
much better thank you for asking, well, how are you?
I'm doing I'm doing great. Just ready to get this show in. I'm
glad to hear that you beat the coup for the second time.
Unbelievable man that was it's so debilitating. What a waste of
time this bio weapon they've unleashed on us.
Well, depends on how you look at it.
Well, that's true. That's a very good point. Hey, man, it's good
to hear your voice. I missed you. We don't talk enough. But
what we get is what I cherish because I'm ready. And you know,
you've been you've been taking me on an interesting journey, in
general, across all of my thinking and across all of my
shows with some of this, like the last episode, man with
eugenic stuff that's starting to have some kind of influence on
me most I want you to know, and I have a feeling it's by design.
I just pay attention to everything and you know, the
rest. And then I just kind of come here and share it. And I
think we kind of bulk about eugenics through the lens of Roe
v. Wade and current events that were going on. Yeah, but now we
gotta go back, you know, and you know, get back to it. So I guess
we need to spin the wheel.
All right, here we go spin the wheel of topics round and round.
It goes where it stops. Nobody knows except, well, Moe knows
because he put together another excellent episode for us the
topic for Moe facts with Adam curry episode 85.
Is Is there a relationship between race and mental
capacity?
Well, this is a key question when it comes to eugenics. I've
learned that.
Yes. So what we got to do is we got to take take a deeper look
at evolution, as well as genetics and social Darwinism
and their impact on race or how races are viewed. So. Okay, oh,
it's a continuation somewhat of the last show. Yeah, but we need
to get deeper into the ideology of Darwinism. Some some might
look at it as a religion.
Yeah, you know, the more I look at it, the more the more I
learn. And it seems like there's a whole bunch of stuff I missed
about Darwinism and Darwin, and all of these jokes.
It's might not be by accident, that really, there's some
masking going on, but I guess we can go ahead and get into
Darwin, Africa and genocide.
By the last decades of the 19th century, Darwin's theory was
increasingly popular among Germany's intellectual elite.
Darwin had claimed that humans and other mammals were the
product of what he called natural selection, a blind
struggle for existence, where the fittest survived and
reproduced, and the less fit died off. In his book The
Descent of Man, Darwin made clear that his idea of natural
selection had implications for human society.
Charles Darwin clearly was a social Darwinist, he was not as
rabid a social Darwinist as some of his followers later on. But
he clearly did believe that Darwinism should be applied to
human societies.
Darwin worried that civilized societies were harming humanity
by helping the poor, caring for the sick, and otherwise saving
those who nature would have killed off. Darwin feared that
such humanitarianism could eventually destroy the human
race.
Yes, pesky nature. pesky nature, Darwinism is actually the root
of eugenics the way I see it.
And I got some pushback. We'll get later to that, because
actually, people some people wrote in and push back against
it. So that's always good. Yeah, that ideas are being challenged.
But we have to lay it out and the dissent a man, this is a
quote, Darwin, Charles Darwin said, at some future period, not
very distant, as measured by centuries, the civilized races
of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace
throughout the world, the savage races, right?
It's right there. Black and white. I saw it too.
And it's a lot of science hinges on Darwinism, and this is why
they had to be carefully protected protective of him in
his image. Because when you pull that, you know, like one Jenga
break, the whole thing might fall down, right? This is why I
will say you might have experienced a masking going oh,
God, thank You said you don't remember the full title of the
book that we didn't know.
And in fact, a lot of people will give us the full title
again.
I don't have it right now. But it again,
I got it here somewhere. Hold on a second. Because yeah, that's
that's actually quite critical. Well, we had the, it was the the
Origin of Species, here we go.
I customize it, but I want to get it exactly right.
The Origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the
preservation of Favoured Races in the struggle for life. And
it's right there on wiki pedia big ass picture, a scan of the
of the original cover page.
Now, some might say we're looking too deep into the word
races, and it's more scientific. But when you couple that with
this statement from the Descent of Man, he's talking about
humans, and there being different levels or races or
however you want to sub genres or sub races, because he
distinguishes the civilized races from the savage races. So
I want to make sure we're we're being completely as we always
do, I'm biased and, you know, objective when we discuss these
topics, but right, as science hinges on this, a large part of
racism and the understanding of racism hinges on this same
ideology. No, no kids out of this come out of this kind of
manifest destiny and all the other things that oh, it's our
role to exterminate.
It's crazy. And even Dvorak, I said, Do you know the full
title? He said, No. He said, No. And when I told him, it's like,
Huh. Yeah,
wish that show you how well they masked to just chop off a whole
whole half of a title, which is very damning. When you cut, like
I said, when you couple that with other statements, so I
guess we can go ahead and get in, we're gonna jump to another.
That was let me just be clear that was from that's from
discovery science. It's not from some music by the music, you
might think it's from some YouTube video. But that was
actually from discovery science. And this now we're going to jump
over to this is, was Darwin a racist. And this is where Adam
Gopnik, let me just give you a little background on him. He's
from the New Yorker. And he wrote a book when we see the
name of the book, author of angels, angels and ages, a short
book about Darwin, Lincoln and modern life, which Lincoln and
Darwin a very tied together in the sense. As we talked about an
early episode, I forget which one it was how Lincoln's view
that America was a white nation that should be preserved for
white people. Yep. So all of this ties together. And it's I
find it interesting, interesting that he tied those two together
in his book, but I'm going to clip to be
cut to a particular chase here. Steve was something I thought we
talked about later, but since it came up now, and that is Darwin
and race you talked about and you had to sort of put onto the
mayor, you had to put it in, in quotes, the wild mele, the, the
Negro, because obviously, Darwin in thinking about race, spoke a
language had a vocabulary, which is no longer our vocabulary,
necessarily. It's a vocabulary of an earlier time. And yet one
of the most sensitive, tender, difficult, contentious issues in
Darwinism and understanding Darwin is, is Darwin's attitude
about race, because one of the things that comes up again, and
again, I'm sure you found this as I have in going around the
country with with this book is that the claim that Darwin
himself was inherently racist, is then extrapolated claim that
Darwinism itself is inherently racist, which is one of the
reasons why evolutionary biologists want to get out from
under Darwin. And it comes from two directions, it comes both
from the direction of the creationist right to, to dub it
that way. That is who wants to show that there's something anti
Universalist about Darwin, and it also comes from the left, who
wants to show that Darwinism doesn't lead by accident, to
social Darwinism to the belief in eugenics and into various
ugly kinds of 20th century racism, but that it leads
logically into though into into that kind of, of a into eugenics
and into the ugliest sides of 20th century history.
Oh man, another book have to add to my reading list.
So, a few points I want to point out in this clip one the
vocabulary of earlier time by right they they're still trying
to
Yeah, that's that's voicing it was like, Well, you know, the,
the Second Amendment they had muskets back in the day, you
mean something like that.
Also that when you're trying to be protective over an ideology
is based on a person. And they want to say they want to
separate Darwin from Darwinism. And his whole you know, saying
his whole all his studies his work, because modern science is
based deeply on that. And then you got to listen to the
enemies. He has enemies from the left and the right. His enemies
from the right or the creationist we want to get rid
of Darwin and his theory of creationism I mean, obviously we
evolution because it goes against the you know, the
biblical teachings or the creation or from from God from a
God, depending on what group you're talking about. And from
the left, they're saying Darwin, they get woke. They say we're
dogs are racist. And this is the root of racism, and they're both
right and away, but he just finds itself in a weird spot
right now.
Well, as I'm reading from the wiki pedia so the term Darwinism
actually came, was coined by Adolphus Huxley. Huxley, Huxley,
yeah, Huxley's Brave New World.
Yeah, okay. Yeah.
So it's interesting, because, yeah, they wanted to separate
Darwin from Darwinism, but it kind of it had already been
done. Or he didn't, he didn't really create it. Let me see.
Yeah, but in the castle culture. With the castle culture, if you
hit Darwin with the castle cannon, then bed theory go might
go down with it. And it's on shaky ground. Anyway, from my
standpoint, my bias standpoint, let me be very clear, me being a
believer that a higher being created me and all the human
race. It's a hard sell now to think that we crawled about a
slum. Of course, the more we understand about humans, right,
and the complexity of how of just the human body and
everything that will have to evolve from coming from one
organism, and let's be clear, that's a very unscientific take
on it. But I'm just telling you how is kind of fair through
popular science in pop culture. Sure. So I mean, so yeah, he's
on he's on very shaky ground. So they have to be very protective,
over Mr. Charles Darwin, when you start peeling and pulling
back the layers, it's like, oh, where this where that racist
idea comes from or stems from or could have been weaponized. I
mean, let's just be you know, we always like to humanize people.
In some cases, it might be people that are actually just
using and weaponizing his ideas to push a certain narrative.
Absolutely. Then this, and this is so obvious, but so
undiscussed I'm so happy we're doing this.
Yeah, they don't want to really No, good reason. Cuz, once
again, if you get those left and right enemies to find some
common ground, he really could be taking out a commission
right. So, I guess we can get into to see now, but,
but the first part of it, I do think is a falsehood in in plain
English, that is to say that if you look at what Darwin actually
says about the question of race, and most notably or notoriously,
depending on your point of view, in the Descent of Man, he toyed
with the idea of race that is he takes he takes seriously the
idea that the races of man might be separate in the way that the
the species might first so that subspecies of of of any creature
might be and he toyed with that idea and he plays with it and if
you take out those sections have have descended man you can you
can find in some sense incriminating passages, but
having played with it and having toured with the keyword Jackson,
he rejects
Stop Stop, stop. Okay, so you hear this this this honesty up
let's go back to the quote. He this is the thing he toys with
it, you know? This is bedrock. So on future period, not very
distant, as measured in centuries, the civilized races
of man will also most will almost certainly exterminate,
and replace throughout the world, the savage races, I don't
know how he defines toys with what this is pretty much and
raises as you can get.
Let's roll that back a little bit here, a second
of any creature might be, and he toys with that idea that he
plays with it. And if you take out those sections,
go back a little further. And it's better here toys
with the idea of race that is he takes he takes seriously the
idea that the races of men might be separate in the way that the,
the species might first so that subspecies of, of, of any
creature might be, and he toys with that idea. And he plays
with it. And if you take out those sections of of Descent of
Man, you can you can find, in some sense, incriminating
passages.
Only if you really study it very closely, don't read the words as
a whole or anything.
Yeah, if you take them on face value, he means it's terminate,
um, you, you can squint and see it, but
it's really hard to see really hard but
having played with it, and having toured with the keyword
Jackson, he rejects it quite explicitly, he rejects it on two
grounds when he rejects it on the ground, it seems to me at
least, that there's no evidence for it. That is to say that, as
far as you can tell, by any rational standard, all human
beings belong to a single race, they made to breed they have all
the characteristics of a race, they all have essentially the
same mental powers, and they all have essentially the same
abilities. He also believed that, that the key human
capacity, the human key human gift, is sympathy. And he and he
talks about that a great deal. He says sympathy is probably
evolved for some useful social reason, because it enables a
group of HomoSapiens to have a competitive advantage over some
other group, they're used to working together, they they like
each other, they get engaged. But then he says very
beautifully. But once you have simply there's nothing to limit
your application of it. There's nothing that prevents you from
expanding it as you like, to whatever social group you choose
to.
The sympathy thing. Yeah. And the way I see that translating
into modern thought, and this is why I say the left can be more
racist than the right because on the right, the people that
subscribe to this ideology to say, oh, yeah, you're black. You
know, you black people are dumber, or whatever. They
honestly believe that. And I can respect their honesty at least
even though they're incorrect. Well, I can respect their
honesty. But the way the left comes at it is, yeah, we're no,
you're dumb. But we have sympathy for you know, that's
why we need to have these and then fill in the blank all these
special programs to level the playing field. Because they
think is nature. This is not my believe it is nurture.
That's really deeply ingrained what you just said they're very,
very, very much so. So that's that's the that's kind of the
root of it. Interesting.
Yeah. This is math is racist. These days. Right? Right. Oh,
man. They're so dumb, we need to have more than one right answer
to two plus two. So that's what that's what they lobby for. I
don't know if they're conscious of it. I would assume so. at
some levels. I mean, of course, people get indoctrinated into
beliefs. But okay.
I'm just Do you remember? Do you know what this is interesting?
Do you remember the story I told this one is was one of our oshit
moments, the story about the black family that visited us and
I was like six years old, and we were in, in Maryland. And they
were all dressed up he the boy in a suit and the girl and a
little frock and everything. And, you know, it seemed way
overdressed for the occasion. And they were kind of timid. And
I told you that, you know, well, I think we discovered that we
were both like fucked up by our parents about what was coming.
And they had told us how to behave. And it was just, it made
no sense for a bunch of kids, right. But I remember
specifically, looking at them. This is very weird to say, and
feeling sorry. And I can't explain why. But I remember that
feeling. And I didn't understand it. And now, it seems like that
was something that was inherently kind of baked into
the culture that I was raised in. Not that I don't think any
of my family are racist, but that fee Feeling right there. I
remember that.
That's the dangers of lower expectations of vicked embracing
and victimization mentality
I was, I was six Mo, I was six. That was early on
this, this system is ingrained in the images that we see
through the media, the television roles that we see the
movies like, like it's always some white savior coming to the
poor school to save
my mind you this was 1969 Okay, so um, just to give you some
context as to what the world was like, right back then. So and I
don't think I got this from my parents per se, but from media,
television, everything that I that I was exposed to at this
time.
Right. And this is the problem with the actual this take a
little sidebar, I quit this is that was
that was kind of hard for me to admit, by the way. That was that
was fucked up. How did I Well, that's
just just to have another honest moment without closing the door.
I mean, is that on the other side? Preparing for the show
word, whatever. It's a it's a, it's not a huge thought. But it
is a thought to say, oh, I need to pronounce this right. Because
I can be discredited. At any moment. Yeah, sure. Sure. I
feel Yeah, I feel that kind
of thing. And I'm gonna go ahead and open we'll go and do a quick
review. This is that different thing once people get to know
you, they all your different. Different from what Yeah. You
see,
like, most most not your typical black guy.
Right. Exactly. all He's different. He's people that
badass them battling the images that were created. And I believe
it systems to systemically done to maintain this system of white
supremacy and you're hearing it through Adam Gopnik? Yeah, we
have to protect Darwin, even though we have his words right
now. No, no, you don't understand. And that's the other
thing that I always say, when people say, Oh, you just don't
understand. Oh, it's like, I think I understand quite
clearly. So about affirmative action, I'm gonna say right,
quick, this is the issue, when you say that we can perform less
and get in. This only feeds that narrative, that narrative,
because I experienced it when you work in corporate America.
It's like, Oh, how'd you get here, you know, kind of thing.
And it's a whole thing with imposter syndrome. We'll go down
that rabbit hole another day. But yeah, this is now your store
CV? I'm glad you admitted that, because that just speaks to, and
I'm glad I admitted what I said. Yes. The speaks to the is the
Well, the difference is I felt that when I was six, you felt
that maybe this week.
Right? But it's you feel it when it's not because I feel it is
because how I could be perceived. And that goes back to
the double consciousness of a negro that I can see. I know how
I feel about it, but I know how others can feel about how I feel
about it. I mean, it's it's, it's a huge calculation going
on. But let's go ahead and jump on.
Tiring mo this tiring. Like I got to always think about and by
the way, I don't know if you have to, but you do. So you feel
like you have to always think about that. Because XYZ you'll
be perceived and maybe you won't, but but that doesn't
matter. You feel like you have to do that. It's not
that I feel like it's that's what I say it's not a persistent
thought. It crosses your mind and then you had to stamp it
out. Like you know, I'm sure of what I'm doing. I know what I'm
doing here and that but that constant battle. It just has a
rodeo
old programming. Really Alright, embedded programming.
Okay, man. Now just just to make one more thing since we're here
at this point. Now imagine you just say how tiring is now
imagine liberal thinking people. They live in that space. Oh,
no wonder they're hysterical. Crazy. No wonder
drives you crazy on both sides. One. If you actually think you
live in that, or if you perceive this will be white liberals
perceiving black people living in that space.
I gotta, I gotta tell you another story. This is my
stepdaughter, the younger one. And now she's come around a lot.
She's been living in New York for goodness, almost two years.
And she's come around a lot. And I'm very, very proud of her. But
we were she was Visiting a year and a half ago, maybe here in
the hill country. And we were at our one of our favorite
restaurants. And I know all the all the waitstaff there. And
this is one, one server black guy, and he was interesting. He
had his baseball cap on and he had kind of those the small
dreads. And then I said, Holy crap, man, it looks just like
Snoop Dogg, which he did. He looks like it all it was missing
was, you know, the, the wraparound sunglasses data, data
data. I mean, it was totally right. And she got up and left
the restaurant because she believed 100% that I was just
being completely racist, saying there's a black guy must be
Snoop Dogg. And I and I acknowledge
Him there have familiar appearances, when he heard and
this is what this is the thing about being what's being said,
and what's being heard. And this is gonna be I'm glad you brought
that up. Because that's gonna be a sub sub running theme of this
show. Are we saying that black people are dumb, all black
people? Are we saying they're a higher percentage of dumb people
in the black? Race? He's gonna say it like what you're saying.
Now, you said they look like was she? I'm not putting words in my
mouth. But it leads to that all black people look alike to you,
dad.
It was really bizarre. But I guess what I was saying was that
she has these props or had had, it's really changed. I'm so
proud of her. She had these processes running all the time.
Oh, every day always like trolling. Is there something
racist? Is it something racist, something racism, but then the
reason why that process is running is perhaps something
much differently. It's actually a misplaced compassion. It's
really weird. Sympathy, sympathy. Right? Exactly. Yeah,
that's the that sympathy that we speak of. It's like I say, it's
very tiring. And I think that's the great part of the show that
you can kind of take some of that baggage off on both sides,
and like kind of like, Hey, this is what this is what I see this
what you see, and we talk about it, and it can be put to rest.
And then you know, the producers get to hear that as well. Yeah,
well, we,
we saw this one
onward. Right. Now we're gonna get into the genocide, the
horror of scientific racism.
Darwin also predicted that in the future, the civilized races
of mankind would exterminate the inferior ones. Darwin himself
was ambivalent about some of the social implications of his
theory. But in Germany, Darwin's ideas supplied a new generation
of political leaders, social thinkers, and scientists with
what they regarded as a biological justification for
world domination.
If you read the scientists of the day, in the late 19th, and
early 20th century, many of them were promoting racism and even
racial extermination extinction of races. They were promoting
the gaining of living space, they were promoting competition,
the things that we know of is social Darwinism. These were
things being promoted by Charles Darwin himself to some degree.
Many other leading biologists
know you don't say
the one word I want to focus on this whole clip is Exterminate.
Because that's that's an interesting word to use. Yeah,
more commonly used with bugs or paths. Yeah, bugs. Yeah, right
and just from the wetlands. Merriam Webster is means to
destroy completely. And similar words, let's see I had similar
words here. Okay to similar words is abolish, annihilate
blackout, blot out Council clean up. Eradicate, erase, expand,
liquidate, obliterate root out, rub out, snuff out, stamp out,
sweep away and wipe out. Yeah.
Sounds groovy all of it.
But he just toyed with he only only just a
little toying around. It was really was just just juvenile
stuff.
But just in fairness, people took the the idea and this is
how dangerous ideas can be. When they're weaponized. The Germans
they took it and ran with it. Um, you you want to say before
we move on? Well,
I should say that the Germans they took it from the Americans
they were Hitler in particular was a big fan of some of the
American eugenicist, wrote them fan letters even. And then when
when Germany started going a little hard and heavy, like you
know, in the US people were talking about forced
sterilization in Germany was like, hey, you know what, I
think gas chambers are good. That's when everyone got really
quiet here. The Genesis the eugenics movement,
right? Because they had to distance themselves. Yeah, that
was that we'd already
had that conversation America and was like Nana, that's kind
of lame. Let's not do that.
Well, but not out of any sane, benevolent, you know, feeling.
You're gonna you're gonna blow this scheme right here keep
doing this on bra Street. Yeah. So once again, is that, oh,
we're helping you by sterilizing you, we're helping you by
eugenics kind of thing that sympathy. They actually think
they're doing the right thing. And we have to be clear, these
people are lizards. And thinking with the lizard brain, they're
thinking, if we let the savage races continue to procreate,
there won't be any space for us. So it's either fight or flight.
And I want people to see that through this lens. If only to
understand to counteract it, you know, these people are acting
out of fear. It's not power, they act out of fear.
Well, no, they've acted out of fear. And through that they've
created huge power structures based on that fear, which in my
mind, I'm seeing it so much clearer now is in fact, the
pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, and you got the
bankers running around, taking advantage of it, the whole
system of institutions, kind of feels like it's set up to make
to remove people from the planet. Slowly. And it's not one
race. It's it's everybody slowly.
Yeah, they have different criteria. And that's the thing
and, um, but but they know who needs to go first. Like I said,
We'd always come to a nice, Savage Race thing. We got to get
them out of the way first, and then we'll once we get that down
to 10%, then we will do the 10% of the 10% It won't stop. I
mean, they're always continuously improving. So
that's the thing I would never start with these people until
there's only a handful of quote unquote Gods on the earth
500 million 500 million Georgia Guidestones. That's that's their
that's their their guiding light.
And I don't think it will stop there. I just think that's the
first 10% Okay, now we got down to 500 million. Sure. Now, it
needs to be 50 million, you know, and they'll continue on
with their process. Let's see, we stopped there for two Yeah,
okay, let's go there.
The war of annihilation is a natural law, without which the
organic world could not continue to exist at all. Germans who
ologists Gustave agar ating 70. Just as in nature, the struggle
for existence is the moving principle of evolution and
perfection. So also in world history, the destruction of the
weaker nations through the stronger is a postulate of
progress. German ethnologist, Friedrich Hal veiled, 1875,
according to Darwin's theory, wars have always been of the
greatest importance for the general progress of the human
species. The physically weaker, the less intelligent, the
morally lower, must give place to the stronger German
biologist, Heinrich Ziegler, at 93.
Yeah, they were all over that.
Yeah, so I missed that setup. But that's yes, quotes for
scientists that Darwinism influenced. And you can see they
just took it to another level. And that you hear him start
speaking about intelligence and moral composition as being
criteria for for eliminating people. So but there is some
down sod eugenics in their eyes, even in the leaders eyes there
because it can, you know, well, let's go and get number five.
Not all German Darwinists defended war as a biological
imperative. Some, in fact criticized it for undermining
natural selection. They feared that wars in Europe would kill
off too many of the superior races. Yet even these pacifist
Darwinists tended to approve of wars raged against races they
considered lower on the evolutionary scale like the
native peoples of Africa
yeah door or brown people in deserts we still do that.
Right or brown people in you know, south of the border or
wherever I mean, like, but you heard him say it well, we kill
them out too many around, you know, these world wars or
whatnot?
Yes, no good. Yeah, we got to keep some of our own people
going.
Right, because you it's the balance there, that you have to
increase the civil civilized races while suppressing the
numbers of the savage races. But when you have these world wards,
it kind of has an ill effect on the civilized races as well. I'm
gonna take this as a quick aside and just say what I'm seeing in
the world right now. And I just had an epiphany. I was talking
to girl one one day, and you know, we just go go back and
forth. And it was just like it had no, it just popped in my
head. Are we and I say we, the Western ideology, white
supremacy. Because I live in America. So I'm part of that
loading up on soldiers. Because I keep hearing this mean,
military aged men coming across the border. Military age men
coming across the border, military age men flooding into
Europe. Oh, oh, we know, because I pay my taxes to the United
States government. Are we loading up on soldiers that we
sorely miss? Hmm.
I don't know that. That's an interesting thought.
Like you like that citizenship. You like living in the country?
Yeah. Well, there
is a path for if you come in illegally, there's a path for
you to go to military and to become a citizen. I believe that
still exists.
Exactly. And we saw this same thing. We saw mass emigration
from Europe. Then we saw two world wars. Yes,
that's right. That continues that continues to this day here
and in Europe.
Right. So I just want people to pay attention. Like why? Yeah.
And the term military age mean military age. And now that could
be double used as to scare people.
Yeah. Oh, potential terrorists or something of that nature.
Right. But also in my book, it could be the old like,
foreshadowing like, Oh, we got soldiers right here. How
convenient, you know, to protect Europe. And would they fight
that? I mean, that's, that's the question. But that's, like I
said, that's another story for another day when I when I saw
that I was like, and it kind of rolled I was like home. You have
all these extra guys around. And you see what's happening on the
global front. I mean, with China, Russia and whatever else.
Are these bodies for the military? Because I don't want
to go too far down that rabbit hole. But this is how
sophisticated is one world system is
very possible. No. I don't see any evidence of it yet.
Yeah, we'll have to put like I say, I just want to lay this
when I have these thoughts. It just too convenient. Don't Don't
be a Neely. Fuller say don't be confused. They're confused.
Right? Open. Yeah. That's for
sure. There's this another shooter dropped with that one.
But with that said, I think that was number five. Now we're gonna
jump on over. This is a dangerous. This is Lipsy. Yeah,
I got it. This is a documentary is called a dangerous idea, the
history of Eugenics in America. And this is from the National
Constitution Center. And let's go on and get into Part One of
it.
My interest in eugenics certainly comes in part, from
the experience of myself being a refugee from from Hitler, and
being keenly aware of what was done in the name of science and
specifically in the name of genetics. But that happened in
this country as well, of course, in a certain sense, the Nazis
imported from the United States which had a flourishing eugenics
movement.
At the turn of the 20th century, eugenics was widely accepted in
the United States as solid science among the country's top
psychologists, scientists, politicians and social thinkers.
During this first Gilded Age, it was the creation of the gene
concept itself that ignited what became a powerful eugenics
movement.
So one reason that the eugenics movement was so influential at
the time was because it provided a scientific solution or a
supposedly scientific so solution to a political problem.
No science.
Yes. Believe in the Science Trust the science, it's okay.
It's just science
is the scientific solution. I love it to a political problem.
And it doesn't stop. I mean, we see that even to this day. Eat
bugs, that's a scientific solution. Yes, it is to a
political problem of homelessness. I mean, in this is
just how they use their religion or science to justify actions
that will be seen as counter to being human. You know, just the
human sense of like, you can't kill off people. I mean, you
can't put people in gas chambers. You can't sterilize
people. You can't give people blankets with smallpox. And, you
know, you can't release a bio weapon. amongst the masses. You
can't release an untested vaccine and witness the masses
isn't Oh, what is the scientific solution to a political problem?
Yeah, it's justified. So isn't that the American Nazis man,
like airtime? Like people want to say, oh, and it's convenient.
And we'll see a little later and show how so maybe?
Have You Ever Have you ever watched Man in the High Castle?
I have not. I've heard you talk about I've heard a couple other
people talk about it. But
yeah, it's it's not about race, but completely about eugenics.
Eugenics, it really is a lot of the shows about eugenics. And
you know, they've got, I mean, the whole premise of the show
is, is interesting. And I'm like, in season three, but it's
just something if people want to see how it could have turned out
after World War Two, that's something it'd be interesting to
watch that. It's what
it finished that statement, how it could have turned out
if war if America had not won, if the Germans and the Japanese
had beat America? I think they did. And that's kind of the
point of Man in the High Castle. When you look at it, you're
like, wait a minute, did anything did this not happen?
Yeah. You're so right.
If it started here, then it's not really not seeing an origin.
No. I mean, you look at Henry Ford, and you know, you know,
the people you know, of that ilk. Lindbergh how they put me
in Rockefeller and all these people. I mean, they were big
time, you know, saying eugenics. And so we have to look at the
who actually went now Germany might have lost a war as a
country, but the ideology? Yeah, I mean, you look at the
Operation
Paperclip, they bought or brought over hundreds of Nazis.
Right.
And Nazi NASA. I mean, it ain't too many letters, all from each
other. So, and I like to put some respect on one of the
people that opened my eyes up to this possibility. That's my
Brussels or may Brussels. Have you ever heard of her before?
No, I have not. You've never heard her maiden name. Super.
She's like this super OG truther. That oftentimes you
don't hear women truthers, and I use that term very loosely. But
people that aspire to finally seek the truth. Not in the
pejorative term of truth here but
never heard. She was a radio host. Well,
she started out by investigating the JFK. Right. I'm looking at
her Wikipedia right now. Right. That's what got her into it. And
from there, she found this whole night. Not the kind of self
system in the United States government. And she was like,
Oh, gee, dang, like podcasts. She was pre podcast. So he's
like, she had to mail you tapes. You know, this is how she we had
to get I mean, so just to give person respect her name, but
this is what opened my eyes to like, hold on, like,
shoot, man. I'd never heard of her. How fascinating. And she's
like, she shouldn't be my OG conspiracy therapist. Well,
she's dead.
Yeah, but if you go back, you can find it. I mean, it's
getting harder to find her stuff. But interestingly, you
she was sent out and break it now. Like, Oh, this guy came
over here. And you know, he was no like, connecting the orange
string. And so you know, and it just kind of opened my eyes
like, I don't own various Well, I haven't seen a man in the High
Castle. But this predate my my belief. I guess I've been down
many rabbit holes when I went down that when I was like, huh,
and a TAS of Jim Jones, and that's kind of how I got into
her, because she's the one that did a lot of investigation on
Jim Jones. See? And that whole thing that went down there were
so um, yeah. So American Nazis we had to really look at this
and see that the a lot of that ideology started here went over
there got perfected and then they brought the player right
back back here and we're like, sheesh, I know if you noticed
that all the movies like The evil professors or doctors have
like German names. Yes. Oh, yeah, so I guess we can go and
move on to the next clip number nine.
The wealthiest families in the country provided millions and
research funding to scientists, in an attempt to prove that
social problems were primarily a result of defective genetics. At
the prestigious Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York,
Harry Laughlin, and animal breeder, directed the eugenics
record office, he claimed they could predict who would inherit
good or bad traits by using a mathematical formula from
Mendel. They were also firm believers in Charles Darwin, who
clearly applied his theory of natural selection to human
society. You Genesis saw themselves as agents of
evolution, doing their duty to ensure that the fittest
Americans survived.
They said, We have to find a way to have people who are more
evolved, make more babies, we have to find a way to have
people who were poor, and have all these diseases and all this
bad genetic structure produce less.
Laughlin organized exhibits in communities across the country
to educate the public about eugenics. Families underwent
detailed physical and mental examinations as they competed to
win the prize for the best heredity.
Yes, yes. I've read about this at family fairs that have tests
and so the like town fairs,
right, they'll test your blood. Oh,
you know, the IQ the IQ test, as we know it today is a derivative
of all this bullshit.
Goggles curry. I knew. I knew I couldn't get through one show.
I'm sorry. This contract? I'm sorry. I did. I did some jumping
ahead. I'm sorry. I did some research a couple of weeks ago.
Yeah. So this Genex you heard it right there. Yes. The root of
this Genex that
and discharges Gen X to remind everybody this Gen X is where if
you don't do anything, then the dumb stupid people will breed
much faster and take over the world. And it basically,
Idiocracy is what we then get.
Right? Oh, and they'll eat up all the resources and you have
more takers than givers. Right Saudi in that and you know, in
society could collapse under that way. Right. So the agents
of evolution have become savers from the from the from the dumb
people. Um, that's, that is a bold statement. Now, on the
backside of this clip, this is where we're gonna refresh
people. This is a merging of two clips from the last show of I
think it was William Shockley.
Oh, yeah. Shockley. Yeah, the transistor guy.
Yeah, cuz he's the one that brought, you know, the modern
term dis Genex. And but you heard it is the idea that less
dumb people more smart people. That comes out of, you know, og
eugenics?
Yeah, I found that I found an interview of William Shockley
from the early 70s. With William F. Buckley, Jr. Which apparently
was, according to the Vortech was, was the interview that kind
of made the public go, You're not You're an idiot. But it was
unbelievable. What he was talking about. He was dead
serious about this stuff.
And the question is, Is he is he an idiot? No answer that
question yet. Let's listen to what he says so people can hear
what he said. And let's talk about on the other side.
Now, let's find out what the controversy is about Dr.
Shockley, please give us the benefit, basically, of what your
theory is.
My principal point, Mr. Brown is not so much a theory of black
white differences. But it's summed up in one word which the
theme of my appearance on your program and my efforts, and the
word is dis Genex. And dis Genex means effectively down breeding,
retrogressive evolution. And I fear that this is worst for the
black community. And I particularly welcome an
opportunity to appear on Black Journal just for these reasons.
But now let me say this chart that I held up a moment ago, is
very important in respect to this question of why I think
There may be what proves the basic difference. But I'm going
to say that if there were not a basic difference and
intellectual capacity in the past, there probably will be a
basic difference between black and white intellectual capacity
in the future, simply because of the reproduction patterns.
When I say Idiocracy, I'm referring to the movie. Right? I
know what you mean. Because because that's basically what
happens in Idiocracy. Is all the idiots multiplied. Well, that's
right.
It's the pace thing is because it's not only do you have to
stop the dome, you have to influence the intelligent to
breed. And they're having a harder time with that and might
get sad a little later, but it ties into older show as well.
But let me ask you a question. And then we're going to take a
look at things through the lizard lens. Okay. And you see
how, see how the lizard see you? Okay, the question is, what
percentage of people are fit to be parents in America?
What percentage of people are fit to be
procreate?
Well, I guess, to have to defy, define fit? I mean, physically
able,
or let me use your definition that you say, oh, that's the
ideal person to be a parent there.
Is feels like a trick question.
It's really not, I'm just my number is probably lower.
Well, see, I Well, first of all, I believe that everybody who has
who has a functioning human being is technically fit to be
parents. I'd say the problem is we have a large population who
has grown up askew, so mainly without a father or man in the
house. So I'll put the I'll have to put it at 25%, then.
Okay, so you're saying 75%? I knew my nobilo are yours minus
20? Yeah, that's about one out of every five people I
encounter. I'll be like, You know what, we need more of them
in the world. And what reason why I'm doing this we had, we
have to look at this through the lizard lens. When they ask that
ask themselves that question. Instead, say, Okay, we're
looking at the society. Let's just use your number one out of
every four people are fit to be parents. Okay. What do we do
with the three out of four?
sterilize them,
shoot them to Mars, get rid of them? Right? starve them, get
them out of universal basic income? Right, tricking them
into giving up their fertility in some kind of way. Scare them
through global warming and their impact on the planet. You know
what, we have to take action? Because we can't, we're using
your percentage. And they're in their thought process to say,
Okay, we can't let three out of four procreate? No. So what do
we do? We castrate them? Either, you know, the whole track child
trans movement?
Oh, yeah, that's, that's I completely agree. That's
sterilization of weak brothers and sisters who? Who accepted
this dumb programming in the first place?
And it's not the child? No, it's the parent is like, the ones
pushing it exactly. Right, which they look at and say, Hold on,
if those two people create it, and allow this to happen to
their child, they don't need any more children.
With you that this is the thinking mode. I've thought this
ever since we started going down this rabbit hole. That's why I
keep coming up with
and just fast forward that to every scenario that's in the
news of NES, how you look at is like three out of four, you
know, they say they have, you know, three out of five, or
whatever the number is, I mean, the other the remainder, we have
to take action, we can't be inactive. And as we tried to
educate them, we gave them the internet. We gave them the
information age, we gave them billions of dollars, trillions
of dollars in free money for education. And this is what we
got for our investment. Of course, I'm speaking from the
lizard perspective. But this is what we got for our investment
we gave you you know, interesting, the world's
library. We gave you abilities to learn and do anything
possible. Right? And you want to play Angry Birds and candy crush
all day. Yeah, you gotta go. Yeah. And I asked, the reason
why I do this is just to humanize not even to defend
them, but to say okay, if you see that as your enemy or you're
a combatant You have to seek first to understand, you have to
understand their mentality of if you're not value added to
society, you have to go and it's very cold and callous. But I
believe that's their standpoint.
I think you're right. I think you're right at a high level and
and it's a small group of people who drive it, but it's so
ingrained in our culture that's knit everything
you notice everybody has to my dumber than them. If you ever
noticed that, you know, I look at that dummy, you know, that
kind of thing, we have a look downward kind of mentality. So
we don't care about what happens to people under, you know, um,
and that plays right into the losers hand as well. So I guess
let's go ahead and move to the third part of this clip, number
10.
But you Genesis disagreed on what should be done with people
they considered
unfit.
Some argue that less a fair economic policies might be
severe enough to eliminate so called defectives from the gene
pool.
society should not coddle in any way, the poor, don't help them.
Don't help them through charity. Don't help them through
legislation that you see if you help them according to the
social Darwinists, you would only enable them to reproduce
more of them, society would be better off if we instituted
survival of the fittest, we would get stronger just as
species become stronger when their weakest members die off
and their strongest members live on to
reproduce.
But it would take decades before this social Darwinian approach
would be effective. So many new Genesis considered a quicker
solution, one that would eventually be used by the Nazis,
euthanasia. Some called for outright execution of the unfit,
as well as lethal neglect of newborns they considered
defective.
But in the end, they agreed that euthanasia would be used at two
deer a moral price. Sterilization was the favorite
alternative. Biologist Harry Laughlin wrote the Model law
that North Carolina eventually used to sterilize Elaine
Riddick.
Okay, we have a famous case here.
Yes. So as you spoke and said that euthanasia we can't do that
it is bad for business. So what can we do? Well, they already
here. So we just got to stop them from procreating and enter
sterilization and the legalization of sterilization.
But you heard they ask the question. So what should be done
with the unfit? Yeah. Which, if we're honest, be completely
honest. Some people who may not be the best people to procreate?
But on the other hand, that's a slippery slope, because then who
starts to set the standard?
No, that's always going to be the slippery slope. Of course.
That's why you can't even though I understand the letters I get
it, is, you can't start that. Because if you start that, then
how do you stop it? You know, where does it go from? Okay,
we'll do the people when they start not cute. And then becomes
Oh, well, well, I'm not financially ready.
Oh, silly. I'll say it. But it seems obvious to me what they
did. Let's systematically kill them with with processed food.
Now, it kills everybody except the people in the know. I think
that that's the that's the path they chose to like, Okay, we're
gonna have all kinds of different quality food which
most people will not eat, that'll make them weak. It's
possible that certain viruses etc, were introduced.
Looking at the viruses and who they attack and who there is,
you know, if you're, if you're married in a monogamous
relationship, monkey pox is not a real threat to you. A's wasn't
a real threat to you. Other than like, blank blood transfusions
or something crazy like that, but look at the diseases look at
their behaviors when it came to how they did the old people in
rest homes, bringing, you know, Cuf patients in there that was
that was my best one. Yeah, no, that was obvious that that was a
kill shot
of the own fat. Yeah. You know, and they're just gonna keep
ratcheting it down. And now it's
That's the beautiful thing is you get a population, which in
the United States, I think some crazy number like 46% of all
Americans are obese Friday 46%. So, you know, and notice what we
didn't get with. With two years of poof, we didn't get anyone
saying, here's some things you can do to strengthen your immune
system. Here's some very simple things you can take. Here's some
simple exercises, you could none of that. Because jails were
closed. Yes, he was only physical health the churches
were closed. So mental health is like everything was was geared
up to have the weakest die off.
You locked me in my house? Only fast food is essential. Yeah,
use it use the wet, don't be confused. They're confused when
you start to look at these things. And like actually, yeah,
they started to crystallize is like, holy crap, I'm with you.
They are legit trying to take us I when I say us, the general
population. Now if you have willpower, they say Oh, you'll
be fine Mo, or you'll be fine out, um, you know, to eat or,
you know, to exercise or? Well, I mean, whatever it is.
You live in Europe, you don't need heating this winter, you
don't have any air conditioning, you'll be okay. Just turned out
just take shorter showers.
Right waves, it is bizarre, that they're actually in favor of the
people they demonize, right. Cuz like, if you look at it
conservative, quote, unquote, textbook, conservative family,
the ones that are prepping and, you know, having children in a
planned way, you know, we had to go back to that this plan, the
ones who are doing the Planned Parenthood method of planning
out, you know, procreation. That's who we won't, and they're
not going to fall for our tricks, you know, and they're,
and there'll be fine. Just not saying anything, while we
eradicate the old dumb and the sad. Yeah, it's true. It's very
sick.
I mean, sick, but it's so obvious.
It's very obvious. And now you have to go back and say, who
actually won that war and audiology was not military or
military wise or whatever else? And you have to say, Well, if we
taught them and we mean, we beat them either way, we would have
one that's playing books. That's playing both sides of the war.
And it's the same enemies. It's now it's the same, it's the same
enemies. True, as now because my little Germany's on Sr. Japan's
on our side, how convenient. And now we're battling Russia. Wow.
I'm 11.
In 1927, the Supreme Court upheld Harry lofrans Model law
and ruled eight to one that the Constitution permitted US
citizens to be forcibly sterilized. Congress never
passed a federal sterilization law. But it's estimated that by
the end of World War Two under state laws, at least 80,000
Americans had been forced to undergo hysterectomy, Tubal
ligation, vasectomies and castration.
There was only in 1933, after the Nazis took over the Germany
had any eugenic laws at all. The first law they passed was for
the heredity of future generations. And that was their
sterilization law. And they modeled it on Lofland Model law.
In fact, they were so grateful to Loughlin for his leadership
in this area that they gave him an honorary medical degree from
Heidelberg in 1936. For research on purifying the germ plasm
other human population.
Laughlin was an enthusiastic supporter of the third rash, the
eugenics news, which Lofland edited trust fond over Germany,
and its progressive policies. And in fact, there was a certain
envy Germany's getting too far ahead of us in applying the
conclusions of science to the structure of society.
Now there's something we have to consider with this. Intuitively
a you and I are on the same page, but has there ever been a
Have they ever played out the theory all the way through? Have
they ever looked at a microcosm of a community or country and
said, Okay, let's not kill any of these people? Let's see what
happens. Let's see if if indeed dis Genex happens. Is there any
example of that? Or is it just as a given and we're just all in
this just sheer numbers. Like you'd like we just did the
study. It was like the unofficial study of if one out
of every four people are all three out Every four people are
unfit to procreate. They gotta go. We can't run that risk. They
got to overrun us.
Well, and as, and can we, as Adam and Mo, can we run that
risk that we have a bunch of blithering idiots running
around? Is it mean
that we had to take a real look at this and say, what the
problem is? Is there some solutions that are still
humanizing and honest to say to people, Hey, this is what's
gonna happen. This is what we think this is why I said, this
is why respect the people that are honest to say, Hey, this is
why I think I think you're an idiot. How much would it take
for you to give up your facility? Right? Yeah. And
right, that a person that, at least me, well, at least they
know what they're getting into,
that was shock, Lee's entire idea. Shockley was talked about
the sterilization bonus. And he wanted to be a federal
government program that you would receive, he had, he had
the numbers broken down, depending on what type of what
you did. But if you if you got a vasectomy, or if you were
sterilized, then they would put $30,000 into an escrow account
for you. And you know, that would actually take care of your
living and compound interest. Of course, this was the 70. So it's
a different interest to scenario. And that would base it
was like universal base. There you go. Universal Basic Income,
if you get goggles, goggles, goggles. Okay, all right. I got
there. I got there. All right.
Are you willing to give up your because if you're on the
government's team, you can't be having babies?
Well, right now, it's, of course, the opposite is true is
you know, the the government gives you lots of money for your
babies, which is part of the welfare issue.
Right, but they say I will give you whatever a mother forget
not to have children not to have children, but a bonanza. Great
idea.
And that's why I see it coming. Because it's kind of like one of
those situations with every employee needs 15 All the hour,
right? That was the, yeah, let's do this. So we can justify
automation and put them out of a job. Right? It's the same thing
with UBI. It's like, Oh, you want to stay at home and find
your true self and meaning in the world.
Now, I mean, think about the beautiful scenario, if you have
people on UBI, you have a central bank, digital currency,
so you control where they can spend, you can really control
the economy in a very fine tuned way, you can make sure that if
you believe in monetary, modern monetary theory that you can
keep printing money forever, which clearly the central banks
do, then you can you know, then you have your built in
consumers. And you can determine who is successful by steering
the consumers based upon access they can or cannot have with the
money that you control. Oh, this is kind of a dynamite plan. Now
to think about it.
And this is 2.0. Because this is what welfare was about the first
time around, right? And no man in the house, it was, Okay, keep
the seed spreader away. And we'll give you the apartments
were nice when they first build built, you know, they weren't
projects right off the bat, it was okay, we'll give you a nice
apartment. And we'll give you food stamps, which is basically
the same thing. You we give you money, that you're limited how
you can spend it. So what you're saying with the, you know, the
digital currency, so I mean, you can't you can't buy this, you
can't buy hot food, you're the Cabal, you know, saying blah,
blah, anything, if they really want to help your society, they
can make it where your food stamps, or EBT card will only
work for healthy food. But it's the complete opposite. Well,
even though some of that they tried to implement but you know,
the, the black market for for selling and trading your EBT
card for drugs and other things is I mean, you can't it's hard
to combat that. In its current form.
norms. What I'm saying is they can trust me. They had a rule
where you couldn't buy hot food. Why can't you not buy junk food?
Why can't you not buy soda pop? Why can't you not buy? You know,
Little Debbie and he's earthy? Because
it's against the corporate interests of the of the
corporation?
No, they want you fat? Yes. Early.
You're right, you're right.
I'm gonna tell you how. snack cakes are subsidized in some
kind of way. And fast food is Well, notice hamburgers are
still $1 Now when we're ramping inflation and of course I know
they're probably doing something on the ingredient side. But they
make sure fast food is always accessible to the poor. Where
the price point and in location Yeah. And that's to get you
about here as fast as possible.
Yep, I see it. I see it clearly. America is not racist. We just
we just want to kill most people.
Not even America is the one we're going world government.
Yeah. II white supremacy by nearly fuller definition.
Because we see Darwin what they mean by that now. It's like the
civilized races. We need to. That's what that's all about.
And if you can, even if you're not, quote unquote, white, if
you appeal to that monster, you're gonna, you're in, you're
good. You're good to go. Yeah, and that's why you won't hear
people in the mainstream media speak up against it. Because
they don't want to lose their spot. They want to lose their
credentials or their you know, our you know, their degrees or
whatnot. You know, that's why they keep silent. Yep. All
right. So now just
so sick, it's sick, it's sick, I tell you, it's sick.
And just to prove that both sides are being controlled. Oh,
now we're gonna jump over this is Anthony Cecil Sutton. And he
was he taught economics at California State, and was a
research fellow at Stanford University. So he's well
credentialed, you know, I mean, like, from the from the higher
up, so we have, you know, take his word with some credibility,
but he's gonna draw a connection between Western corporates,
eight corporate corporations and the Nazis.
Once we can agree upon a capitalist communist conspiracy,
then we have to study the nature of the power elite, and the
super rich, and the people who have the feeling that they
control the planet and that we belong to them. And we are used
by them to their ends. But this is a type of person who has no
national loyalties. Who is capable of running large
corporations and starting wars, using wars, for effecting
change, and so forth. If you look through history, you can
identify these figures and you can identify them today. So to
me, all of that makes sense.
Okay, who was the speaking? Oh,
that was she's this the interviewer she did like this
preamble before she started, okay. And she's just saying what
she, how she saw his work and how to be described. So I should
have explained that a little bit better. But basically, they own
you. They aren't and I had to be honest, one of the first
appealing things and was slightly Sure. I don't want to
use word triggering, but it kind of raised my antennas. When I
first listened to no agenda when you got to the Shut up slave
segment. Because of the the programming programming is like
shut up slave like
well, we consider everyone to be a slave of Gitmo nation.
That was what was appealing about it. Well, I'm just showing
you carrying something then processing and realize, oh, you
all get it. Yeah, we're all slaves. Yes. Yes. That's the
charm about it. What are the many times about the show? That
the lizard people like I said, You have me Hey, we're good to
go. I really I
hooked you and reeled you in didn't I got you good.
Cuz it's, they own us now? Is that a no, forever? No, but
we're complicit in our own ownership. Cuz we, we give these
corporations our money, and then they give us back these
programs. Yeah. Now, of course, meaning you can live a great
life one if we push their narrative, or embraced it, or
even just shut up, you know? It's like, yeah, just
just shut up, shut up and go along with the program. You can,
you can be very successful that way.
You're good. I mean, because you're, you're you're
intelligent, you know, you don't have any skin in the game.
I I remember going back to the Netherlands, end of 1999. And,
you know, I had taken a company public I clearly had done well.
And very quickly, I was invited into the elite parties, you
know, with politicians and people who are big in industry
and yeah, it was like weird stuff like fashion shows, etc.
And I noticed that they were all kind of like, Hey, this is a hot
new dude. Let's see. What's What's he got going on? How can
we use him and they quickly found out that I was not to be
Manipur. Ladies and I really was not interested. And I got kicked
out of every group uninvited never happened again. So they
are the most dangerous. Yes, yes. Because if you understand
it, don't go along with it. And this goes back to that
585 510 85 thing that they think 85% Of People are sheep. Right.
And it's in the Five Percenters believe it's a it's a belief
system that was popularized by the Wu Tang Clan. But I mean, it
was way but is this the way before them? And it's basically
85% of the people are sheep 10% of the people who know what's
going on, but that split the sheep, within 5% of the people
know what's going on. And they seek to help the 85 to see
what's going on. Right? Right. Like they tried to get you in
the team, which another term for the Boulay is the talented 10.
Talented Tim that's what they're called.
Talented, talented. 10th talented? Yes.
I'd never heard of that.
Yes, that was the one. And this is where that thing comes in to
say, Oh, they're not all of them. Some are different. Yeah.
So then that's when they come in and start to get you in the
gifted programs. And we're out you out away from the trick baby
thing. Right, right. We can't let them be free agents out
here. We got to rope them in. And I think you were kind of
going going through that same process of Oh, you're very
influential. We need to have you on our team. Oh, you don't want
to be on our team? Oh, you get that Alex Jones treatment. That
bottom is feeling like baby. Because it's you can't now that
we know that, you know, we it's kind of like the bank robber.
Right. Right. It's like, once you see my face, I got to kill
you now. So yeah, this is his man is wow. It is
when you say it when you see it. So clearly. It really
is. I think when we come and laugh about it and market, it
helps.
Well, but also what's really interesting is how it really is
covered up by this universal racism thing. Right? So the
cover up is oh, all white Trump voters are the problem in
America. They're the racist. They're super racist. They're
Uber racist. They're not even worth talking about. They're so
racist.
And listen how the conversation goes. Because in this is a
demographic they started using. I don't know how recent it was,
you wouldn't know better to me because you cover like the
political news in very detail. But this and this, where they
call it non college educated voter. Yeah. That really started
being a Democrat demographic, you know, yeah.
Well, that really ratcheted up with Trump. I mean, it's always
been there. It's been there. I remembered from Bush years.
Actually, during Obama, and probably is when it really
started to ramp up. You didn't vote for Obama racist. You don't
like Obama racist, you're racist. And you
know why, though, because they haven't been the college. Yes,
that's, that's the that's a clear indicator. So I'm just
showing you how they put it right out on front street in
front of your face when they use the demographics like, oh, yeah,
college educated voters. And this is where, in the 2020
election, a plush pressure was applied to the moderates to say,
you don't want to be like a dumb Trump voters do Oh, no. No,
those troglodytes. You know, that kind of that kind of thing
is like, whoa, accelerated fast Neanderthals throwing all the
big words around. During that whole time, so yeah, they
they're right on frustrated with it. So now we get to get to Mr.
Anthony Sutton and clip, the next clip, part two.
So you've just made a rather shocking statement. And that
statement is that American or international capitalist, as I
call them, because they don't have any American loyalties
would prefer to have socialist and communist captive states so
that they can have captive markets.
Yes, these people are not American, that internationalists
and they're part of being internationalist in the private
conversation. And you just gave a quotation which I found in the
State Department files from William Saunders, Chairman of
Ingersoll Rand, saying he thinks that Soviet communism the best
form of government have the best form of government for the
Soviet Union. When you talk to these gentlemen, there's no
question The they want power. And the power and the political
sense equates to socialism, whether you call it national
socialism or the Bolshevik socialism doesn't really matter
when you get centralized power, centralized political control.
That is what these internationalist gentlemen want.
They do not believe, as I've seen them in the American way,
the Constitution of the United States. They don't believe in
personal liberty for you and I. And I was talking to a gentleman
today who had worked in one of these corporate structures, and
he remarked how it was just like, a little socialist state
where people are numbered. They perform numbered actions.
They're little cogs in the wheel. That is what these
gentlemen want.
Oh, yeah. The dream. Right. That's what that's what the meta
verse is going to be.
And just to give you some personal perspective about this,
that I've gone through this after leaving corporate America
when I went to work in corporate America, I dress nice, right? I
mean, because I had to go to work, you know, and I'm a nice
dress, you know, naturally. Um,
wow, that's really presumptuous. You
know, what I mean? is like, I mean, like, I'm, like, even
amongst my peers, you know, I like to drink look myself, but I
will come from work, and people would see you differently. Now
that I'm new in my new business,
right, you know, you're not dressed up the way you wear
shorts,
t shirt, you know, they look at you differently. Um, and it's
just jarring, right? You know, kind of like they look past you.
It doesn't bother me. But of course, I'll take notice to
everything.
Now, when you say for when you say they obviously, it's not the
same people you were interacting with before? Because you left
the corporation. Do you mean talk
about outside of work? Just when I'm going? I was going home from
work, and I stopped by the store. See, that? Was that
different appearance? Oh, you're dim dress nice. You're so so
presentable. I'll speak to you.
Boy, it wasn't a Joe Biden, who said about Barack Obama that he
was saying, Well spoken. I don't remember him saying clean, but
as you say,
clean.
You might be right. You might be right. She
was she was one of the ones on her left there say he was clean.
He might not have been Joe Biden. But that was one of the
attributes later. That was linked to Obama. Well, yeah, it
was, um, you looking it up? Yeah. Obviously.
I was trying to see if I had a clip of that. I don't Okay, I
don't think now
I'm gonna say what he did speak to his being different. This is
Yes, I agree to that point, that Barack Obama was different in
some way. So I'm gonna just say staining that. Just how society
we all have this looking down mentality, right? You know,
we're looking for somebody to look down on to feel better,
which plays great into the hand of what grants and everything.
It could be narcissism, whatever else how you want to call it.
So. Alright, let's see, I think we started to 13. Let's go to
14.
They also supported Hitler, the very same people. So they
support the left, they support the right. So you go back to the
Hungarian dialectic thesis versus antithesis gives you a
synthesis. If they want a synthesis of new world order,
they will get conflict, conflict between apart left apart, right.
That might be another reason that the captors want captive
markets. They don't want to see the Soviet Union as another free
enterprise free society. And this is still the freest society
in the world and United States. So they they do these countries,
whether it be the Soviet Union in 1917, or Nicaragua today,
they do in these countries to Marxist dictatorship, so that
they can be controlled from the economic and the political and
financial viewpoint through what I see is the coming New World
Order, the second new world so maybe a combination of patience
and as a deliberate creation of conflict within this bar.
Oh, man, we're well on our way. Oh, yeah, we're deep navy right
road ahead and they're fast, fast track. But just to go back
to the Obama statement is the story I'm seeing in Biden's
description Obama draws scrutiny. Biden called Obama
first clean African American candidate.
What a dope,
which, which I think we played even more than him using poor
Joe. I didn't like I gotta call them for Joe, ischemia, he's
running with a third term he's like, Yeah, claim, huh? Yeah,
well spoken.
Talk for me, Joe, talk for me. All right, monkey boy.
So you hear so you hear what? We had it on the right road, and I
just played those static clips to show even in this eugenics,
whatever else. I think they're playing both sides. And one of
the things I want people to be cautious of now that Roe v Wade
has been struck down as unconstitutional. I have a
question. Can sterilization be made illegal on the state level?
For sterilization, or just sterilization?
sterilization? Yes. I don't any you have no recourse. It sounds
like because like, we don't hear we're Oh, if Roe was not meant
to write
well, I mean, sterilization, of course, is there's no unborn
child involved only future unborn children, that will not
happen,
which I think would be a lower hurdle.
A lower hurdle for what
to get to pass?
I don't see. I don't think you need to make it legal. It's
legal as is. It's not an illegal procedure. It's encouraged,
obviously, maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're
saying.
But no, but there'll be some pushback. Of course, we people,
sterilizing the line and Nazis. Well, I know we can legally do
it, you know, that kind of argument, the reverse with Roe
versus Wade or
but you're talking about forced sterilization then? Because as a
volunteer,
I don't want to use for I don't want to use force numbers, you
can voluntarily
kill yourself in most states. It's not worse,
let's say coerced? Yes, I will let you be honest with us the
UBI thing?
Well, yes, I completely believe that that can be deemed legal.
And the one roadblock has been removed out of the way. Now it
depends.
I think, I don't know. I don't know if that really removes the
roadblock. I'm not sure.
The reason why I'm saying let me explain my point here be clear.
If you move row out the way to say, hey, we the Supreme Court
can't legislate on whether, you know, it's a constitutional
right to have a child or not have a child, we're kicking it
back down to the states. Now the states can say, hey, you know,
we'll offer money to get you sterilized. And I don't think
that could really make it back to the Supreme Court under the
same now. It could be brought there I think, but I don't think
they I think they were ruling saying
I don't even think it'll be controversial if states
introduced that. I think people would be oh, this is great.
There will be there'll be no controversy. People who had no I
think that's that's a really scary, I'm telling you, I think
it would be like oh, this is fantastic. I want I want a
family. Let all those dumb efforts, let them take the money
and do stuff. Whatever. Enjoy that.
No. Free doughnuts and free french fries like the vaccine. I
got sterilized I think
I think it is a natural progression of the plan. And I
don't see why there would be any pushback at all.
Wow, you look at it. Yeah.
I've been thinking about this for a couple of weeks. You
really set me started me up on this? And I'm like, Yeah, you
know, I can if people take cut, it was okay to give people a
damn burger and fries to get a death shot. A heart Dart.
A no free Krispy Kremes. Yeah, Krispy Kreme donut, 100
calories.
Even better example. So that was that was celebrated. Come on,
that was celebrate it
was grown it for climate. I'm doing it for the climate.
Now. There's another reason people be happy to do it.
I think that would be the biggest reason. It's it's the
virtue reason.
Yeah, it's the reason absolutely the already. I mean, it was just
I think it was on my mind had been PBS. They were interviewing
young women who were either had been sterilized or had or were
had scheduled to be sterilized because of climate change. And
it's there's no controversy over it.
And now because a feature of the vaccine is a feature, now, it's
over. Because you ain't get sterilized.
Except you don't get any UBI you don't get any money. So that's
kind of a gyp. We got to you know, people are gonna catch on,
wait a minute, I need to get compensated. I think it's in the
cards mo I'm, I'm certain of it. And it's funny because that's
the Shockley theory that people Were so outraged by in 1974.
In this is his last point is the doubt raised because he's saying
the glass, they say the quiet part out loud, not that a ska
crazy idea. It was like shaking your head on the script, you
know, like how Oh, like, shut up.
He didn't, he didn't have climate change. That's that's
the difference he had. He had dis Genex he didn't have climate
change. If you got climate change, you can sell it.
Okay. Alright, so I guess, let's just jump a little bit ahead.
And let's go ahead and go to America's campaign to create a
master race. But now,
there's a resurgence of the same impulse that caused eugenics in
the first place. I'm speaking of new Genex. And this time, it
will not be racial dogma, national flags. This time, it
will be globalization, profit, bottom line, corporate activity
that determines who is fit and who is not fit to continue their
existence. And legislators are seeing this as the new threat of
discrimination in the 21st century. And anti genetic
legislation is already embraced by nations all over the world.
And this legislation is in our Congress. Now. Surely, after I
speak, the first vote is going to take place in the Senate to
adopt anti genetic discrimination laws to stop gene
lining, we all remember what redlining was. Now it will be
gene lining. And so as we go into the dazzling 21st century,
of genetic genies, we hope to help as many miracles as
possible come our way. But we also ask that Wall Street and
these corporations and our society look over their shoulder
and make sure that genetics does not return from whence it came.
Yeah, look,
those laws up actually, the genetic discrimination law. It's
called Gina I think, gi Na, would you find there's
loopholes? There's loopholes
anywhere well written.
Yeah, I'll put some in the show notes. Everyone can take a look
at it. It's
like a rubber steel skin thing where you like fold it up where
you can find a loophole to get out of the deal. Yeah. So I
think the biggest thing that just to let people know that was
a throwback clip from the last show. Show 84 I think I put a
file in the thing. But yeah, so I think the biggest test is
going to be the IQ test. I really think they're going to
John Lyon based off of off of intelligence. The only problem
with that now you can take your goggles off is the flawed
science show. Yes. And orcas.
Yes. Is this 15? Because it's really good story.
Yes, it's going jumping to 15.
In 1905, psychologists Alfred Binet and Theodore Simone
designed a test for children who were struggling in school in
France, designed to determine which children required
individualized attention. Their method formed the basis of the
IQ test. Beginning in the late 19th century, researchers
hypothesized that cognitive abilities like verbal reasoning,
working memory, and visual spatial skills reflected an
underlying general intelligence or G factor, C Mon, and Binay,
designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities
and combine the results into a single score. Questions were
adjusted for each age group, and a child score reflected how they
performed relative to others their age, dividing someone's
score by their age and multiplying the result by 100
yielded the intelligence quotient for IQ.
Yes, dynamite. This is real, this is really good.
So for the people listening at home, the way they calculate
this score, and I want to be clear that we were on the same
page, they take your score, divided by your age and then
multiply it by 100. That's how you get your score. So let's say
if you were let's rewind it back a little bit again, so I want
people to hear how he explains it.
As an actor, Simone and Binay designed a battery of tests to
measure each of these abilities and combine the results in to a
single score, questions were adjusted for each age group, and
a child score reflected how they performed relative to others
their age right
now to go back further, I said before now, you could
be someone score
by their age and multiplying the result by 100 yielded the
intelligence quotient for IQ,
right? Dividing by age times 100.
Right? So that bottom age is very, I want to say,
questionable, but so say a child is four and it performs as an
eight year old, right? Then you can have an IQ, just say IQ of
200, right? When you get tested later, doesn't mean you had to
go higher. So you're gonna get tested into your six. Now you
had to perform as a 12 year old. Right? If I'm understanding the
math, the math equation correctly. So could early it's
not just a question more than anything. And please, if anybody
has more information on the IQ test, explain it to me if I'm
wrong, but does testing the child earlier give the child an
advantage than waiting later?
See, to me the history I heard of the IQ test, and this is the
C mon Binay scale, but it's about the questions. And the
questions are ones that they use that had Rikers Island at Ellis
Island. Ellis Island, Rikers Island, but they were
questioning, but they were kind of rigged. Right? They were kind
of rigged questions, like, you know, stuff that was cultural
things, like, you know, who's you know, what team won the
World Series, you know, someone who's an immigrant coming in, of
course, had no idea even what the World Series was, perhaps.
So it's it always comes down to the questions. That wasn't
the balance for Western it was wasn't Silver Spoon. Right? That
culture would have greater influence. I'm speaking more.
And that's, you're totally right. Could that history of is
troubling to say the least. But also make it to the modern test?
If you start testing children earlier, now I'm just asking the
question, but I mean, when you look at numbers, would that give
you an advantage? If you tick because you have a lower of your
440, you had to test like an eight year old to have an IQ
score of 200. Now I understand to be 12. I understand what what
you're saying. I
don't know how that works in practice. I can I can see how
it's the whole thing is screwed. Does it makes no sense.
And so much is based off of it? Because I think I don't I don't
remember maybe mama facts can tell me if I ever had an IQ
test. But have you had one?
No, no, the only test that places? I mean? Well, it's not
the LSAT isn't LSAT, one, one version of it.
I noticed a standardized test.
I'm sure it's all rolled into common core. I'm sure it's being
extrapolated from our current curriculum somehow.
Now, we did take the California achievement test coming up in
school, that was the standardized test of the time,
kind of like the EOC is now but I'm just saying a straight up IQ
test. Because it has so much hinges on it. You would think
one of the two of us wish she had had it to say is this person
Yeah, but we're different model. We're not like everybody else
right?
Now give them access, you know, that might get access to places
you don't need to be. But now I just want to ask that question
about the age because that was more of a question and a
statement. Because it seems like if the younger I mean, because
we're talking about these elite daycares, private schools, a lot
of that hinges off of the IQ test. So now we're saying if you
haven't had that test, even access to the test, those doors
not might not be open to you.
It totally possible I just don't know enough about it.
Okay, so I just wanted to see if you if you knew that and if
anybody else knows I would like to learn more I couldn't find
the answer to that. But I just wanted to bring that up because
so much hands like I said so much hinges on it, especially I
don't think for our age groups but like younger everything's
about testing
and I think that's the point I think the the IQ results are
built into dude I've been talking to our teacher friend
who teaches high school in Austin is known as the liberal
high school teacher there's all this shit that they him because
I'm like, I was actually talking about this very topics it Can
you discuss eugenics in your class versus, you know, when it
comes to Darwinism and how it fits into civics? And she said,
Oh, you know, I can't even And do that because my colleagues
would ask me if I feel comfortable rewriting history,
which is interesting. And and also should it's really not a
part, you know, they have all of these. And she started to show
me how you have to teach. It's called in Texas, the T k s the
Texas educational knowledge standard. And that's what
they're tested on. So I think it's inherent into the testing
and into the into the reporting results, which as we know, have
constantly been skewed to keep dumb, undereducated kids looking
like geniuses and passing to the next grade. In other words,
lowered the standards. So I think that's the whole
educational system has become one big IQ test.
And if you see the speaking on generalized standardized test,
the LSAT, yeah. When I was coming out, like I remember kids
after school would go to the lunch room and once parent who
could afford it, and get the LSAT prep prep. Yeah. And they
would basically teach them how to take the test. No, I didn't
have that when I took it. And I did very wellness at you. But
I'm just like being able, like, that's where that's where, like,
do money, like I'm having no access means can, you know can
actually control the doors that are open for you? Yep. All
right, so I guess we started to 15. Let's go on down to 16.
Today, a score of 100 represents the average of a sample
population, with 68% of the population scoring within 15
points of 100. C mon and Binay, thought the skills their test
assessed would reflect general intelligence. But both then and
now there's no single agreed upon definition of general
intelligence. And that left the door open for people to use the
test in service of their own preconceived assumptions about
intelligence. What started as a way to identify those who needed
academic help, quickly became used to sort people in other
ways, often in service of deeply flawed ideologies. One of the
first large scale implementations occurred in the
United States during World War One, when the military used an
IQ test to sort recruits and screen them for officer
training. Oh,
I didn't know. Oh, yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah.
You go to the trenches. Yeah, you stay in the tent.
Right. And that's kind of like what the ASVAB is. Yeah. Can we
send to the front, oh, all the low scores that are front. It's
amazing how much is based off a testing but this is I wanted to
touch on again, this is sorting people that lens, go back to the
blu ray thing. This is how they create the Boulay. They start
testing kids at you know, four or five years old, you get on an
academically gifted track, then you get on the AP track. Then
you get on the you know, oh, they're fit for Ivy League. And
it goes from there. Wrong Rhodes Scholar, Rhodes Scholar. I mean,
yeah, and he's just keep going up the ladder. And those people
who their whole identity hinges on, you know, the system, let's
just call it that. So they're not going to combat the system.
That's why they go that's why they play along right with him.
While they Boulais is quite, not only ineffective, but is is a
detriment to the who they supposed to represent. But they
embrace that, or you're different. You know, that's why
they always like lead off with these long titles like Dr. Song
sold better than 19 letters. The honorable. Yeah, and I'm not,
I'm not trying to diminish, diminish anybody's achievement.
But when you become a prisoner of your achievements, and you've
seen this with doctors, like they will quietly say, Oh, we
know this is not right. But they're so scared to lose their,
you know, their place in society that they go
right along with it's capture, it's capture, but they've
been groomed. If I can still say that word. They've been groomed
to think they're elite. At from an early age. You know, you
don't have people like do well in 11th grade and become
doctors. I mean, that's like it's possible, but it's highly
unlikely you had to be on a track. Wait, I mean, you look at
some of the presidential candidates and politicians that
will put in that track. Yeah, are way early on. They tried to
get mo but now I'm serious because my brother was on the
faculty academic grade gifted track. And they tested me when I
went in their room. I was like, this is weird. Why
wait? What are they? Like an IQ test?
I guess I mean, I don't know, per se an IQ test, but it was,
oh, you know, I was performing very well on my gen pop. So they
wanted to bring me over and it was like when I got in there
like purpose. I remember it was fourth grade, I was in an MS
full sheets class. And they were like, Oh, we want to know, they
came and got me out of class. I felt special. When I got in the
room, and I was like, this is weird. It was weird to me. I
mean, even at a young age, so I tanked on purpose.
No, you did not.
I did. I'm serious. You tanked it on purpose. Yes.
And you were how old?
I was in fourth grade.
Oh, that's that's some foresight, brother. Hey, is that
is that Rocco? Is Rocco freaking out on over there? Can you hear
me? Yeah, a little bit in the back. I don't mind.
Okay. Yes, yes. That's the home. But yeah. Yeah. And I told the
story before, but then I won, like seventh grade. Seventh
grade treasurer for the school. And they're like, Oh, you're
gonna be a future Freedom Rider.
And, uh, yeah, right. Yeah. They want you to get on the bus and
do the mock Freedom Ride. Oh, yeah, that's right now they did
try to get you. You're right.
Yeah. Oh, well, I've been. I've had a couple of new brushes, the
Boulais recruitment.
We were glad you survived all that.
I just didn't feel weird. I mean, I that's all I can tell
you. I'm not like I had like, serious insight. God, God had a
different plan for you. Oh, yeah. You're gonna be a podcast
in one day. So like,
no freedom writer for you podcasters the future? That's
right. All right.
19.
At that time, many people believed in eugenics, the idea
that desirable and undesirable genetic traits could and should
be controlled in humans through selective breeding. There were
many problems with this line of thinking, among them the idea
that intelligence was not only fixed and inherited, but also
linked to a person's race. Under the influence of eugenics,
scientists used the results of the military initiative to make
erroneous claims that certain racial groups were
intellectually superior to others, without taking into
account that many of the recruits tested were new
immigrants to the United States who lacked formal education or
English language exposure. They created an erroneous
intelligence hierarchy of ethnic groups. The intersection of
eugenics and IQ testing influenced not only science, but
policy as well.
Exactly. This is 17, by the way, not 19. Just Oh,
excuse me, sorry about that. That's okay. And this is the
root of white supremacy. Yes, this is this is and you see,
it's tied closely to Darwinism and evolution, like this. We you
start trying to get that pit out. The whole thing could
collapse. And this is why they don't want to talk about it.
This is exactly why they don't want to talk about it. Because
now it's like, okay, if the IQ doesn't work, then what do we
use? And it's still biased.
But I think they're beyond that. I mean, to me, it see, and when
when I say they, it's the lizard people, it's the eight 900
people who probably run the world. I think they're beyond it
that just like, Okay, we're gonna put this stuff in place.
This will reduce the population, people in the know. Or people
who have just figured it out will survive, and they'll
survive because they will will do certain things won't do other
things. But they're making it increasingly difficult for
everybody, particularly food and energy. And, and I think I think
they're being non discriminatory. Now, I don't
think I just move beyond it.
What, how wrong, I had to push back on that, because I think is
very disturbing, discriminatory, because if you're born into the
right families, you're going to be alright. I mean, you could be
dumb as a rock. You could be you could No, I agree. Hence they
say smoke Parmesan cheese, and you're gonna be alright, so I
agree. She's gonna give you millions of dollars. So right
but so you don't need to test you just need to make sure
someone's from the right family, you just need to look at the you
don't need to test you just need to go to the right college. You
need to be in the right sorority or fraternity.
Well, they also have to leave the door open for the quote
unquote, different ones, you know? Oh, and I think we talked
about in our last show with the LSAT or maybe we didn't, but
they have this way now of looking at your zip code. And
they kind of give you a grade you're on a curve. So it's like
okay, you made the throw a fictitious number out here. You
made 1200 But coming from where you come from, right, you get an
extra 100. Right because of, but that's the kind of people they
look for because he or she if they overachieve, in those
environments, that's the kind of person we need. Okay, so they
always got to keep that door open to lead for upward mobility
so that you born you're not gonna go down. If you born in
the right family, it's no
longer calling. It's making sure you pick the cherries out. Yes.
Okay. I'm with you on that.
Alright, so let's go ahead and go to 18.
In 1924, the state of Virginia created policy, allowing for the
forced sterilization of people with low IQ scores, a decision
the United States Supreme Court upheld in Nazi Germany, the
government authorized the murder of children based on low IQ.
Following the Holocaust and the civil rights movement, the
discriminatory uses of IQ tests were challenged on both moral
and scientific grounds, scientists began to gather
evidence of environmental impacts on IQ. For example, as
IQ tests were periodically recalibrated over the 20th
century, new generations scored consistently higher on old tests
than each previous generation, this phenomenon known as the
Flynn effect happened much too fast to be caused by inherited
evolutionary traits. Instead, the cause was likely
environmental, improved education, better health care,
and better nutrition.
the Flynn effect is that what that was called the Flynn
effect,
the Flynn effect. So over time, in general, all scores go up.
Now, could that be? Like I said, due to better education are
easier questions?
Yeah, easier questions? I mean, you mean, I would think it could
possibly be just like increased intelligence. I mean, we all
learn more. But I think the quality of education is the real
issue, because I don't want to get too far ahead. But there's a
gap. This is this. And it stays the same, even though both are
on an upward trajectory. Right, you know, the space between the
two lines stay the same. So I'm right. And another point I
wanted to bring in there is nature versus nurture and
nutrition. Because this is a big
Yeah, nutrition. Nutrition is not even brought into the
equation. I don't think it was whereas we know how important it
is
very important. I mean, not only what you eat, but when you eat
that was kind of how the whole thing about the breakfast
program so kids don't go to school hungry. So they can, you
know, get a good, good start off to their day. But even then,
they have these programs, but the bus gets there to miss
something. I witnessed my own eyes, that the bus gets there
too late when the kids can't make it down to the cafeteria
eat. Or it's you know, it's just some slop. That's the other
thing. Yeah. So yeah, so nature versus nurture is a big thing
here. Wish the darn Darwinist thing is majority nature is not
I mean, use hard coded, you know, I think we spoke about
like computers, you know, everybody bought the same specs,
or is this like you're a Dounreay was like, Okay, you
just don't have their hard drive and RAM and you're seeing the
cube do this computation to share a Chromebook. Sorry.
Right, then they look at it. Um, this is crazy. But that's,
that's that's exactly how they look at it. So I guess now we
can go and get into number 19. I got a little ahead of myself,
and this is going to talk about the testing more.
In the mid 20th century, psychologists also attempted to
use IQ tests to evaluate things other than general intelligence,
particularly schizophrenia, depression, and other
psychiatric conditions. These diagnoses relied in part on the
clinical judgment of the evaluators, and used a subset of
the tests used to determine IQ. A practice later research found
does not yield clinically useful information. Today, IQ tests
employ many similar design elements and types of questions
as the early tests, though, we have better techniques for
identifying potential bias in a test. They're no longer used to
diagnose psychiatric conditions. But a similarly problematic
practice. Using sub test scores is still sometimes used to
diagnose learning disabilities. against the advice of many
experts. Psychologists around the world still use IQ tests to
identify intellectual disability and the results can be used to
determine appropriate educational support, job
training and assisted living. IQ test results have been used to
justify horrific policies and scientifically baseless
ideologies. That doesn't mean the test itself is worthless. In
fact, it does a good job of measuring the reasoning and
problem solving skills it sets out to. But that isn't the same
thing as measuring a person's potential.
Yeah, again, the more I hear this, the more I'm convinced
that they've just built all this shit right into their
standardized test, standardized testing. Lord knows where the
results go. I mean, it's all online, it's all back to
Department of Education. I think this is the this is the basis.
This is what it is, is how it's used. But it's, it's probably
just built into the system now. For for, you know, for what you
call the, you know, picking the cherries out, it's like, hey,
you know,
this, this, this one's doing well is that No Child Left
Behind, they tell me they tell you in the policies, they do, No
Child Left Behind, it's like, Okay, we're gonna take the
smartest kids out of the quote, unquote, and this is their term
dumbest schools, and move them along. And just one more thing,
before we wrap up the segment, is that, here's another problem.
When you tie money to testing, this is a real occurrence.
Parents coaching their kids to perform poorly. So they can get
the monetary gains that come along with having learning
disabilities. To say I'm real thing, this is a very real
thing, because and if you think about it, if you're in abject
poverty, and you can get another $700,000 Because your son has to
sit in a different class, the short term thinking is like
okay, I can use this and what the other one is bouncing deals
like no man house.
Yeah, what programs are delivering that though, if your
child is special, because they're, they're behind.
When you get when you have a learning disability, you can get
a check. And it's a tire like get a check. That's what they
call it, like, get a check. So if you have a learning
disability, he's like SSI or Social Security, or somebody
cuts you a check for your child. And
I don't know anything about this. Yes.
So we you asked a poor person is your desk. And they'll frame it
in a way asking you to perform a little behind, you know, and not
and I say it's not the majority, but it is a real occurrence.
Because I've seen it and heard it discussed, that parents
coached your kids to perform poorly Wow. Or inadvertently
sabotage them, so they can get more money. And that just lends
to more to the what the UBI conversation totally you know,
you you'd be surprised what people would do for money when
they're in when you're in a
tight spot. Especially.
And this guy, this gave birth to a term called the alphabet kids
because the kids will have like, be American. My mom was a social
worker was a social worker. She's a therapist now. Um, but
you have B H L D does learn disability, ad that's what ad a
hyperactive ADHD AD AD USA me all these things. If your child
is associated with that, there is money that's tied to that. As
well as pills.
The pills are, well, it's kind of goes hand in hand. We'll give
you some money, but you got to put them on the pills too.
So like the parents like okay, and it's a poor parent, one of
those unfit parents that we've talked about. They say hold on,
so you're gonna give me something to calm him down? Are
you gonna give me a check? Right? Boy, you go on here and
make a good score on this test. I bust your head while I'm that
Nash. You're laughing? And I'm sad to say it. Yeah, but this is
a real saying but nobody thinks about the long term. What is
that child end up at? 18 years old would a legal drug habit and
no skills. Yeah,
that's exactly what happens.
So um, so. Alright, so I guess we can thanks some people for
making this show happen. Yes, let's
revisit what we're all about.
The white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at
the same table. The white man has to feel free to speak his
mind without hurting the feelings of that negro. And the
so called Negro has to feel free to speak his mind without
hurting the feelings of the white man then They can bring
the issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and
take an intelligent approach to get the problem themselves.
That's the only way we'll ever do it.
And I think we've done just that during this episode. So we'll
open honesty love that it is Mo facts with Adam curry episode 85
value for value was the only way that this comes to you. And let
me just revisit because you have to understand this is now the
new international lifestyle living value for value. People
are seeing how well it works. What you do is you hear this,
you consume this, you take it in it has value to you or not if
and if you're still listening at this point two hours in, you've
got to and you see no value you've got to question what
you're doing with your time. However, whatever the value is
that you get from it, all you have to do and only you can
determine that is send it back to us in some monetary forms a
couple of different ways to do it. We have our podcasting 2.0
Boost booster grounds. We'll thank those people in a moment
but first we have our Fiat fun coupons people who went to mo
fund me.com Or just to the donation page and Mo fox.com.
We've helped us out mainly through cash app and PayPal and
we start off with our big baller shot caller 20 his blades on him
Paula grant G comes in with 199 dot 99 and says appreciate the
work. Ballers be ballin I guess grant already knew that. He was
going to going to be the big baller keep it up.
He must must be your cousin from the future. By the way, it's
creative design versus everyone else. I'm not sure I understand
the context. He saw him I think evolution. Oh, okay. Right. Got
it. Yeah, I could share my personal beliefs. But this is
not the forum. Work on stay strong or thank you very much
grant you we appreciate that. Judy Schwartz 185 today from
Judy says thank you both and we both Thank you, Jose retana $100
And he says standing ovation for episode 84 Thank you Mo and
Adam. Thank you. We have Amy M with the 85 and this is a show
club donation from Dame SL slammy. Slay me I should say
Dame slay me. Yes, Amy slay me slay me got it. You'll be there.
You'll be listed. Amy Thank you very much. See Davis 53 dot 33 A
no note. I wonder it's interesting. This number. I'm
not quite sure the 33 rings familiar to me. Rochelle. S same
number 5333. No note, just know that the facts family love is
here for you. Thanks for everything. And we appreciate
that very much. Carlito. Carlito Hearst $50 Megan Emory. $50.
Kyle man. 50. William Taylor comes in with 50 and says
knowledge. Great job, gentlemen. Thank you, Christina H $50. She
says she's paying attention now. I hear you. We love that you're
paying attention. Z n $50. wants a D dead beating.
Congratulation. You're no longer a deadbeat.
Thanks mo for all your shows. Here's a little something and
I'm glad to chip in. Man, we hate this chip. And wants a mo
karma sending you
tons of good off energy.
Things that haven't played that in a while. You've got karma.
Play this other one too. Here we go. You've got that's what I
wanted. And then our final Associate Executive Producers
we've run through the list at $50 is Jill W. Who sells love
you guys in the show. Can I please get a mo karma yet? We'll
roll it out for you. You've got mo calm. We'll be thanking the
rest of these producers later on. First a quick switch to the
booster grams that we received. Now this works with podcasting
2.0 It's great because the minute you get that urge, like I
want to send some value back right next to the play button is
a boost button and you can even send a message along with it.
And the traditional financial system takes no cut. It's direct
peer to peer and we kick it off with Sir Shaun of the Allegheny
Valley 100,000 SATs we really appreciate that a nice a nice
boost for us. He says they're running different experiments
and all of us to see which gets them and what they want the
quickest and cheapest will we wake up in time. Some will, some
will. You would like a WUSA.
lavish comes in with a row of nines 99,999 It says always
great we appreciate that. 84,000 from hard hat 50,000 from Chad
Farrow 40 949 from Auburn citadel 44 and 37 for Merlin he
sent in two boosts another one for 48 827. These are meaningful
numbers this this makes a difference in our lives. We
appreciate that. We got
some converts. Yo Yeah, yes. Here's the Convert names come
from the Fiat oversight of the booths
we love. Yeah, we love that really appreciate it. You can
use your cash out by the way to fill up one of these podcasts
and 2.0 apps new podcast apps.com clewd 33,333. I don't
know who turned me on to this. One of the most previous efforts
episodes but I know I heard the recommendation from OFAC show.
So, passing it on I read the book war against the week by
Edwin black. Yes. We discussed this on no agenda. This is very
much he says Mr. Black did a deep dive in a mountain of
research into the American eugenics programs with an early
1900s The book can be done downloaded. You can also buy it
I purchased it also every show is so jam packed with research.
I don't care how long Moe it takes to get recorded. Just get
it done. And then he ends up with a go podcasting we haven't
had one of those in a while Hold on a second Do I have a I do a
go podcasting where do you go
is that is that alright right there
that's what you think But hold on a second book go maybe this
works we also no no. Here it is. Can't believe I misplaced that
sorry about that. It's very unprofessional. Sir Dwayne metal
unsewn comes in with 33,333 as well he says episode 84 was very
enlightening. Living in the Pacific North woke all the
messaging you get a saturated with very one sided perspective
the our BG clips were surprising. And around here, RGB
is almost defined is almost defied. I'm trying to see what
he's right here. RGB is almost Oh, deified and there's a big
iHeart RGB sign a couple of miles down the road from my
house. For example, by the way y'all is the most inclusive
pronoun. On a related note, if you're ever asked for your
pronouns, try putting them down as Daddy Daddy daddy's okay.
Okay, sir Dwayne, you will try doing that for sure. That Texas
rancher says, doing great, y'all. This is what I can do for
now was 25,000. It's appreciated sir WAGs. 15,033. Thank you for
your courage. Todd is in Northern Virginia, a row of
sticks 11,111 C dubs with 10,000 101. And we have smoked
meal finally at 10,000. He says I'm here for the conspiracy
facts. Well, you came to the right place, didn't you? Thank
you again for these boosts for these booster grams. If you'd
like to. Onboard real quick just to see how everything works, you
can use the fountain app you can even earn some of the SATs by
listening to other shows, and then send them to us. And for
all of that information mo facts.com. Go to the donation
page or mo Funmi Mo Mo e fu nd me.com And thank you to these
producers for bringing us some value. For more facts with Adam
curry, episode number 85.
Can I show you for one more thing? Of course. Can I get a
biscuit for each class aka the coach who say
oops, sorry about that. Ready for now we
just celebrate his birthday this week. So All righty.
They always give me a biscuit on my birthday. Just big ass
biscuit for you class.
Yeah. They're big biscuit out the way. Oh, why you're in
there. Give the trigger warning. We're ready. So because this,
this next set of clips right here. This is where we start to
see racial evolution being applied by a racist and I don't
mean it as a disparaging term, but I wouldn't classify anything
else. This is Jared Taylor. How you heard of Jared Taylor
before?
I don't think so. Okay, hold on. Let me do the trigger warning
first. Oops, here we
go. All right, we're ready. Now we're good to go.
This is some cold hard race truth 20 A
why to blacks behave the way they do. Why is it that whenever
we read certain headlines, we can be almost certain that the
story is about black people. For example, for dead including
child after stimulus check dispute leads to gunfire. Or how
about toddler died after being left alone for six days as
mothers celebrated 18th birthday or to school girl carjackers
aged 13 and 15 are pulled from overturned vehicle in DC
interested for murder? And how about a postal worker in
Michigan brutally beaten by two women video shows. And then
there is the perennial, a 55 shot 10 fatal in Chicago weekend
gun violence. Even the most committed liberals must know
these stories are going to be about blacks. And anyone whose
eyes aren't shut tight knows that IQ has something to do with
it. Even the very leftist Wikipedia recognizes that on
intelligence tests, there is a difference in average score
between black people and white people have 1.1 standard
deviations. In practical terms, that means only 16% of blacks
have an IQ of 100 or higher. And it means that whites are 30
times more likely than blacks to have an IQ over 125.
All right, who is this? Jumoke?
This is Derek Taylor. He's a big pusher of the bell curve
studies, right? You can't hear him Yang or find us on YouTube.
So you probably need to get the day out this big shoot.
Bid shoot as a fan favorite
man beat you is like the is the is the YouTube of old. You know,
that's how it should be everybody should be able to put
their information out there. And if it stands up, it stands up.
And if it's if it doesn't, it gets rid of Q but this is where
the rubber meets the road it this is the water blacks behave.
Why do blacks behave? Like they do a tie you start your sentence
off like that. And this is where that blacks, the blacks, blacks?
This is where you because you asked me about that before we
use it like this,
right? Is it? Can you say blacks? Can you say the blocks?
Yeah, that was the question, right?
So he said, Why do blacks behave like they do? And he goes off,
he lists a bunch of headlines which are true. And there are
probably a huge problem. I'll never deny that. But I think
they're being amplified for a reason as well. This is
another guy who comes from the tech world. Interestingly
enough. Did you know that he was the West Coast editor for PC
Magazine for a while there in the 80s? I did not know that.
And I happen to know someone who wrote for PC Magazine in the
80s. So I'm gonna have to ask the Vortech about this guy.
That's interesting. QA,
what somebody's got what that maybe they look like, we've used
up computer analogy, but maybe they look at humans like
computers, and just say okay, they expect differently? Oh,
well, no, I think there's something to that Shockley
clearly, you know, the inventor of the transistor effect. I
would say most Silicon Valley guys and gals who are at the
top, they're all into singularity, and they believe in
a different version of eugenics and that their version is oh, we
can improve the broken ones, we can improve the bad ones, we can
improve ourselves, we can make it all better through
technology.
Right? So this is where the Darwinism meets the rubber meets
the road, where I am just to make it clear, there are issues.
There is a gap. But is it due to nature or nurture? And this is
this is the big question nobody really wants to ask. Because if
it's due to nurture, what are the things leading? What are the
main component? Is this leading to these tests services, and
these issues that we see that are prevalent in the quote
unquote, community? So, but if it's nature, then it's like,
okay, are we gonna get some Elon ships that you know, to get us
up to speed, you know, use your spoke about the singularity. But
so where does
geographic ZIP Code fall is zip code a part of nurture, or zip
codes are part of nature because zip codes being used,
will be nurture, because it's the environment you grew up in
nature's solely means, what genes was passed from your two
parents and their lineage going backwards, right? That's, that's
how you're born. You mean like whatever you receive from them.
That will be nurtured nature. Everything that happens post
birth, will be nurture, which I believe that's the real issue.
You're Being poor education, poor diet, poor environment,
over stimulation due to television and media in general.
These things, lack of culture, all of these things. And you can
add me on that when I culture. We had one we it was manipulated
in the 70s, like we talked about before with black Blaxploitation
films, no father and house, that totally ruin whatever culture we
were forming at the time. So what he goes on to speak about,
in his next clip about the bell curve, which we're gonna get
deeper into, well, I'm gonna let him continue on with history
theory.
Back in 1984, the famous book, the bell curve, reported long
established findings on the correlation between low IQ, and
all kinds of behavior. We don't want crime, poverty, their
legitimacy, shift, lessness, obesity, you name it. All these
things are a lot more likely in people with low IQs than in
smart people. But IQ isn't the whole story. If you compare
blacks and whites with the same IQs black behavior is still
different. So what's going on? The obligatory explanation is
that systemic racism and white supremacy are making life
miserable for black people. But there's a better explanation.
And Professor Richard Lin of the University of Ulster has done
the most important work on this question. He's written a book
showing that blacks across the board are more likely than
whites to be psychopaths. There's a good summary of his
findings and an article@enron.com called Race
and psychopathic personality. The American Psychiatric
Association defines psychopathic personality as including such
things as breaking rules, failure to plan ahead,
aggressiveness and frequent fighting, risk taking failure to
honor financial obligations. Being a bad parent, and
inability to be sexually faithful. Blacks are more
psychopathic than whites on all accounts. And by the way, whites
are more psychopathic than Asians.
Okay,
I respect his honesty, even though it may be flawed. And
thinking I respect the fact that he would get up in front of a
camera and state what he feels because you can't hide. And we
talked about that before, on the last show, how they tried to do
the guy from dis Genex to Silent soon. No, you got to let this be
said. Then we can have a hard, honest conversation around it.
And I'm saying it wasn't as people. But there's two words I
want to focus on here out of what he said. One, let's start
with Shift listeners. Okay, shift listeners has a Are you
familiar with that definition? First of all, well, no, i plus.
No, no.
Okay. Lacking in restraint. shiftless. Yes. shiftless. No
SHIF, T. L. E. S. S,
laziness into indolence in Dolan's and lack of ambition.
Lacking lacking This is from Merriam Webster, lacking in
resourceful resourcefulness, any efficient, okay? And if you're
resourceful that means to able to meet situation capable of
devising ways and means. So this, this goes right down to
the savage mind state of manifest destiny said, hey,
they're not resourceful. They have all those natural
resources. And they're living in mud huts. we're entitled to go
to them and take their land. They're Savage,
they're dumb. They don't know what they're doing. They have no
clue.
This, this goes key back to what doorwins was talking about. Like
they're, they're not. They're inefficient. Let's just boil it
down to that. Well, the reason why I want to point out this
word too is it has a cultural connotation. Maybe to people my
age and maybe older because this used to be a main component of
the definition of the N word. When the N word actually had a
definition. Before it became just a derogatory term to to
towards black people. Okay, with shiftless, ignorant, you know,
saying and it was one more I mean, they said lazy was another
one which lazy and shiftless, kinda redundant, but it was
basically shipped to us like you'd have had no underpinnings.
I remember this as a child now. This was how it was defined to
us. And that's why when he used that word, I was kind of
triggered. Like, oh, yeah, like whoa, you say like, but under
the definition of it is true. That there any fishing, you're
giving all this opportunity, all of this knowledge and you're not
doing anything with it. So from his perspective, that's
inefficient, right? That's inefficient. The other one is
psychopath. Let's see.
Yeah, this this this was kind of weird the psychopath that I
mean, according to Merriam Webster, antisocial behavior,
narcissism, superficial charm, impulsivity, callous,
unemotional, lack of guilt, lack of empathy.
Yep. And omit a mentally unstable person nest. That's the
core definition of it. So this is just another way of saying
Savage is a more scientific way to say it. Yeah. But once again,
we're back to Darwinism. And like I said, I'm not setting
these clips up this way. But I didn't make Jerry Taylor say the
thing. And he said, but this is how they view it, and they like
it. And it's baked in. It's genetics, is nature. Because if
it's nurtured and you fix the condition, that's, you know,
with the nurturing process,
yeah, they know, they clearly they clearly think it's nature.
Oh, yeah.
Ah, so let's go ahead and get into 20. See, yeah, yep.
That was noted earlier. Psychopaths have trouble
planning ahead. And you can test whether people live in the
present, or think about the future. In the 1970s, Walter
Mischel came up with the marshmallow test, in which he
gave children a choice between one marshmallow now, or two
marshmallows at some point in the future. This and similar
studies with older children find that people who can delay
rewards, that is those who think in terms of the future, get
better grades, are less likely to smoke or take drugs, and are
more successful in life. These results have been widely
reported, much less widely reported are the racial
differences with the usual pattern. Whites are more willing
than blacks to wait for a greater reward. And Asians are
more willing than whites. You get the same race differences
when you control for IQ. Because the ability to delay
gratification is correlated with intelligence. But it's not the
same thing as intelligence. Why would blacks be more
psychopathic? In his excellent book, making sense of race?
Edward Dutton argues that it's because of evolution.
When was this what was this interview from how long ago was
this recorded?
This is this is recent not Oh gee, this is this is recent. And
it's called if you want to find it on bit shoe is it's more than
IQ is entitled to video. Crikey I forget to name his operation,
but let me just go okay. Now when people say Okay, I think
okay, let me back up a little bit cuz I'm a little bit
flustered here. Why is the premises are the psychopaths,
just by his definition, breaking rules, who breaks more rules and
why it's the premises. And I'm not talking about the the ideal
Kentucky we're saying with a gun rack and a rebel flag. I'm
talking about the hardcore one world globalist mindset because
that's the fuller definition nearly fuller definition of
white supremacy is a one world government, ie the Illuminati,
globalism whatever you're saying you fill in the blank. Okay,
now, this is this is Jared Taylor's criteria for sociopath
a psychopath Excuse me. breaking rules. Check ferry to plan it.
Well, they do fit they plan ahead. They plan well ahead so I
can't I can't give him that when he knows that. Okay. Aggressive
and fighting. Didn't Nancy Pelosi just fly to Taiwan to
provoke people? Aren't we sticking our finger in Russia
out of nowhere in the way with the way you go about it? But
isn't this whole world surrounded our battle fighting
aid we killed the terrorists for the fourth time the same one
Don't Don't Don't Don't ixnay on the killing a again a okay. No.
No, you absolutely it's Totally psychopathic behavior.
risk taking, hey, let's release this lamb in China and see what
happens.
Even better, better net gain of function research. You know
what? They made a law here I will just send it to China we
can trust those guys
bright okay bad credit not not holding up to your financial
responsibilities who's printing more money? Oh he wasn't who has
a deficit right now bad parents and six understands I'm faithful
six I mean that kind of thing. So I mean, and this will he'll
be the same kind of person that tell you that that World War One
World Government or maybe he won't. But people that buy into
his way of thinking will tell you oh, this is the globalist is
trying to ruin our kids and teaching them about
transgenderism. And when you bring this on white supremacy,
he's like, no, no, no, no, unless the thing is white
supremacy. well defined as a one word government.
Right? Right. It's the same thing if you define it properly.
Right? There so triggered on holding on to that is so
embedded part of your identity I in I get it. I understand that,
you know, you're saying part of my identity, but which they
don't identify with you. That's the thing that people don't
identify. You're trying to identify with them what they
don't identify with you. Right? And you're on the chopping block
is just as much as me and as you see how Gen six and and all this
stuff is playing out. They gotta get you out of the way first,
because you got the guns? Yeah. You know, I'm just saying it's
this. It goes to show you how like, if someone like me said
white supremacy is the issue. Of course, I needed to find any
term on use. But it's not it's not it. But then they'll say,
Yeah, globalism is ruling the world. Well, that's what I'm
saying. Right? We're saying the same thing. Well, but that's why
it's important to define it, though.
Yes, well, it's semantics in that case. But the problem is
that white supremacy has been morphed into a political slur
against anyone who's not a leftist, Marxist, progressive,
right? Because even now, black people can be white supremacist,
or
Clarence Thomas, does he? Yeah, he's the black face of white
supremacy.
Thank you, thank you. But now you see, but we also got to
identify what white supremacy is and ain't no more supreme, then
take this shot, or else that's right. Or stay in your house or
oil or give me your guns or else. I mean, that's the biggest
kind of thug I ever seen in my life. And scary too. So I just
want I just want to lay that out. And then let's go to the
marshmallow test. I just want to ask you a quote. Have you heard
of the marshmallow test? I have a feeling
I heard about the marshmallow test on this show in a previous
episode. I'm not sure why or but it's, I've heard of it. Yes.
Oh, okay. So basically, instant gratification versus delayed
gratification is the is the poll, you're saying? Yeah,
because
you have to be smart to see that it's much smarter to wait and
get to later on, which, you know, that all depends how
hungry are you? I mean, there's a lot of reasons where the
marshmallow and by the way, I reject the premise that you
should be giving out free marshmallows that oh, this is
not healthy. Marshmallows is some kind of test, you know,
make it a steak or something.
And when the kid that didn't eat the marshmallow just didn't like
marshmallow shoots and you project me on him. Are you gonna
be successful kid you didn't eat the mark is like marshmallows.
But this is how arbitrary these tests are. Now, I'm not saying
it's something too now. We do have a serious issue with
delayed gratification versus instant gratification. And
that's how basically they will define unfit person is because
you don't think long term, you think short term. Now can a
person that's a one marshmallow person become our Learn to be to
marshmallow person? I think so. Of course. But they don't see
that's the that's the problem is like no, you had to one
marshmallow sim to the gas chamber. That's basically how it
boils down. I'm not being very crude with it. But that's how
they look at it like it's baked into your DNA. You're screwed
the part of this I think you mentioned it on the last episode
not and I've actually thought about I should go back and
revisit Trading Places. Right? Because that really, yeah, it
was with money. But it was also it was true white supremacy of
Mortimer and his brother there who was like, oh, you know,
should we can we take this savage and come and can he then
become as successful as we can? It's all kind of part of the
same, same attitude.
That's the argument that's going on right now, between the two
wings of the One World Government, one saying, You know
what, white people are Genet and Asians are genetically superior.
So we need to give them every advantage possible to take up
the spots we have. And then the other side of saying, Well, we
have talented people of all hues, they'll go along with it.
And we need to understand what the cause fall where they may.
And that's, that's the bet between Mortimore and his
brother was like, could they take a switch to people from two
different backgrounds and prove that his nature or nurture,
that's basically the whole movie, and in a nutshell, is
nature versus nurture? And it proved come to come out, it was
nurture. Yeah, if you gave somebody from lower background,
the opportunity, they would flourish, and then if you put
somebody from a higher, more fluent background, on the
streets, they will become a savage in a matter of days,
right. So yeah, that movie was, that was a very heavy movie
worth, heavy movie worth revisiting.
It's good. All
right, so now he's gonna ask our question, why are whites better?
whites and Asians evolved in harsh northern climates, in
which people had to make plans to make it through the winter,
they had to cooperate to hunt and share food, and couples had
to stay together for children to survive. Africa was more
forgiving, cooperation, planning ahead and care for children were
less important. Psychopaths could survive, reproduce, and
pass along their genes. I think this is as good an explanation
as any. The point is, however they got that way. People of
different races are, on average, different. expecting everyone to
be the same is crazy. Blaming clients, when blacks fall short,
is not just crazy, it's vicious. Until we understand this, we
can't even begin to talk about America's problems, much less
solving them. Thank you for watching.
Hold on a second, he's kind of contradicting himself here. If,
if it's nature versus nurture, what he's kind of saying here is
well, back in the day, early on, it was nurture because you know,
these were things that were taught you had to plan ahead to
make sure that you know the cold winter, etcetera, etcetera. And
then it became nature somehow, you know what I'm saying? That's
a weird,
what he's saying is the element the harsh elements, eliminate
the social sociopaths. I think that's where psychopaths excuse
me, eliminate the psychopath in those colder elders. Ah, okay.
Because it was basically nature took its place I guess. You were
the grasshopper instead, the ant nature had a way of weaning you
out and it made for better stock. This is the word I like
to use it made for better right.
So the so the people were naturally selected in Europe and
Northern Europe, because the smart ones did what was
necessary.
Right and there Yeah, they died off and and Africa was so nice
and warm and lush. It was a hotbed for psychopaths. Yeah,
yeah. You
don't have to plan ahead at all in Africa now for nothing no. So
easy, so easy.
And I will say to him so now if China puts his foot up America's
but America just it is I mean, that's just nature taking this
court right here, right? I mean, they're to the right of you on
you know, saying they're more or less psychopathic right so I
mean, see how this thing has become a slippery slope is if
it's good for the goose and it's good for the gander whatever it
may be may be interesting if China takes us take him and I
say take takes America out maybe it takes it was what was meant
to be because they were better stock but I know he doesn't
think that way. I doubt it to you. And now I'm not making this
person about him but I'm just saying people that subscribe to
his way of thinking but haha Wait, wait a minute. Wait a
minute. That's different. Know If China a Chinese, Asian people
look better. They deserve to be the number one superpower in the
world. By their logic by your own logic. But that's not the
way it goes. And this is why this is why they don't have any
footage to stand on. But with that said, we can go through
these next few clips kind of fast, because what it does is,
this is Jared Jordan Peterson, excuse me. And what he's going
to do is break down the occupations by IQ level. And
what I want people to point out is, I always says, and this is
where the genesis of the statement, it starts with us. It
starts with those Now, once this machine is to go rolling, they
come in for everybody. So he's gonna go through the IQ
occupation for IQ. And we can go through these pretty quickly.
Okay, so how smart do you have to be to be different things in
life? Well, if you were have an IQ of 116 230, which is 85th
percentile and above, so it's one person that ate up to one
person in 130, I believe is 8590 95. Is it 95. I think it's
95, one person a to one person and 20, then you can be a
attorney, a research analyst, and editor and advertising
manager, a chemist and engineer and executive manager, et
cetera. That's, that's the, no, that's not the high end for IQ,
by the way, you know that it can go up, while it can go up
indefinitely, although there's fewer and fewer people as it
goes up. So if you want to be the best at what you're doing,
bar none, then having an IQ of Above 145 is a necessity. And
maybe you're pushing 160 In some situations, and maybe that's
maybe making you one person in 10,000, or even one person and
100,000. And then also, to really be good at it, you
probably have to be reasonably stress tolerant, and also
somewhat conscientious. So you know, people want you think,
Well, why is it that smart people are at the top of
dominance hierarchies? And the answer to that, in part is
because they get there first. Right? I mean, everything's a
race, roughly speaking. And the faster you are, the more likely
you are to be at the forefront of the pack and intelligence in
large part is speed. That's not all of it is. So if you're
moving towards something difficult rapidly the faster
people are going to get there first.
Okay, everything is a race. Yeah. I think this is like
basically the definition or genesis of the word to how we
use how we use race. But the fact that he defines it by speed
thinking, I find it interesting it because I don't know what the
right answer is. But isn't intelligence more about speed or
depth? Because you can have somebody that is quick on the
draw and fast to get there. Or you can have somebody that has a
deeper understanding. So when you defy interest and when you
we miss wildly intelligence is very a very hard thing.
To measure your hand down. Yeah, of course.
Because now you got to factor in emotional intelligence. And I
made the story before about ms facts with the kids. Her
emotional intelligence is blows mine out of the water, right?
Because they're reading a nonverbal cues and, you know,
and just, it just it just superior to mine. So what I'm
telling you is, are we talking about here and like, how like
deep thinking or how fast you can read your regurgitate and
pull up?
It's subjective, it's really subjective.
But as you see, yes, it is pretty pretty defined. So, if
you want to we can go to the next one. Yep.
IQ of 115 110 to 115. So that's 85th to 73rd 85th percentile.
copywriter, accountant, manager, sales manager, sales, analysts,
General Manager, person, purchasing agent, registered
nurse, sales account executive. If you look at universities, the
smartest people are there above this, who are the smartest
people at university? What do you think? Mathematicians
physicists and mathematicians, right, right. I can tell you
who's on the other end, but I won't. Yeah, I'd like to though.
Anyway. Anyways, okay, going down the now 103 to one away to
slightly above average rate 60s to 78th percentile store
manager, bookkeeper, credit clerk lab tester general sales
telephone sales accounting clerk, computer operator
customer service rep technician clerk typist. So you see at this
level people are people have some technical skill and some
ability to deal with complex things. Okay, that's dead
average.
All right. So now we go. Where did podcasters come in around
85?
I don't know. I mean, maybe we were at the other end. I mean,
they were at the top end of it. Let's get
let's get to know You know what 300
is average dispatcher and a general office police patrol
officer, receptionist cashier general clerical inside sales
clerk meter reader printer teller data entry electrical
helper 95th to 98 machinist food to partner manager quality
control checker security guard unskilled labor maintenance arc
welder Dissector mechanic. Good good IQ range for relatively
qualified trades people 87 to 93 messenger factory production
worker assembler Food Service Worker nurse's aide
warehouseman, custodian janitor material handler Packer now what
you're seeing, what you're starting to see is that as you
move down the hierarchy, the jobs get simpler, they're more
likely to be assigned by other people or they're repetitive.
Because what IQ predicts to some degree is how rapidly you can
learn something. But once you've learned it doesn't predict how
necessarily how well you do at it. And so the more repetitive
jobs 10 people with lower IQs are more suited to more
repetitive jobs.
Hello, metaverse. Yeah, get your AI goggles on, you'll be
operating the same procedure over and over again all day
long.
And two things. So one, this made me start to think about
Forrest Gump. Remember, he was on that mental retardation cut
off on IQ score? If you recall the movie course, but his mama
sure they care about his education. And open up his
opportunities for everything else to transplant, of course,
is a fictitious move, but I'm just saying how arbitrary the
score your cancer can be. And you know, who to say if he was
like it was meant to retarded? You know, what would have played
out? And then another thing I want to point out is the
military. I just heard this recently on Tucker Carlson, they
actually lower the IQ score for entry into the military. Yeah,
that's because they can't get anybody because everyone's so
unhealthy.
Right? That this this, as the reason why I'm bringing these up
is as the requirement for a higher IQ is you're saying more
needed than ever. We haven't less and less people with the
necessary IQ to make it. So what do we do with those people?
I'm sure there's some good ideas out there.
I think we went through them before I'm laying it out by now
you're starting to crystallize. Yeah. Wow. The way thing and I
guess we're going to jump into number five,
under 87. Is there something? Well, no. Right? That's a big
problem. And it's something our society has not addressed at
all. jobs for people with IQs of less than 85 are very, very
rare. So what the hell are those people supposed to do? It's like
one, it's 15% of the population. What are they supposed to do?
Well, we better figure it out. Because one of the things that's
happening too, is that as the as the high IQ tech geeks get a
hold of the world, the demand for cognitive power is
increasing, not decreasing, right? You want to be a teller,
well, you know, those checkout machines, they're not so simple.
You want to work at McDonald's, you think that's a simple job,
you don't see robots working at McDonald's. And the reason for
that is that what McDonald's workers do is too complex for
for robots to do so. Well. So this is a discussion that no one
wants to have. But that's okay. It's still a problem. And it has
to be dealt with. So the US government, I think I told you
this at one point already, it's illegal to induct anyone into
the US Army if they have an IQ of less than 83. Right. It's
about 10% of the population. Because the US Army that and
they've been doing IQ testing since IQ testing began, because
they want everybody they can possibly get into the Army
because in peacetime, they use it as a way of moving people up
the socio economic ladder. And in wartime, well, obviously, you
need as many soldiers as you can get your hands on. And so you're
not going to be any pickier than you have to be.
Oh, okay, so that's what we that's what we get your
immigrants who come in perfect.
And, and they just lowered it. I mean, he stated it at three, and
I'm assuming this Carson's claim was made after this clip was
made. So what he said there's not a job for people at 85. What
else could you do? In the military?
Yeah, I mean, I don't know. Is this is this a scale that is
used consistently? Is this actually used in hiring
practices or is it just you know, anecdotally, what he's
explaining to us,
I think is the They probably go into a sample of people in
certain occupations and see where their IQ is. But I mean,
I'm just saying that we're going to have an abundance of people,
there's going to be out of a job. And it's going to be out of
a purpose more than a job. I mean, of course, the job is a
means of finances. But it's also a meaning of purpose. And when
you don't have people that purpose, that's the scary thing.
And I want to Well, I guess the
the modern day version of this score is do you have a degree
from a university? Doesn't it doesn't even matter what it is,
you got to have that degree now. Now you're kind of baseline 100.
Even if it's gender studies.
That's a good point. And that's what I was saying about. That's
why they use it in politics. Yeah, as a covert way of saying,
making that statement that you just made. People with IQs over
100 vote this way. And then they can leverage that it's a shame.
And just one final point, before we move into the next donation
segment. I want to let people know how fast automation is
moving, because we don't really realize it. But do you realize
that Redbox put blockbuster out of business and brow, red boxes
are being put out of business? This is how fast we're moving.
And MTV hasn't played videos in 35 years.
That's crazy. How I mean, cuz, yeah, try to explain blockbuster
to your kid.
But I mean, even even just 2007 is when the first iPhone came
out, look at what's happened that that's the metric for me.
That's, that's when everything started to happen. That's when
we got increase in all kinds of good and bad things. And talk
about your evolution. The human species was not prepared and
still not equipped for what smartphones do and algorithms
that control the experience. It's very, it's it's not
healthy.
But one last point is this. If we they really, truly wanted to
be fascist, thank you say, Okay, your smartphone can only access
meaningful and beneficial information. The same thing with
diet. But they didn't make it that way. Because they were
setting you up to fail. Yeah. I want to drill that thing through
is that they're setting you up to fail. This is the thresher,
this is the gauntlet. And it's stacked against you to fail,
because everybody can't make
it. They've got they they see a necessity to call.
We got to do better with more people.
Yeah, I understand that. There's some people out there who need
my service. Or any people out there who are weak. people out
there who are aware. people out there who attack just need.
A few more people as we wind out our producers for episode 85 of
Mo facts with Adam curry. Good interesting note from Cameron
Rose, who came in with $45 and says Hi, Mo and Adam, I have to
say I was greatly disappointed to hear your pontificating on
Darwin and his seminal work The Origin of Species. You could not
have been more wrong about Darwin and his views. And I
suggest you do a lot more research before discussing any
topic touching on evolutionary theory again, thank you for
telling us what to do. This was especially especially
embarrassing because I know it does not represent the usual
quality of research and insight you both normally provide. For
the record, the word race was explicitly used in his book as a
synonym for species or variety, and has nothing to do with human
ethnicity. Had genes already been discovered? I have no doubt
he would have used that word instead being the more accurate
term for what he was describing. Otherwise, keep up the great
work that you both do. GBG All right. Let me let me approach
this one. Doesn't matter. Did hasn't it? I disagree. By the
way, I can read the title. We read the whole title. It's very
clear what it says but okay. Let's say it was just about
animals, species varieties. His work is being used for
eugenicist purposes. So it doesn't matter if if he meant it
that way or not. It's been used that way.
And I'll respond back to this later ask the question then how
to him use the term race is his quote to say at some future
period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the
civilized races Oh, A man will almost certainly exterminate,
and replace throughout the world the savage races. Charles
Darwin, the standard, man, we know.
We'd be happy to hear back from you. Yeah. Thank you, Cameron.
We appreciate it.
Appreciate the pushback. We always appreciate pushback.
Dale spots $40 Thanks for doing the work on these deep dives
always thought I looked at things with an open mind, but
I've been missing the other perspective. Everybody misses
perspective. Brother. Dale has another one. So he's Oh, this is
interesting. Another $40 Yeah, he belong. I'll have to put him
up in the in the executive producer category, which is no
problem. Let me just make sure I mark that that that happens.
monad um, I sent my first donation forgot to let you know
I'm no longer a deadbeat. So I figured I'd donate again to be d
deadbeat. Thanks for all your work pulling back the curtain.
Of course, we'll do that for you.
Congratulations. You're no longer dead. The
3333 from jamesy jamesy says Job well done. Thank you, Susan.
Tillet 25 keen, Davidson $25 Jared Wescott. $25, and says,
You have changed the way I view a lot of things in the world.
Not a lot, but it is what I can show to do to show the
appreciation. Thank you. Now, again, Jared, this is the whole
idea of value for value. If it's not, it may not seem like a lot
to who it seems like it's a lot for you. You just said that. So
it is a lot and therefore very valuable and appreciated. James
Brown 24 at Sam Schmuck, he sends us $23.06 This is
interesting. The Rothschilds are big into gardening. Thanks for
going straight to the root of what's going on in the last
episode. That's good to know. William Torres. $20. He says the
white coats are coming. Yeah, no kidding. Mike Riley, Mike Riley
comics $20. Thanks for what you're doing here to your
continued success. Mike, thank you so much. Matthew Weaver. $20
Philip II $20 He says just finished up episode 84. Good
stuff. Keep it coming. Please. John Paul show farm fields send
us a row of Canadian ducks 2222 and dollar rates for the value
received here at the farm and Cavin, Ontario. Thanks, mon
Adam. I am no longer a deadbeat. That's right. Congratulations.
You're no longer a deadbeat. Derek Burch
Birch 1427 He says have appropriated your logo to hit
more people in the mouth here in Toronto. Please accept this
small donation for now. You've been on fire where the last few
episodes and depths you put into it. Keep up the great work. Oh,
ds laughs T's laughs He does a lot of end of show mixes for no
agenda. Thanks. DS. David Vargas. $10 Thank you. Thank you
mo karma, please got it. You've got Scott Webb needs another
reminder that value for value is it's in the eye of the receiver.
Sorry, I'm poor. He says Well, first of all, I'm sorry to hear
that. But thank you because $10 is a lot of value if you're
poor. So this is how we view it and we appreciate it. No need to
apologize at all. Roar shark and Rory white photography $10.
Thank you. Now we have a very long note here from Seth
Peterson who says I've been a listener to the podcast after
hearing Adam discuss it the first time on the Rogan podcast.
I truly enjoy and appreciate your takes on the topics you
discuss. After listening to an episode, I often felt that I
should send a message regarding my thoughts and your additional
resources which were relevant to the episode but have not done so
until now. As you discuss the concepts of the origin of white
supremacy and the ideas of those in power looking down on
everyone else. This book came to mind white trash the 400 year
Untold History of class in America by Nancy Eisenberg. It's
a dry read something I would expect to be read in the college
class. That said there are some interesting aspects and topics
worth noting, in relation to your most recent episode, the
main concepts which she discusses that I thought were
relevant were the ideas of the people who were sent by to the
Americas by the British elite and how the people were viewed
by the upper class. Long and short before America was a
country that people on the land were considered waste due to not
having purpose which was deemed useful or beneficial. And she
writes out the poor often called Mud eaters were seen as inferior
breed as in a sub species of human. Nancy does a great job of
documenting our sources so I'm sure you could do a deep dive of
interested Lastly, I finally got off my got off my duff and
started a monthly pay pal subscription. Please keep up the
great work, and I wish you the best Seth Peterson $10 Thank you
very much. Seth $10. Yes,
I must say that this will respond to him that sources
already own file discussing
baked $10 from the following people Dwayne spelling Spellman,
Jr. Arsa nomics, Eric Runkle, and Andrew Butterfield, Aaron
Sneed, Dave Jones. I don't that's our Dave Jones. Hello
Dave Jones $9.99 from Benjamin Bateman who says, Oh, come on. I
guess that's good. I don't know. Johnny Johnny hip Well, Oh 9.99
A Gretzky donation because he was the greatest. Interesting. I
don't know why, but I like it. Joshua Goodson $5 Thanks for all
the insights, Brandon glass with five have some quick bucks. We
appreciate it. Moises Hernandez $4.20. And of course, we find
Terry the humans subscription killer with his $4.11. And
finally, $2 from E and E. Thank you all, so much for supporting
Moe facts with Adam curry episode number 85. It is highly
appreciated. Remember, every episode takes effort, we need
some type of value return to continue. All you do is just
determine that for yourself, send it off, you can find all
the information on our donation page at mo facts.com Or go
directly to that mo fund me.com MOEFUND me.com And thank
you again for sponsoring episode 85 of Mo facts with Adam curry.
All right, so now we gotta go to the OG This is Charles Murray.
And he was the co author of the bell curve. And with Richard
Herrnstein. So we got to go this is where a lot of this IQ
standard deviation gap between the races stem from. So I guess
we can go ahead and jump into number 29.
Okay, Thomas Sol has claimed that the difference in IQ
between races is unimportant because it increases in all of
them. It is only that, for example, whites began to
increase earlier than blacks, we all get higher results and IQ
tests as time goes by. What do you think about that?
Tom Sol was referring there to the Flynn effect that and the
argument goes like this, the basically the black mean right
now is about where the white mean was in 1940, if you equate
these IQ scores over time, and that's, that's a tricky
phenomenon. That's a tricky thing to say, because it does
require you to assume that you're looking at real changes
in cognitive functioning. But Tom Sol, who is both a friend
and a person I admire greatly, has said other things about the
the IQ difference where he's convinced that it is a source of
a lot of its sources, a lot of cultural attributes. And to me,
I don't think I need to argue with that question. Okay.
So the reason why I like this conversation with him until
Thomas oil, which we're going to hear him speak in a minute, is
this is too academic, they have mutual respect for each other.
But Charles Murray, he's really pointing out just what he's
reading scientifically. But he doesn't really make a statement,
whether it's nature or nurture. But it was so triggering, that
people don't even want to have the conversation. And I'm like,
if you can't have the conversation, you're never ever
get to the root of the problem. And that's the problem with the
things being shut away. And this is why I look at the Boulais.
Because they don't want to have this conversation. Or even let
this information get the light of day because they're
different. I've made it out, you know, saying I'm the superior of
my gene, and I'm saying my race I have the superior genes.
Right. So they don't want if his narrative is nurtured, that's
more competition for them.
No, no, they can they can never admit to nurture Of course not
that that that goes against their whole nature, in fact,
right. Good point. So yeah, so I just want to make clear it lay
out this point about Charles Murray that he just stating what
his as a scientist what his findings are saying. But it
allows for at least seen before Jared Taylor, this Heiko me spin
them in a way to push a narrative, you know, and that's
often what happens even with Darwin, you know, people took
it, the Germans took it and spin it and didn't do anything with
it. As they learn from the Americans. We've, we've seen
Yeah, so let's go ahead and get into the second part of this
clip.
If I were to differ with Tom at all, and I'm not even sure that
how much we differ on this it would go as follows. The gap has
not reduced. When they first started to give IQ tests back in
the early part of the 20th century, the gap was one
standard deviation in statistical terms or 15 IQ
points, which means for those of you who aren't statisticians,
which I hope is almost everybody. I say that because I
don't think being a statistician is necessarily the right way to
spend your life. That if you have somebody who has 15 Point
IQ difference, and there are one standard deviation among the
above the mean, that means that there are the 85th percentile
84th percentile of of all people who take the test compared to
the person that the mean versus the 50th percentile. So it's not
a small difference. It's a pretty good size difference.
That hasn't really changed. There was a some narrowing in
certain kinds of tests during the 1970s and 1980s. And those
were mostly academic tests. And that narrowing seemed to be
real. There was some narrowing in the LSAT. There was a
narrowing of some others tests in the most purely IQ tests,
things like the Wechsler and the Stanford Binet and the rest of
them, the most recent renormalize of those tests
continue to show a one standard deviation difference.
Well, yeah, if you keep reading norming them and jiggering the
numbers? Yeah, I think you can continue to show all standard
deviation 15 points lower, Whoa, no good, you must be black.
And this is the danger of affirmative action in this
current state. Because when you say we need somebody with lower
qualification, lower grades to be on par, or put in the same
position as someone with just a just somebody still doesn't
numbers out there. Okay, we need to let somebody that has 100 IQ,
and an end grades that match that IQ, and where the normal IQ
is 120 and engraves, that match that, that kind of buying into
this nurse nature, situation, are saying we understand what we
need to grade them on a curve. And that's why I agree with
Clarence Thomas. And this is why he's such a huge have a huge
issue with it, because what it does is it lends credence to the
fact that oh, we're inherently dumber.
There's another way to go with this. And what comes to mind is
Kurt Vonnegut's Harold Berger on Have you ever read that or maybe
seen the short movie? No, I haven't seen. So the concept is
you have these obvious, lesser people. But because we've
introduced equity, and this is a great story, we've introduced
equity, so therefore the fantastic you know, very
talented ballerina now has to dance with, you know, with like
with one shoe. So she gets a handicap so she'll be so
everyone will be as good. The guy who's Thank you, the guy
who's super strong and is the the guy who is the best in the
mill. Well, he's too strong. So they have to put a weight jacket
on him to slow him down. That's that's the other way to go.
Right? So what you're making is my lineage or my genetics a
handicap? Yeah, it was because you had to bring it's not let's
elevate you up to where you need to be. Is let's bring down
everybody else. Yes to your handicap. You know, what is
yours? That's Destin.
Isn't that also what golf is? It's not how golf works.
Right? I mean, it's called a hat. It's literally called a
handicap. Yeah. Yeah, but this is the problem. But a lot of
people you know, get busy find benefit from this affirmative
action in these spots. And, and like I say, I experienced this
in corporate America. It was Oh, come tell us your sad story,
your sad race story.
In the HR department.
Yeah. That's what I was talking about that those? What was the I
forget the name of the diversity and inclusion? Di is what I call
it? Yes. It's more appropriate, but
you're like, Okay, we'd like you to tell your sad black man story
so everyone can hear this and understand your plight.
But guess who else had groups? The disabled? Yeah, the elderly.
You know, I mean, I can speak a little bit more freely about
like I said, the Indians didn't have a group and empowerment
group. The Ages didn't have an empowerment group. Aren't they
minorities? Why there's all of a sudden there has to be the
Hispanics, the blacks, the disabled, the elderly, the you
know, And the gays. I had one, two, really? Yeah. So I'm, I'm
just saying that when people give you support, you got to be
suspicious about that support. Because is it? Sympathy? Now we
got to go back to talking about sympathy might were higher
creatures. So we have to have sympathies for these lesser
lesser than beings? Yes, of course. So this is why I was
adamant about critical race theory, because this is how they
were going to try to teach it like you have a disability. Your
race is a disability. Now, let me help you. Right, which No
self respecting person with an actual disability wants to be
pity and has sympathy for, right. It's like when Latrina
Dan got knocked out his chair, he wanted to get back up in the
chair yourself, you know, saying like nobody, even if you have a
legit disability, but they want to, they want to bacon into the
education system, that race is a disability. And I find that very
troubling.
But also also critical race theory. It teaches that white
being white as a disability depending on how you look at
it, explain, I want to make sure I fully understand you.
Because the teaching goes, you're white, you have white
privilege, you're inherently racist. That's a big part of
critical race theory. True, I can see I can just depends on
which way you want to look at I of course, I understand what
you're saying. But I'm looking at the St. Look, I'm supposedly,
the bottom of the barrel. It's not true, because the black man
has already gone, the black man is done. Now. It's the SIS white
man, then it's the SIS, gay, white man. And no one wants to
be that everyone hates us. We're the patriarchy. We're the we're
the it's all it's all our fault.
And now I want us to fully explain it. I agree with you.
Because it's like, you know what? Because I'm gonna show you
how you make it. Flip it. You growing up in that cold, dark,
indigenous environment. Now I'm gonna say something as
triggering, but I'm gonna say it how they will say it coming out
of those caves? Yeah, no, I'm just kind of like what Jared
Taylor was kind of lean into, you know, like, kind of, we're
coming
out of those. That's right, coming out of that cold cold
cave.
Right. So you can't help that you willing to kill other people
that way? That's kind of like what you're saying. Wow, that's
crazy. That's amazing how they could cut both ways.
It works both ways, doesn't it? Yeah. I mean, because tell me
how black parents think about critical race theory. What is
just your black parent? What you pulled your kids out of school?
What was your main priority? What was your main issue? Just
one line? What was your main issue with critical race theory?
victimization of your kids? Yes. And so for the white parents,
they were sick and tired of being told that their children
are assholes. Right genetically genetically a genetic assholes,
you because you're white, you're the fucking problem. So it was
beautiful. It created horrible tension between the children on
an ongoing basis. But we all looked at it from our own
perspective, which is interesting. All while
nobody's learning. Okay, all right, the one place where you
should be elevating your intelligence, because I know now
we will teach you about grooming and CRT and why you're a bad
person or why you're disabled. And so and it goes on and on and
on. So let's go ahead and get into 31.
And you can say that that's because of cultural reasons. You
can say it's because of genetic reasons, you can say it's
because of a combination of both. We don't know the answer
to that question. But where Dickon, I guess would draw our
line in the sand and say we think the data are quite clear
on this is that the wiggle room for this difference has proved
to be small, it's proved to be a very intractable difference.
That has not responded to a lot of attempts to narrow it. And at
the time, we wrote the book on the race chapter. And we talked
about what had been a narrowing in the 70s and 80s. But we also
saw that narrowing seem to have stopped. And so we said you know
it's a good time to reserve judgment about whether the
narrowing will continue or whether it won't, because we
just don't know yet. It's now been seven years since then. If
anybody knows of any data, which indicates it's continuing to
narrow I'd love to hear about it. I know of some other recent
data that come out, which indicates that it's not. So it
is an intractable difference. It's not a result of cultural
bias in the tests, it's large enough to be. It's not the kind
of thing that should be ignored. It's also not the kind of thing
which should drive your opinions of people. When you see somebody
of one race or another just as when you see somebody who's an
Asian, you shouldn't automatically assume they're
smarter than you, even though they may very well be. Because
there's enough overlaps that that's a very bad predictor for
individuals. That's pretty much my reading on where the data
stand on the black white issue, right?
Hey, it's not everybody. There's some there's some smart black
people.
Right? And that's kind of why they're different. That's why
I'll just say, yeah, if there's one, they're different, they're
different, you know, majority are dumb. Now, don't get me
wrong.
1515 said, deviation points.
Right. So I mean, this is how they use science, but they never
have a question for the important. No, I never have an
answer for the important question. What's causing it?
Right? I don't know. I don't know. I can't tell you that.
It's like, we're the comic. And we can't tell you that we can
tell you everything else. Kind of
the bane of the whole issue. That's the basis of the whole
issue, but they can't answer it.
All these big brains. They can't figure out what what one thing
he said was, it's not a cultural difference and cultural not due
to cultural bias. My thing is, I think it's due to culture, or
the lack of culture. Now, and people can claim certain things
with caution. I don't think we have a culture anymore. I think
it was destroyed. I think that that narrowing because he said
it was a narrowing. So basically, the Flynn effect
everybody was moving on to saying like, all ties are a tie
rod is all boats. Right? Right. But then there was a trajectory
change, that blacks were kind of gaining, closing the gap. And
then all of a sudden, it stopped. So that doesn't explain
genetics to me. Cuz if you're, if you're genetically dumb,
you're dumb, you're saying that you can do about it. If you want
to say it, like it's high, and all of a sudden, in the 80s and
90s, right, when you had the real effects of no man in the
house, and the change in the family structure in the black
community was starting to really take hold. You saw the gap, the
closing and the gaps and start to widen again.
Right. But it was external factors. Obviously, it was
factors that were put in by governments and society.
Right, when also personal responsibility, you can't factor
that out. But once again, if we're going to say that the
school system can, is complicit and grooming children and
oppressing any kind of movement, see, this is where it thinking
it's kind of like, when you say, oh, there's parents teacher calm
their, their parent, teacher conference, FBI, and you're
seeing it coming in. You think they weren't doing that? And
then you feel like, we got to realize we're all on the same
boat here. But I mean, you can't force people to see that. But
that's kind of like a running theme in the show that we do is
that we're all we all being pushed in the same corner are.
All right, so now he mentioned Thomas oil or soul how you
pronounce it, her different pronunciations. He's gonna
speak, basically countering Charles Murray's point.
Is there a relationship between or an important relationship
between race and mental capacity?
What capacity is, if you mean by capacity potential, then who
knows? Because you can't measure potential currently. And I
suspect for the next 100 years or so probably, what you can
recognize and measure is capacity, developed
capabilities, the measure those SATs and stuff like that, but
but potential you cannot.
So when it comes to race, how does that play into the
measurements that we have today?
I'm not sure what what you mean by that?
Can you Is there a correlation between IQ that what we have and
what we're able to measure today? And race?
Oh, sure. I mean, there's, and there's always been among all
sorts of groups around the world. I mean, people in the
Hebrides islands of Scotland have the same IQs as blacks, the
United States, and probably for similar reasons, because they're
an isolated culture. And people with eyes from isolated cultures
tend not to have the same achievements as people who are
in cultures that have a sort of larger cultural, cultural
universe to draw draw upon. So the data are good for measuring
what is likely to happen with a given person at a given time,
under given circumstances, what is the ultimate potential at the
time, at the moment of conception, no one has come
close to anything like that.
isolated culture. Yeah. And the greatest sample that is and
you've experienced it, even digitally, we're isolated
culture, Black Twitter, a black sweat, right, you only get a
certain amount of ideas that lean a certain way. Now, one of
these days, we have to really go deep on hip hop. Because you you
make you mentioned. I mean, this is obvious, it's obvious what's,
you know, this has been captured and hijacked.
That was the mechanism. That was the delivery system, right? As
if you want to put it in their terms of weapons. Hip hop was
the delivery system. Hip Hop itself is just like a gun. He
was saying it doesn't use an inanimate object, you know, it's
like a gun. It depends on whose hands it is. And what,
what ammo it's loaded with. Right? It's
exactly an example of this isolated culture. And I don't
have the clips, because we've not really clippable I'm sure
you've seen it, but maybe not the little black boy hitting the
police.
Yeah, of course, I've seen that. Yeah, you bitch. It's a four
year old, four year
old, right? That's a child that grew up in isolated culture, and
has been indoctrinated in a way of thinking.
So it's all the child has seen is obvious, right?
And the way that he is same, so third world is to me, the way
that whole scene was played out it like you were in like a third
world somewhere, which is isolated, you know, what makes
it the third world is isolated from you know, industry. And you
know, and the benefits and industrialization
industrialization. So yeah, so that's a, that's a prime example
of isolated culture right there. And that's, they want to make it
more isolated does not to harp on the point about CRT all the
way around school, music, entertainment, your social media
feed your recommendations, like I said before, Netflix even
changes the cover of the artwork for the shows based off of they
think you're black or white.
Is that true?
I didn't know that. This is very true. I
have a while ago does
that I have a white Netflix? Because I will I'll tell my wife
this and she said you bullcrapping me. But what
they'll do is if they think you're a black, they'll show all
the black characters in the show. No matter how small their
role is in the show. Wow. This is how vicious this night?
It's of course, it makes so much sense. But I had not even
considered that that was happening with Netflix. But it
makes so much sense of course.
Right? Because I was watching I was saying something that I had
clicked on my wife she hadn't logged in or her account or
whatever. It was like looking at everybody was black. And it was
like a to you got all the white guys. You got all the white guys
on your you've been hanging out with me too much.
Man, man, man, man, man.
It's what you're watching to
me in the wrong category. But yeah, they. Yeah, it persuades
you to stay in this isolated culture.
Oh, and I mean, we were used to it from social media networks.
I, I hadn't considered that Netflix was doing it. Of course
they are.
Right. Alright, so now we have to ask the question, and Neely
fuller Jr. is going to answer it for us. Our white people, the
smartest people on the planet.
Follow logic don't even follow. People don't follow
organizations don't follow. Follow logic. Logic game with
the universe is the one thing we haven't been using. Because the
white supremacy has always beat us from logic, meaning cause and
effect. Does that mean that all white people are racist?
Language now, you never say that. You just say to those who
are in those who are smarter and more powerful than those who
aren't the white people who believe in racism and the
smartest people on the planet, say Good. Smart. Now what is
smart smart is being able to do what you want to do, if you want
to do it. better, smarter. And so that fits that criteria. The
white people who believe in white supremacy on this planet
do exactly what they want to do with anybody they want to do it
with who is non white and nobody has figured out a way to stop
them from doing it, no matter how incorrect it is, and if it's
a white supremacist doing it, most likely it is incorrect.
It's unjust. The system of racism itself is unjust a system
of non justice. That's what it is.
But they do it. Yeah, we've we've heard this type of stuff
from Neely fuller Jr. before on the show, of course.
Right. But what we have this app is this globalist white
supremacist system. The people who run it artists, smartest
people on the planet. At this time now, that's not that's not
static. But if we allow them, yeah, well, thank you for like
you said, like you always bring up if we use their apps and eat
their food, they suggest to us and take the medicine, they
suggest to us, yeah, we're gonna die. But they're smarter than
us. If they can convince us to do it at our own detriment. This
is something you have
to achieve and better than you can change. You know, it's even
better than that. They've set it up so that we convince
ourselves. It's continuously reinforced.
Exactly. And that's the trick of it. Is that Nas go back to
little Adam, like, it's so seductive and subtle. That you
felt the way that you didn't know why you felt that way.
Right. It was a it's my, it's like asking a fish like the
water warming and the fish was water. He was like the system
that we live in is so we're so immersed in it, that we don't
even realize how we're being manipulated by it. And if that's
the case, and we continue to live in it, and we got to agree
that they're the smartest people on the planet, and we just said
was done to us. Or we could do the opposite. And I just want to
make one more point is that Milly Fuller's definition of
smart is really effective. Right? Effective is producing,
producing a decided, I mean, you decided to do something and you
can do it the desired result? Right, decisive and desired
effect. Hence, the reason why I'm so big on the Seven Habits
of Highly Effective People, because aren't they we could do
is change our habits, they can be more effective or a smart for
nearly Fuller's definition, to combat this system, right? Is we
have to change our habits. And you've been on this for a long
time i are off the grid habits chair, now you're on our eating
habits. You know, I'm big on our voting habits.
Together, we can survive mo right? We're smart together two
of us.
Because the seven habits are saying you got to be the first
one is be proactive. The second was begin with the end in mind.
Third is put first thing first thing, think win win. Seek first
to understand then to be understood synergize and Stop
and Shop and install. And that's why I believe that's the only
thing I really think can beat the system and white supremacy
is to become effective, because what was the definition of
cause? These are the definitions matter? What was the definition
of syphilis again? Lacking and resource resourcefulness? Yes,
was resolving the ability to meet situations capable of
devising ways to meet the Ways and Means. So if you can't
devise ways and means you're shiftless, you're selfless wish
you're holding their definition to be true. Yeah, so i That's
why I don't subscribe to being ineffective. And I definitely
don't subscribe to be genetically false. No, I
actually embrace my genetics. And that's what triggered people
a lot because it's like, how dare you
but you're different. You're different. Actually, I'm
not. What was different was the nurturing process. And me, of
course, that's why I want to highlight I can you know him
like, oh, you know, I'm different. That kind of thing.
No, there's nothing different about me, it doesn't affect it.
I had two people that purposely made me and read me.
Part of the 5% Yeah, the talented 10th.
So, alright, we gotta get a double dose of nearly fuller.
This is him speaking more on the One World Government.
Why people collectively are the smartest people in the known
universe. Are you like eff apples, okay, to a group like
this, sitting here among all these African books and whatnot,
and among the white people or the white supremacist and they
are smarter than the white people who are not and they also
the most powerful, and also white supremacist, the most
powerful religion that this world has ever seen. nothing
matches it. Not Islam, not Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism,
none of it. Confucianism. None of these religions match the
religion of white supremacy. Because that's what white
supremacy means. It means the frame. It doesn't mean for
carloads of skinheads ran down the street shouting, nigger this
and nigger that the white supremacist would have you
believe that they are going to white supremacist. But the
number is not very large compared to the number of black,
brown, red and yellow people on this planet. But they are still
the most powerful people in the known universe at this
particular fan. And the smartest because you can't be dumb and
run a package like white supremacy on anybody. This law.
Yeah, right. Oh, yeah. So you can't you can't be done. So
that's the thing people need to stop going along with it. Or
they're right, and you deserve what you get. Either way,
they're right. You prove them wrong. And I'm in the business
of proving them wrong. And like I said, that's why we have to be
effective. That's why I identify these things. I highlight these
things, but it doesn't affect me in the way of stopping me from
being productive. And if anything else, this is what I
want to share with other people, because I'll share it with my
children. And the great thing my dad ever told me. And I never
forget it. We were running somewhere. So I don't know where
we're going. But. But he had noticed I was kind of like, when
my friends got around, I get like, kind of quiet down. And
then they got out the car and he was like, You're not better than
anybody else. But nobody is better than you. And that
totally changed my outlook, you know, saying because like this
humble thing, be humble. Oh, not humble. I'm polite. But I'm not
humble. Because that's what people want you to turn down
your life, you know, saying because it offends them or
doesn't fit in the narrative? No, no, no. I'm polite. I'm not
humble. And that's troubling to people. When you have confidence
like that.
Where does that humble come from, uh, telling people that
they have to be humble.
Where does it come from? It's because you don't want to, you
don't want to stand out the same thing, like what you were saying
about hospice CRT teachers. Be humble. It's the same, it's the
same mentality or same message. Right? Right. So you don't want
to embrace your strengths. And
that's also a socialist message. Marxist message, it's all the
same. Yeah,
correct. We all one, we're all equal, you know, that kind of
thing, you know. Now, I'm not gonna say the key thing is I'm
not better than anybody else. That's the first part. But then
the second part, nobody's better than me. So that means bringing
on Let's compete, and I have no and really the way Rassie races,
and I want to be able to point is, the way race should be is
like the Olympics, everybody, you know, saying everybody comes
together, and we challenge each other, to see who was good at
what. And out of that, you know, saying, you know, you get to see
who, okay, there's the Kenyans kick ass at long distance
running, you know, saying, you know, wherever you're saying
that, you know, Jamaican bobsled team is good, you know, or
whatever it was. No, I'm just saying it's like, certain groups
are better at certain things that make them supreme overall,
is that you know, is the fact they want you to be humbled and
turn your light down? And that's what a lot of these children are
being taught like, oh, no, don't be smart. You know, you don't
want to want to make everybody mad at you by being smart.
Now, isn't that also a part of the early programming with the
talk?
No, because the talk is framed in a sense of this is reality.
He's not saying like, this is reality, this can happen. But
you still don't live in, you're not in a constant state of fear,
or dumbing yourself down. It's just like, This is reality of
something that can happen. And what it's not like a nightmare
sitting out every day, but this is, this is how that little boy
got to the place where he is it. Right? Is the constant
manipulation and what's the word? I'm looking for?
indoctrination. That's how you get my dad is to not have to
talk with me every day. are like whoa, I'm glad you made it. How
All day the cops could have killed you know, it's like it's
like a, like a condom, like use a condom talk, you know, saying
like, it's that kind of talk. It's like, hey, you know, this
kind of thing happened. So that's it's nuanced, but it's a
little different. But yeah, so we got to talk about it. The
Uber man. Are you familiar with this? The overmanned? Nie J
meets je ne
champ. No, I'm not familiar with Nietzsche, but not really.
Okay, let's go and get into 3040. And this is this is this
is, I think, where white supremacy stems from
section 26. The over man. Nietzsche once said that he
philosophized with a hammer. By that he did not mean anything
crude, like a sledge hammer that smashes things he had in mind a
delicate hammer, like the one a piano tuner uses to strike keys
on a finely built musical instrument to see which notes
ring clear, and which are discordant or muddy. In writing
his philosophy, Nietzsche intended for his words to be
like that delicate hammer on your soul. When you read them,
how does your soul respond? Does it vibrate clearly? Or does it
wobble uncertainly? When you hear that God is dead? Do those
words cause you to shrink inside and fill with a squishy panic,
or do they strike a clear, pure liberating note that heralds the
beginnings of the tremendous symphony that you can become?
God is dead. So we must become gods and create our own values.
Yet most people are afraid of legislating for themselves. They
know there is inequality and risk out there in the big bad
world. So they want to let some higher power shoulder that
responsibility. But Nietzsche says for some precious few among
us, that realisation that God is dead galvanizes every fiber of
their being. They respond by feeling both passionately and
solemnly. I will become the author. I will create I will
embrace the responsibility joyously. I will move beyond
good and evil and create a new magnificent set of values.
And this is the overmanned Uberman
Yes. Nice J I think Nietzsche Nietzsche. Okay, and then not
see all my credibility out the window.
Yeah, really? Practice.
Oh, man, I knew it. I know. edify episode.
Please, hey, is this how I pronounce it? I may be wrong to
Nietzsche.
No way your your credibility going through your shot. It's
shot lot riding on this. No, but this is from the audio book.
Nice. J. I can't get it, whatever. And the Nazis and
nurses are read by the author, Dr. Stephen Hicks. So basically,
Hitler, this was Hitler's ideology. He borrowed from that
once again, we're not saying the person prescribed to the
thoughts of Hitler. But this is the weapon weaponization of
thought to fulfill a narrative and basically if God is dead, I
can become a god. Or you can look at another way God has to
be dead so we can become Gods
Well, that's an that's a good way of looking at it.
And this is why Darwinism is a huge part of atheists thought
process no offense to hate atheists but this is it's a lot
hinging on Darwin and his existence or not. Because
there's really really no counter argument to creationism other
than dominance that I know of. There might be other ones but
all the other ones Lance is some supreme being no matter what
your theology is, right? So yeah, this is why this him this
hand is a lot on this. But yeah, God must be dead so they can
become gods and this is what we're seeing right now. That
changing of definitions Yes. The Oh no, we're
not a recession. Yeah, that's God like behavior right there.
That's a premacy at his bet. No. Cuz I said so we that's that's
that because I said so. It's like, how do you how do you mean
we're not in a recession? Now this net gain of function, it's
like I mean, what do you see them cotton? You're starting to
see the mass slipping veil come off. Oh, do do as I tell you to
do you define it the way I define it. The dictionary is
written in pencil and that's why I was no more leaning on
definitions this time because we got to be clear on what we're
defining If not then what? What world do we live in?
You need definitions? Yeah.
And that's why they have a serious attack on you know, it's
the reason why they're attacking in dictionary the way they are.
Because they're redefining everything a woman you know, I
mean, we're to the point now I mean think how God like you got
to be to say okay woman has beginning been here since the
beginning of time. But where are we gonna redefine it? So like
that's awesome. That's awesome. That's awesome Kahuna is right
here, boy, I'm out. Alright, so I guess we can go and get into
what we start with 34 Yeah. 35
Such an individual raise mankind to a higher level of existence,
he will be the Uber match the Superman or over man. The entire
history of mankind Nietzsche believes will have prepared the
Uber Mensch for his great creative adventure. In himself,
he will embody the best of the past. The physical vitality and
exuberance of the past master types will flow through his
veins. But Nietzsche also credits the Judeo Christian
tradition for its internalized spiritual development. By
turning all of its energy inward and stressing ruthless self
discipline and self denial, that tradition has been a vehicle for
the development of a stronger, more capable type of spirit. The
new masters will thus combine the physical vitality of the
aristocratic masters with the spiritual ruthlessness of the
slave priests of Christianity. As Nietzsche put it, in one
memorable phrase, the new masters will be quote, Caesar's
with the Soul of Christ, unquote.
That's really interesting. I did not know that Uber manche
because of course I know Hitler and his Uber match Uber Haasch.
Having grown up in in the Netherlands, I didn't know it
came from Nietzsche.
Yeah. Superman. This is super superior. The premise
Uber above all, yeah.
This is their this is their ideology. And but they say, like
Caesars with the heart of Christ. Yeah. How about what
that means is we're going to be tyrants, but we're going to do
it lovingly. Yeah, we're going to make sure you, you love to
eat bugs, to make sure it's our own. So that's so lovely. That's
what he means. Like, we're gonna do some bad stuff to you.
And you're gonna like oh, and we're gonna take you and tell
you we love you're gonna like it. Yeah. Oh, man.
That's That's what forms the the Stockholm Syndrome. Because you
like these people love us. They're trying to save us, you
know, the end the world's coming, you know, climate change
with this mask on. Right? Take this shot. It's for your own
good. We know it doesn't work. But you know, we knew it wasn't
gonna work. I've told you we needed out.
We meant well, we wanted to make sure you were safe.
That's Wow, man like a man. Right? But it's amazing to see
like the masks come off. Yeah, and it was a let's go on blade
play. last clip. Now I'll wrap it up with a point I want to
make. We cannot
say ahead of time what new values the masters will create.
Not being Uber mentioned ourselves, we do not have the
power to decide for them or even predict. But Nietzsche does
indicate strongly what broad direction the new masters will
take. First, the over man will find his deepest instinct and
let it be a tyrant. The creative source of the future lies in
instinct, passion and will to put the point negatively, the
over man will not rely much on Reason. Reason, of course, is
the favorite method of modern scientific man. But Nietzsche
holds that reason is an artificial tool of weaklings,
those who need to feel safe and secure, build fantasy orderly
structures for themselves. Instead, instincts are the
deepest parts of your nature. And to the extent that you feel
a powerful instinct welling up within you, you should nurture
it and let it dominate. For from that spring flows true
creativity and true exaltation. Quote, The Great man is great
owing to the free play and scope of his desires, and to the yet
greater power that knows how to press these magnificent monsters
into service, unquote.
So this is what we see clearly with the trans situation. Yeah.
I identify as identify, not as you know, and it's not a knock
against Trint. What I'm just saying is We see what we all
thought was logic and reason and an undefined definition. But if
you're over man, no, no like, don't apply to me. I can be
whatever I want to be. And the point I was gonna make was your
saw this play out in a movie. Superman versus Batman.
I wish I'd seen it more.
Sorry. Cuz Superman, it was Superman. Let's see Superman
represented over man wishes literally that's that's the
devil
man is Uber man. Yeah. Right.
He was thought bring about good. And it didn't matter the chaos
it called, you know, when Superman or you blow up
buildings in Rome I ever look at how many people are Superman.
Right? I mean, like, right on to save one person. I mean, he
nuts. But, and Batman was like, No, you got to be within law and
reason in law, I'm saying and that's kind of thing and very
interesting movie, if you watch it, that was the subplot or the
underlying theme of that movie. Like, once you transcend earth
and all it's bound. As Superman day you can do whatever you want
to you can in the name, in the name of goodness. And that's
that Caesar with the heart of Christ kind of thing.
Which, which is exactly what some of our leaders are dear
leaders today are doing acting like super people. Right? Like,
it was just a small exchange about, you know, there's a bill
to ban the sale of AR fifteens. But in this bill, there's all
kinds of carve outs for Department of Education, the
Internal Revenue Service, Department of Agriculture, they
not only are allowed to purchase AR fifteens, they have quite the
Arsenal's and
millions and billions around. Yeah, when
this came up, and you know, the answer was like, Hey, what is
the what is the, you know, what aren't the Department of
Agriculture and it's supposed to help the farmers. Department of
Education is supposed to help children? Oh, yeah. But they
have their own policing unit. So it's very obvious they need to
have guns, and not even thinking about why do they need a
policing unit? And that is that is that arrogance that that
we're supreme? We know what's good for you.
Oh, my final note, let me drive home to two points that help
people at home stay sane in what you're about to witness. Because
this is we've been going through this why supremacy operates all
the two things. One, don't be confused. They're confused. You
know, like why would why would ours need guns and bullets? You
know? Don't be confused. They're confused. And number two, cos I
say so. Right. That's that's the Altair index there. Yeah. Cuz I
say what why was why we changed it because I say so. Why does
not inflation because I say so. Why not and NAS how the system
operates?
Expert it's the expert class. It's trust the science trust the
experts because they say so.
Right? because I say so. Well, I think we're learning if it
contradicts what I said last time. Yes.
Yeah, and I think we're slowly some people are starting to
learn that maybe they're full of shit. Certainly the like masks
vaccines working, not working. Inflation. You get enough of
these missiles and people start to say well you said so but you
were kind of wrong.
I hold this Shut up. Shut up and get your house
get canceled can't get to get ready.
All right. So that's my wrap. I will lose our love and
I have a feeling we'll be continuing this trend. This is
not over. We have more to discuss here when it comes to
the American eugenics.
And American Nazis because we got it we got to keep on that
one. Yeah, but as I always say, pay attention to everything. And
the truth will reveal itself.
Dan, we look forward to revealing more than next time on
mo facts with Adam curry. Thank you so much mo I had another
blast.
Same as well, Adam, take care,
everybody. We'll see you next time here on mo fax with Adam
curry.
Mothers a modern today and I knock envying mom. My mother was
an old time and though she was
quite basic. And she loved me because I was our baby.
And she wanted to protect me. And I remember my first love
affair and somehow or another the whole darn thing went wrong
my mother had some great advice so I thought I put it in the
words of this song she told me she said
strong strong strong the strong strong the strong survive I
can hear us right now
only the strong survive only the strong you got to be strong. You
better hold the straw with your head
down
I wouldn't let him know who we are. Why should he
be